World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
6558
World Ranking
12937
National Ranking
5226

David E. Breen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Breen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David E. Breen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Breen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Breen is affiliated with Drexel University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of engineering and computer science with a focus on subfields including polymers and plastics, computer vision and pattern recognition, computational mechanics, artificial intelligence, and computer graphics and computer-aided design.

The main topics in Breen's body of work include textile materials and evaluations, 3D shape modeling and analysis, additive manufacturing and 3D printing technologies, smart agriculture and AI, water quality monitoring technologies, AI in cancer detection, and computer graphics and visualization techniques.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Breen feature contributions to the understanding and modeling of knitted fabrics and computational methods. These include:

  • An optimized yarn-level geometric model for Finite Element Analysis of weft-knitted fabrics, 2020, Computer Aided Geometric Design
  • Geometric modeling of complex knitting stitches using a bicontinuous surface and its offsets, 2021, Computer Aided Geometric Design
  • Geometric modeling of knitted fabrics using helicoid scaffolds, 2020, Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
  • Computational metadata generation methods for biological specimen image collections, 2022, International Journal on Digital Libraries
  • Loop Order Analysis of Weft-Knitted Textiles, 2022, Textiles

Breen collaborates frequently with a number of researchers. The most frequent coauthors include Geneviève Dion, Chelsea Amanatides, Joel Pepper, Levi Kapllani, and Jane Greenberg.

Their publications have appeared in a variety of venues, with multiple papers in Computer Aided Geometric Design and the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). Other publication venues include the Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, International Journal on Digital Libraries, and Research Square.

Best Publications

  • Predicting the drape of woven cloth using interacting particles

    David E. Breen;Donald H. House;Michael J. Wozny

  • Geometrically deformed models: a method for extracting closed geometric models form volume data

    James V. Miller;David E. Breen;William E. Lorensen;Robert M. O'Bara

  • A particle-based model for simulating the draping behavior of woven cloth

    David Edward Breen

  • Cloth modeling and animation

    Donald H. House;David E. Breen

  • Interactive Occlusion and Collision of Real and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality

    David E. Breen;Eric Rose;Ross T. Whitaker

  • Level set surface editing operators

    Ken Museth;David E. Breen;Ross T. Whitaker;Alan H. Barr

  • Calibration requirements and procedures for a monitor-based augmented reality system

    M. Tuceryan;D.S. Greer;R.T. Whitaker;D.E. Breen

  • Real-time vision-based camera tracking for augmented reality applications

    Dieter Koller;Gudrun Klinker;Eric Rose;David Breen

  • A physically-based particle model of woven cloth

    David E. Breen;Donald H. House;Phillip H. Getto

  • Interactive Occlusion and Automatic Object Placement for Augmented Reality

    David E. Breen;Ross T. Whitaker;Eric Rose;Mihran Tuceryan

  • Semi-regular mesh extraction from volumes

    Z.J. Wood;M. Desbrun;P. Schroder;D. Breen

  • 3D Scan-Conversion of CSG Models into Distance, Closest-Point and Colour Volumes

    David E. Breen;Sean Mauch;Ross T. Whitaker

  • A level-set approach for the metamorphosis of solid models

    D.E. Breen;R.T. Whitaker

  • 3D scan conversion of CSG models into distance volumes

    David E. Breen;Sean Mauch;Ross T. Whitaker

  • Distributed Augmented Reality for Collaborative Design Applications

    Klaus H. Ahlers;André Kramer;David E. Breen;Pierre-Yves Chevalier

  • Annotating real-world objects using augmented reality

    Eric Rose;David Breen;Klaus H. Ahlers;Chris Crampton

  • Scalable interactive volume rendering using off-the-shelf components

    S. Lombeyda;L. Moll;M. Shand;D. Breen

  • Level set modeling and segmentation of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging brain data

    Leonid Zhukov;Ken Museth;David E. Breen;Alan H. Barr

  • Calculating Center of Mass in an Unbounded 2D Environment

    Linge Bai;David E. Breen

  • Fitting a woven-cloth model to a curved surface: mapping algorithms

    Masaki Aono;David E. Breen;Michael J. Wozny

  • Confluence of computer vision and interactive graphies for augmented reality

    Gudrun J. Klinker;Klaus H. Ahlers;David E. Breen;Pierre-Yves Chevalier

  • Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation

    Rick Parent;Karan Singh;David Breen;Ming C. Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross T. Whitaker
Ross T. Whitaker University of Utah
Alan H. Barr
Alan H. Barr California Institute of Technology
Gudrun Klinker
Gudrun Klinker Technical University of Munich
Frank Jülicher
Frank Jülicher Max Planck Society
William C. Regli
William C. Regli University of Maryland, College Park
Guillermo Sapiro
Guillermo Sapiro Princeton University
Vadim Shapiro
Vadim Shapiro University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jessica K. Hodgins
Jessica K. Hodgins Carnegie Mellon University
Mathieu Desbrun
Mathieu Desbrun California Institute of Technology
Karan Singh
Karan Singh University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s important to explore additional online degree options and career pathways that can broaden your skillset and job prospects. For those seeking to fast-track their education, a computer science accelerated program offers a way to earn your degree more quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Interested in fields that intersect with technology? There are flexible, affordable online programs in related STEM areas. For instance, an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online can open the door to careers focused on sustainability and environmental protection.

If you are concerned about finances, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is crucial to make informed decisions. Affordability and return on investment should always be considered when choosing a program.

For those drawn to scientific discovery, a bachelor of science in physics online can provide a strong foundation for careers in research, technology, and education.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Breen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles