World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
85
Citations
42124
World Ranking
788
National Ranking
428

Antonio Criminisi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Criminisi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 262 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antonio Criminisi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Criminisi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Antonio Criminisi is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and works primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, with a focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's key research topics include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Model Reduction and Neural Networks, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Advanced Neural Network Applications, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, and Multimodal Machine Learning Applications.

Antonio Criminisi has contributed to publications in well-known venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Uncertainty modelling in deep learning for safer neuroimage enhancement: Demonstration in diffusion MRI" (2020, NeuroImage)
  • "Sequential Ensembling for Semantic Segmentation" (2022, arXiv [Cornell University])

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Ryutaro Tanno
  • Daniel E. Worrall
  • Enrico Kaden
  • Aurobrata Ghosh
  • Francesco Grussu

Antonio Criminisi's work in deep learning and machine learning methods addresses the challenges of medical imaging analysis, emphasizing safer enhancement techniques in neuroimaging and semantic segmentation approaches. This interdisciplinary focus bridges advanced computational techniques with clinical imaging applications.

Their research contributes to the ongoing development of models that integrate complex neural networks with practical applications in medicine, particularly through the use of multimodal data and domain adaptation strategies. This approach aligns with current trends toward leveraging artificial intelligence to improve diagnostic accuracy and imaging quality in healthcare settings.

Best Publications

  • The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)

    Bjoern H. Menze;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer;Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer

  • Region filling and object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting

    A. Criminisi;P. Perez;K. Toyama

  • TextonBoost : joint appearance, shape and context modeling for multi-class object recognition and segmentation

    Jamie Shotton;John Winn;Carsten Rother;Antonio Criminisi

  • TextonBoost for Image Understanding: Multi-Class Object Recognition and Segmentation by Jointly Modeling Texture, Layout, and Context

    Jamie Shotton;John Winn;Carsten Rother;Antonio Criminisi

  • Object removal by exemplar-based inpainting

    A. Criminisi;P. Perez;K. Toyama

  • Object categorization by learned universal visual dictionary

    J. Winn;A. Criminisi;T. Minka

  • Single View Metrology

    A. Criminisi;I. Reid;A. Zisserman

  • Epitomic location recognition

    Kai Ni;A. Kannan;A. Criminisi;J. Winn

  • Decision Forests: A Unified Framework for Classification, Regression, Density Estimation, Manifold, Learning and Semi-supervised Learning

    Antonio Criminisi;Jamie Shotton;Ender Konukoglu

  • Scene Coordinate Regression Forests for Camera Relocalization in RGB-D Images

    Jamie Shotton;Ben Glocker;Christopher Zach;Shahram Izadi

  • Decision Forests for Computer Vision and Medical Image Analysis

    A. Criminisi;J. Shotton

  • Efficient Human Pose Estimation from Single Depth Images

    Jamie Shotton;Ross Girshick;Andrew Fitzgibbon;Toby Sharp

  • A plane measuring device

    Antonio Criminisi;Ian D. Reid;Andrew Zisserman

  • Deep Neural Decision Forests

    Peter Kontschieder;Madalina Fiterau;Antonio Criminisi;Samuel Rota Bulo

  • Efficient regression of general-activity human poses from depth images

    Ross Girshick;Jamie Shotton;Pushmeet Kohli;Antonio Criminisi

  • Harvesting Image Databases from the Web

    F Schroff;A Criminisi;A Zisserman

  • Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networks

    Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Konstantinos Kamnitsas;Christian F. Baumgartner;Christian Ledig;Virginia F. J. Newcombe

  • Geodesic star convexity for interactive image segmentation

    Varun Gulshan;Carsten Rother;Antonio Criminisi;Andrew Blake

  • Creating Architectural Models from Images

    David Liebowitz;Antonio Criminisi;Andrew Zisserman

  • Regression forests for efficient anatomy detection and localization in CT studies

    Antonio Criminisi;Jamie Shotton;Duncan Robertson;Ender Konukoglu

  • Efficient Regression of General-Activity Human Poses from Depth Images: Supplementary Material

    Ross Girshick;Jamie Shotton;Pushmeet Kohli;Antonio Criminisi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jamie Shotton
Jamie Shotton Microsoft (United States)
Ben Glocker
Ben Glocker Imperial College London
Andrew Blake
Andrew Blake University of Cambridge
Nicholas Ayache
Nicholas Ayache French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
John Winn
John Winn Microsoft (United States)
Carsten Rother
Carsten Rother Heidelberg University
Abigail Sellen
Abigail Sellen Microsoft (United States)
Andrew Zisserman
Andrew Zisserman University of Oxford
Aditya V. Nori
Aditya V. Nori Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, both technical and interdisciplinary. If you're considering expanding your qualifications, it’s important to weigh factors such as growth potential, affordability, and time commitment. Many students look ahead to the best degrees for the future, ensuring their investment aligns with industry demand and high-earning possibilities.

For those seeking a master’s degree after their undergraduate studies in Computer Science, there are options considered the easiest master degree to get if you’re hoping for flexibility and attainable coursework. Alternatively, online education provides greater access to advanced studies. If affordability is a priority, you may want to explore the cheapest phd programs online, which can reduce the financial burden of continued education.

For those aspiring to leadership or teaching roles in education technology or administration, pursuing the cheapest edd programs online can be a strategic and cost-effective pathway. Exploring these online degree options can help you tailor your career growth according to your goals and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Criminisi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles