World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
66156
World Ranking
5452
National Ranking
2484

David G. Stork publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Stork sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 263 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David G. Stork D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Stork sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to pattern recognition and image analysis
  • 2016 - OSA Fellows David G. Stork Rambus Inc., United States For pioneering contributions to the theory and practice of computational imaging, computer vision and pattern recognition, including their application to the study of art.
  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2012 - SPIE Fellow
  • 2008 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to pattern recognition education, machine learning, speech recognition, and the application of computer vision to the study of art.
  • 1965 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

David G. Stork is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has a notable record of research in computer science and neuroscience, with a focus on computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their recent scholarly work includes publications in a range of journals and conference venues. Notable papers are:

  • "Deep transfer learning for visual analysis and attribution of paintings by Raphael," 2023, Heritage Science
  • "Reducing Bias in AI-based Analysis of Visual Artworks," 2022, IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine
  • "Computer Vision, ML, and AI in the Study of Fine Art," 2024, Communications of the ACM
  • "Recovery of underdrawings and ghost-paintings via style transfer by deep convolutional neural networks: A digital tool for art scholars," 2021, Electronic Imaging
  • "Improving semantic segmentation of fine art images using photographs rendered in a style learned from artworks," 2022, Electronic Imaging

The primary publication venues for their work include:

  • Electronic Imaging
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leonardo
  • Heritage Science
  • IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine

Frequent collaborators in their research are:

  • Anthony Bourached
  • George Cann
  • Ryan-Rhys Griffiths
  • Thomas Heitzinger
  • Jesper Eriksson

David G. Stork's work spans several main areas of study:

  • Computer Science
  • Neuroscience

Within these, their subfields of study are:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Conservation
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Archeology

The primary topics covered in their research include:

  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Conservation Techniques and Studies
  • Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

David G. Stork has received multiple professional recognitions and fellowships, such as:

  • IEEE Fellow (2018) for contributions to pattern recognition and image analysis
  • ACM Senior Member (2016)
  • OSA Fellow (2016) for contributions to computational imaging, computer vision, and pattern recognition applied to art study
  • SPIE Fellow (2012)
  • Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) (2008) for education and application of computer vision to art
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (1965)

Best Publications

  • Pattern Classification

    Peter E. Hart;Richard O. Duda;David G. Stork

  • Pattern Classification (2nd ed.)

    Richard O. Duda;Peter E. Hart;David G. Stork

  • Second order derivatives for network pruning: Optimal Brain Surgeon

    Babak Hassibi;David G. Stork

  • Pattern Classification (2nd Edition)

    Richard O. Duda;Peter E. Hart;David G. Stork

  • ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT HANDLING SYSTEM, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT HANDLING METHOD, AND WRITING INSTRUMENT

    Gregg Wolf;Stork David G

  • Optimal Brain Surgeon and general network pruning

    B. Hassibi;D.G. Stork;G.J. Wolff

  • Content based web advertising

    Jamey Graham;David G. Stork

  • INFORMATION PROCESSOR AND METHOD FOR RETRIEVING DOCUMENT

    Graham Jamey;Stork David G

  • Speechreading by Man and Machine: Models, Systems, and Applications

    David G. Stork;Marcus E. Hennecke

  • Calibration of a system for tracking a writing instrument with multiple sensors

    David G. Stork;Michael Angelo;Gregory J. Wolff

  • Speechreading by Humans and Machines

    David G. Stork;Marcus E. Hennecke

  • The Physics and Chemistry of Color: The Fifteen Causes of Color

    Kurt Nassau;David G. Stork

  • SPEECH RECOGNITION AND SENSORY INTEGRATION

    Dominic W. Massaro;David G. Stork

  • Speech Recognition and Sensory Integration A 240-year-old theorem helps explain how people and machines can integrate auditory and visual information to understand speech

    Dominic W. Massaro;David G. Stork

  • Hal's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality

    David G. Stork;Arthur Charles Clarke

  • Facial feature extraction method and apparatus for a neural network acoustic and visual speech recognition system

    K. Venkatesh Prasad;David G. Stork

  • Neural network lipreading system for improved speech recognition

    D.G. Stork;G. Wolff;E. Levine

  • Optimal Brain Surgeon: Extensions and performance comparisons

    Babak Hassibi;David G. Stork;Gregory Wolff

  • Visionary Speech: Looking Ahead to Practical Speechreading Systems

    Marcus E. Hennecke;David G. Stork;K. Venkatesh Prasad

  • Method, system and computer code for content based web advertising

    Jamey Graham;David G. Stork;Chuck Lam

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory J. Wolff
Gregory J. Wolff UnaMesa Association
Jamey Graham
Jamey Graham Ricoh (Japan)
Peter E. Hart
Peter E. Hart Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Marco F. Duarte
Marco F. Duarte University of Massachusetts Amherst
Rob van Glabbeek
Rob van Glabbeek Stanford University
Babak Hassibi
Babak Hassibi California Institute of Technology
Antonio Criminisi
Antonio Criminisi Microsoft (United States)
Dominic W. Massaro
Dominic W. Massaro University of California, Santa Cruz
Aggelos K. Katsaggelos
Aggelos K. Katsaggelos Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible and affordable online degree options. For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, there are online associate degree programs that can be completed in as little as six months, offering foundational skills for tech-driven roles.

If you are looking to combine technical expertise with business acumen, pursuing a business degree online is a valuable option. These programs help develop leadership and management skills relevant to tech companies and startups.

Cost-conscious students can take advantage of cheap online universities offering bachelor’s degrees in computer science and related fields, making higher education more accessible.

Additionally, those interested in broader technical careers might consider online engineering programs. These degrees allow you to specialize in areas such as software engineering or information systems, expanding your potential career pathways within the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Stork

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles