World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
8127
World Ranking
4808
National Ranking
1770

Edwin W. Eloranta publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin W. Eloranta sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 227 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Edwin W. Eloranta D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin W. Eloranta sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - OSA Fellows For development and availability to atmospheric research of high-spectral-resolution and volume-imaging lidar plus important data analysis methods.

Overview

Edwin W. Eloranta is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the disciplines of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and related subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Spectroscopy.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics including Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Cryospheric studies and observations, and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications.

Recent publication venues for Eloranta's work consist of:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques

Among their recent papers are:

  • "AWARE: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) West Antarctic Radiation Experiment," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Ambient Aerosol Hygroscopic Growth From Combined Raman Lidar and HSRL," 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Ozone depletion in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere induced by wildfire smoke," 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Observations of the Development and Vertical Structure of the Lake-Breeze Circulation during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study," 2022, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • "Measurement report: Firework impacts on air quality in Metro Manila, Philippines, during the 2019 New Year revelry," 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Frequent co-authors of Eloranta include Robert E. Holz, I. A. Razenkov, Maria Cadeddu, R. A. Ferrare, and Tyler J. Thorsen, with collaborative work appearing across various scientific publications.

In 2009, they were recognized as an OSA Fellow for contributions to atmospheric research, specifically for the development and dissemination of high-spectral-resolution and volume-imaging lidar technologies, along with significant data analysis methods related to these tools.

Best Publications

  • Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation

    S. A. Ackerman;R. E. Holz;R. Frey;E. W. Eloranta

  • The Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment.

    J. Verlinde;J. Y. Harrington;G. M. McFarquhar;V. T. Yannuzzi

  • High spectral resolution lidar to measure optical scattering properties of atmospheric aerosols. 1: Theory and instrumentation

    Scott T. Shipley;D. H. Tracy;Edwin W. Eloranta;John T. Trauger

  • Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part I: Occurrence and Macrophysical Properties

    Matthew D. Shupe;Von P. Walden;Edwin Eloranta;Taneil Uttal

  • Practical Model for the Calculation of Multiply Scattered Lidar Returns

    Edwin W. Eloranta

  • Demonstration of a high-spectral-resolution lidar based on an iodine absorption filter

    P. Piironen;E. W. Eloranta

  • A Focus On Mixed-Phase Clouds

    Matthew D. Shupe;John S. Daniel;Gijs de Boer;Edwin W. Eloranta

  • Lidar Measurements of Wind in the Planetary Boundary Layer: The Method, Accuracy and Results from Joint Measurements with Radiosonde and Kytoon.

    William P. Hooper;Edwin W. Eloranta

  • Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratiform Cloud Properties from Multiple Years of Surface-Based Measurements at Two High-Latitude Locations

    Gijs de Boer;Edwin W. Eloranta;Matthew D. Shupe

  • University of Wisconsin High Spectral Resolution Lidar

    Christian J. Grund;Edwin W. Eloranta

  • Lidar Observations of Mixed Layer Dynamics: Tests of Parameterized Entrainment Models of Mixed Layer Growth Rate

    R. Boers;E. W. Eloranta;R. L. Coulter

  • A case study of pyro-convection using transport model and remote sensing data

    R. Damoah;N. Spichtinger;R. Servranckx;M. Fromm

  • Meteorology influencing springtime air quality, pollution transport, and visibility in Korea

    David A. Peterson;Edward J. Hyer;Sang-Ok Han;James H. Crawford

  • Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, NO 2 , H 2 O, O 2 –O 2 and aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements

    Rainer M. Volkamer;Rainer M. Volkamer;Sunil Baidar;Sunil Baidar;Teresa L. Campos;Sean C. Coburn;Sean C. Coburn

  • Active and widespread halogen chemistry in the tropical and subtropical free troposphere

    Siyuan Wang;Johan A. Schmidt;Johan A. Schmidt;Sunil Baidar;Sean Coburn

  • Lidar measurements of the atmospheric entrainment zone and the potential temperature jump across the top of the mixed layer

    R. Boers;E. W. Eloranta

  • On Deriving Vertical Air Motions from Cloud Radar Doppler Spectra

    Matthew D. Shupe;Pavlos Kollias;Michael Poellot;Edwin Eloranta

  • The LCL Zone and Cumulus Onset

    Nicholas P. Wilde;Roland B. Stull;Edwin W. Eloranta

  • The 5–6 December 1991 FIRE IFO II Jet Stream Cirrus Case Study: Possible Influences of Volcanic Aerosols

    Kenneth Sassen;David O'c. Starr;Gerald G. Mace;Michael R. Poellot

  • Coincident Lidar and Aircraft Observations of Entrainment into Thermals and Mixed Layers

    Timothy D. Crum;Roland B. Stull;Edwin W. Eloranta

Frequent Co-Authors

Glen Lesins
Glen Lesins Dalhousie University
Robert E. Holz
Robert E. Holz University of Wisconsin–Madison
David D. Turner
David D. Turner National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James D. Spinhirne
James D. Spinhirne University of Arizona
Matthew D. Shupe
Matthew D. Shupe University of Colorado Boulder
Thomas J. Duck
Thomas J. Duck Dalhousie University
Ann M. Fridlind
Ann M. Fridlind Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Roland B. Stull
Roland B. Stull University of British Columbia
James R. Drummond
James R. Drummond Dalhousie University
Michael R. Poellot
Michael R. Poellot University of North Dakota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. For those interested in broadening their expertise in human and social factors linked to the environment, a dsw online programs offer affordable advanced education with a focus on social work and community impact.

If you’re looking for flexibility, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be a cost-effective way to build interdisciplinary knowledge, which is valuable in interdisciplinary fields like environmental policy and management.

For students who might be new to college or prefer a straightforward path, some of the easiest bachelors degree options provide accessible entry points, allowing learners to develop relevant skills while maintaining a balanced workload.

Lastly, those specifically focused on the earth’s physical properties and ecosystems should consider a geoscience online degree. These programs offer specialized training in geology, environmental monitoring, and sustainable practices, pivotal for various environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin W. Eloranta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles