What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Statistics
- Social science
His main research concerns Citation impact, Citation, Citation analysis, Bibliometrics and Regional science.
His work carried out in the field of Citation impact brings together such families of science as Impact factor, Relation and Management science.
His Citation research integrates issues from Institutional research and Scientific communication.
His research investigates the link between Citation analysis and topics such as Operations research that cross with problems in g-index.
His Bibliometrics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Social science, Scientometrics, Information retrieval and Data science.
His Regional science study combines topics in areas such as Economic growth and Multinational corporation.
His most cited work include:
- National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (517 citations)
- A Hirsch-type index for journals (512 citations)
- Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (405 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Wolfgang Glänzel focuses on Citation, Citation impact, Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Data science.
His work in the fields of Citation, such as Citation analysis, overlaps with other areas such as Set.
His Citation analysis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Citation index and Operations research.
His work deals with themes such as Social science, Statistics and Regional science, which intersect with Citation impact.
The concepts of his Bibliometrics study are interwoven with issues in Science studies, Epistemology and Information science.
His research integrates issues of Webometrics and Stochastic modelling in his study of Scientometrics.
He most often published in these fields:
- Citation (32.05%)
- Citation impact (29.59%)
- Bibliometrics (24.66%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Data science (20.82%)
- Citation (32.05%)
- Citation impact (29.59%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Wolfgang Glänzel mostly deals with Data science, Citation, Citation impact, Information retrieval and Bibliometrics.
His Data science research incorporates themes from Perspective, Scientometrics and Subject.
His study with Citation involves better knowledge in Library science.
His research in Citation impact intersects with topics in Citation analysis and Benchmarking.
The Information retrieval study combines topics in areas such as Letter to the editor and Institutional research.
His Bibliometrics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Economic growth and Science studies.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account (84 citations)
- Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account (84 citations)
- Same data--different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science (48 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Statistics
- Social science
His primary areas of investigation include Citation, Data science, Citation impact, Bibliometrics and Similarity.
As a part of the same scientific family, Wolfgang Glänzel mostly works in the field of Citation, focusing on Measure and, on occasion, Productivity, Multinational corporation, Industrial organization and Operations research.
His Data science research includes elements of Ecstasy, Grand Challenges, Data integration and State.
Citation impact and Set are two areas of study in which Wolfgang Glänzel engages in interdisciplinary research.
His work investigates the relationship between Bibliometrics and topics such as Economic growth that intersect with problems in Public sector.
Wolfgang Glänzel interconnects Discipline, Chemistry, Information retrieval, Web of science and Scientific communication in the investigation of issues within Similarity.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
