World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
17295
World Ranking
3271
National Ranking
1577

Paula E. Stephan publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula E. Stephan sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 135 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Paula E. Stephan D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula E. Stephan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Paula E. Stephan is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research portfolio includes numerous contributions across multiple fields and topics primarily related to scientometrics, bibliometrics, public health, and rehabilitation sciences.

The recent publications by Stephan cover a range of subjects connected to the analysis of science and its societal impacts. Notable papers include:

  • Not in the Job Description: The Commercial Activities of Academic Scientists and Engineers (2020, Management Science)
  • Uncertainty and risk-taking in science: Meaning, measurement and management in peer review of research proposals (2022, Research Policy)
  • Charting the digital transformation of science (2020, OECD science, technology and industry working papers)
  • Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from Erc Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking (2022, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • The 2018 OECD International Survey of Scientific Authors (2020, OECD science, technology and industry working papers)

Stephan frequently collaborates with several researchers, with multiple co-authorships documented. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Susen Lailach
  • Thomas Zahnert
  • Chiara Franzoni
  • Johanna Martin
  • Marcus Neudert

Their work appears in a range of publication venues such as:

  • Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Research Policy
  • OECD science, technology and industry working papers
  • Management Science

Stephan's research fields and subfields encompass the following areas:

  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Within these fields, the main topics covered in their work include:

  • Scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences

In 2011, Paula E. Stephan was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), reflecting an acknowledgment by peers in the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • The Economics of Science

    Paula Stephan

  • Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology

    David B. Audretsch;Paula E. Stephan

  • Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists

    S G Levin;P E Stephan

  • How Economics Shapes Science

    Paula E. Stephan

  • Understanding Regression Analysis: An Introductory Guide

    Larry D. Schroeder;David L. Sjoquist;Paula E. Stephan

  • Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999

    James D. Adams;Grant C. Black;J. Roger Clemmons;Paula E. Stephan

  • Bias against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators

    Jian Wang;Jian Wang;Reinhilde Veugelers;Reinhilde Veugelers;Reinhilde Veugelers;Paula Stephan;Paula Stephan

  • Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time

    David C. Colander;Paula E. Stephan;Sharon G. Levin

  • Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated

    Paula E. Stephan;Sharon G. Levin

  • WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS

    Paula E. Stephan;Shiferaw Gurmu;Albert J. Sumell;Grant Black

  • Conflicting Logics? A Multidimensional View of Industrial and Academic Science

    Henry Sauermann;Paula Stephan

  • The Economics of Science and Technology

    David B. Audretsch;Barry Bozeman;Kathryn L. Combs;Maryann P Feldman

  • Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology

    Paula E. Stephan;Paula E. Stephan;David B. Audretsch

  • Careers of Young Scientists: Preferences, Prospects and Realities by Gender and Field

    Mary Frank Fox;Paula E. Stephan

  • Changing Incentives to Publish

    Chiara Franzoni;Giuseppe Scellato;Giuseppe Scellato;Paula Stephan;Paula Stephan;Paula Stephan

  • Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries

    Chiara Franzoni;Giuseppe Scellato;Paula Stephan

  • Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives

    David B. Audretsch;Paula E. Stephan

  • Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999

    James D. Adams;James D. Adams;Grant C. Black;Roger Clemmons;Paula E. Stephan;Paula E. Stephan

  • The mover’s advantage: The superior performance of migrant scientists

    Chiara Franzoni;Giuseppe Scellato;Giuseppe Scellato;Paula Stephan;Paula Stephan

  • The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns

    Waverly W. Ding;Sharon G. Levin;Paula E. Stephan;Anne E. Winkler

  • A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science

    Henry Sauermann;Paula Stephan

Frequent Co-Authors

Wesley M. Cohen
Wesley M. Cohen Duke University
Julia Lane
Julia Lane New York University
Ron S. Jarmin
Ron S. Jarmin United States Census Bureau
Frank P. Stafford
Frank P. Stafford University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, online education offers an accessible path to career advancement. Flexible programs cater to busy schedules and allow learners to balance work, family, and study. Choosing the right pathway often depends on your interests, timeline, and goals.

If psychology fascinates you, explore the best online masters in psychology programs that combine affordability with academic excellence. For those aiming for leadership in education, the shortest edd program online can fast-track your credentials and open doors to advanced positions.

Time is a crucial factor for many students. Some choose one year graduate programs to gain specialized skills and qualifications quickly. Others may benefit from 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees, which compress coursework and help you start your career faster.

Online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities create new possibilities—from research roles and public service to education and counseling. With flexible options and fast-track degrees, your academic journey can be tailored to your ambitions and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Paula E. Stephan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles