World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 47 1134 1054 497 451 104 14181

Marie C. Thursby publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marie C. Thursby between 1976 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marie C. Thursby published across 48 years, from 1976 to 2023, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2005. 1 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2005. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1976 2023

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marie C. Thursby: publications per year, 1976 to 2023
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 0
1986 2
1987 4
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 5
1992 4
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 4
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 5
2002 1
2003 6
2004 4
2005 8
2006 5
2007 5
2008 6
2009 4
2010 5
2011 5
2012 0
2013 5
2014 2
2015 0
2016 4
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 114
Download as CSV

Marie C. Thursby publications per year - data summary

  • Marie C. Thursby, a Business and Management scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, has 114 publications recorded across 48 years, from 1976 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1976 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 10 of the 48 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1985, 1989, 1993 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.0 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 4 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1976-1991: 25 publications (1.6 per year); 1992-2007: 53 publications (3.3 per year); 2008-2023: 36 publications (2.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marie C. Thursby publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie C. Thursby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 100–104 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 104 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Marie C. Thursby publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Marie C. Thursby, a Business and Management scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 104 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Marie C. Thursby, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Marie C. Thursby ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Marie C. Thursby D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie C. Thursby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69 47
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Marie C. Thursby D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Marie C. Thursby, a Business and Management scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 47 D-Index - the 63rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 63% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Marie C. Thursby, and about 37% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Marie C. Thursby ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Marie C. Thursby is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences and medicine, focusing on topics related to health, medical research impacts, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific communities.

The scientist's body of work includes four papers, reflecting a concentration on scientometrics, bibliometrics, and the intersection of healthcare and education during the pandemic. Notable recent publications include:

  • Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Quantifying the Immediate Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Scientists, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • New Facts and Data about Professors and their Research, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quantifying the Immediate Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Scientists, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Marie C. Thursby include Kyle Myers, Wei Yang Tham, Nina Cohodes, Jerry G. Thursby, and Karim R. Lakhani, each appearing consistently across multiple publications.

The research venues associated with their work are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Research topics addressed by Marie C. Thursby include:

  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Scientometrics and Bibliometrics Research
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Conferences and Exhibitions Management
  • Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Innovations in Educational Methods
  • COVID-19 and Healthcare Impacts

Within their main fields of study, the subfields explored are:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Marie C. Thursby has been recognized with the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) awarded in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions

    Richard Jensen;Marie Thursby

  • Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing

    Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities

    Jerry G. Thursby;Richard Jensen;Marie C. Thursby

  • Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.

    Kyle R. Myers;Wei Yang Tham;Yian Yin;Nina Cohodes

  • BILATERAL TRADE FLOWS, THE LINDER HYPOTHESIS, AND EXCHANGE RISK

    Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance

    Frank T. Rothaermel;Marie Thursby

  • Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: ‘The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with’

    Richard A. Jensen;Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages

    Frank T. Rothaermel;Marie Thursby

  • Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Tale of University Licensing

    Richard Jensen;Marie Thursby

  • US Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University

    Jerry Thursby;Anne W. Fuller;Marie Thursby

  • Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University–Industry Licensing

    Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view

    Marie C Thursby;Jerry Thursby;Swasti Gupta-Mukherjee

  • The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research

    Frank T. Rothaermel;Marie Thursby

  • University Licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act

    Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Show Me the Right Stuff: Signals for High Tech Startups

    Annamaria Conti;Marie Thursby;Frank T. Rothaermel

  • Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty

    Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • PATENTS AS SIGNALS FOR STARTUP FINANCING

    Annamaria Conti;Jerry Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Who is Selling the Ivory Tower

    Jerry G. Thursby;Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Patents as Signals for Startup Financing: Patents as Signals for Startup Financing

    Annamaria Conti;Jerry Thursby;Marie Thursby

  • Has the Bayh-Dole act compromised basic research?

    Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

  • Incumbent firm invention in emerging fields: evidence from the semiconductor industry

    Lin Jiang;Lin Jiang;Justin Tan;Marie Thursby

  • Here or There? A Survey of Factors in Multinational R&D Location: Report to the Government/University/Industry Research Roundtable

    Jerry G. Thursby;Jerry G. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby;Marie C. Thursby

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerry G. Thursby
Jerry G. Thursby Harvard University
Kala Krishna
Kala Krishna Pennsylvania State University
Frank T. Rothaermel
Frank T. Rothaermel Georgia Institute of Technology
Scott Shane
Scott Shane Case Western Reserve University
Dan Kovenock
Dan Kovenock Chapman University
Karim R. Lakhani
Karim R. Lakhani Harvard University
Adam B. Jaffe
Adam B. Jaffe Motu Economic and Public Policy Research
Josh Lerner
Josh Lerner Harvard University
Thomas W. Hertel
Thomas W. Hertel Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management education in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree choices. Many students are now interested in finding affordable online master's programs that fit their budget and career goals. Online degrees in business fields can be highly flexible, allowing you to balance studies with work.

Specialized programs, such as the cheapest online data science masters, are becoming popular as businesses demand more expertise in analytics and technology. For those looking to achieve the highest academic qualifications, pursuing a PhD in organizational leadership can open doors to executive roles or academic careers.

As you weigh your options, consider enrolling in one of the best online universities to ensure quality education and national accreditation. Selecting the right pathway can lead to rewarding career opportunities in management, consulting, analytics, and organizational leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Marie C. Thursby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles