What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Philippe Perret focuses on Ecology, Habitat, Nest, Fledge and Species richness.
Ecology is often connected to Gene flow in his work.
His Habitat research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Deciduous, Foraging and Evergreen.
His Fledge research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Larva and Protocalliphora.
Philippe Perret usually deals with Species richness and limits it to topics linked to Caterpillar and Brood, Parus and Saturation.
His research investigates the connection between Adaptation and topics such as Natural population growth that intersect with issues in Zoology.
His most cited work include:
- Energetic and fitness costs of mismatching resource supply and demand in seasonally breeding birds. (320 citations)
- Blue tits use selected plants and olfaction to maintain an aromatic environment for nestlings (149 citations)
- Feeding ecology and life history variation of the blue tit in Mediterranean deciduous and sclerophyllous habitats. (141 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Zoology, Nest, Cyanistes and Habitat.
As part of one scientific family, Philippe Perret deals mainly with the area of Ecology, narrowing it down to issues related to the Parus caeruleus, and often Body size.
He combines subjects such as Yolk and Reproduction with his study of Zoology.
His work in Nest addresses issues such as Captivity, which are connected to fields such as Egg laying.
His Cyanistes study incorporates themes from Passerine, Seasonal breeder, Phenology and Plumage.
His study focuses on the intersection of Habitat and fields such as Range with connections in the field of Biological dispersal and Genus.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (74.47%)
- Zoology (36.17%)
- Nest (28.72%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2019)?
- Ecology (74.47%)
- Cyanistes (29.79%)
- Nest (28.72%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Philippe Perret mainly focuses on Ecology, Cyanistes, Nest, Zoology and Nest box.
Philippe Perret undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Ecology and Parasitemia in his work.
The concepts of his Cyanistes study are interwoven with issues in Seasonal breeder, Deciduous, Phenology, Passerine and Evergreen.
The Deciduous study combines topics in areas such as Food chain, Habitat, Local adaptation and Life history theory.
The Feather and Sexual selection research Philippe Perret does as part of his general Zoology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Intensity and Plasmodium relictum, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
He works mostly in the field of Nest box, limiting it down to concerns involving Parus and, occasionally, Ficedula and Nesting.
Between 2011 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Variation in phenotypic plasticity and selection patterns in blue tit breeding time: between- and within-population comparisons (60 citations)
- Female plumage coloration is sensitive to the cost of reproduction. An experiment in blue tits (40 citations)
- Avian malaria: a new lease of life for an old experimental model to study the evolutionary ecology of Plasmodium. (40 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Ecology, Cyanistes, Zoology, Avian clutch size and Clutch are his primary areas of study.
His Ecology research focuses on Evolutionary ecology in particular.
His studies deal with areas such as Evolutionary biology, Natural selection and Adaptation as well as Cyanistes.
In general Zoology study, his work on Sexual selection often relates to the realm of Plasmodium relictum, Parasitemia and Malaria, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His Sexual selection research includes themes of Feather, Reproduction, Seasonal breeder and Plumage.
His Avian clutch size study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Bird nest and Fledge, Hatching, Hatchling.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
