World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
8912
World Ranking
7529
National Ranking
3274

Fillia Makedon publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fillia Makedon sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 443 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fillia Makedon D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fillia Makedon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fillia Makedon is affiliated with The University of Texas at Arlington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several key subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, and Human-Computer Interaction.

The scholar's work covers a range of topics that intersect advanced computing technologies and human-centered applications. These topics include Augmented Reality Applications, Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Human Pose and Action Recognition, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics.

In terms of publication venues, Fillia Makedon has contributed notably to the journal Technologies, with nine publications, followed by six papers published on arXiv (Cornell University). Other venues include MDPI (MDPI AG), Applied Sciences, and Psychiatric Annals.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Fillia Makedon include:

  • A Survey on Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning, 2020, MDPI (MDPI AG)
  • A Survey of Robots in Healthcare, 2021, Technologies
  • A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies for Manufacturing Training, 2020, Technologies
  • vIS: An Immersive Virtual Storytelling System for Vocational Training, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Examining the Landscape of Cognitive Fatigue Detection: A Comprehensive Survey, 2024, Technologies

Their frequent collaborators include Ashish Jaiswal, Mohammad Zaki Zadeh, Ashwin Ramesh Babu, Christos Sevastopoulos, and Maria Kyrarini.

Best Publications

  • A Survey on Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning

    Ashish Jaiswal;Ashwin Ramesh Babu;Mohammad Zaki Zadeh;Debapriya Banerjee

  • Learning from incomplete ratings using non-negative matrix factorization

    Sheng Zhang;Weihong Wang;James Ford;Fillia Makedon

  • A Survey of Robots in Healthcare

    Maria Kyrarini;Fotios Lygerakis;Akilesh Rajavenkatanarayanan;Christos Sevastopoulos

  • Fast approximation algorithms for multicommodity flow problems

    Tom Leighton;Clifford Stein;Fillia Makedon;Éva Tardos

  • A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies for Manufacturing Training

    Sanika Doolani;Callen Wessels;Varun Kanal;Christos Sevastopoulos

  • HykGene: a hybrid approach for selecting marker genes for phenotype classification using microarray gene expression data

    Yuhang Wang;Fillia S. Makedon;James C. Ford;Justin Pearlman

  • Spherical mapping for processing of 3D closed surfaces

    Li Shen;Li Shen;Fillia Makedon

  • A 2n-2 step algorithm for routing in an nxn array with constant size queues

    T. Leighton;F. Makedon;I. G. Tollis

  • Using singular value decomposition approximation for collaborative filtering

    Sheng Zhang;Weihong Wang;J. Ford;F. Makedon

  • Entrapping adversaries for source protection in sensor networks

    Yi Ouyang;Xhengyi Le;Guanling Chen;J. Ford

  • Fast nonnegative matrix tri-factorization for large-scale data co-clustering

    Hua Wang;Feiping Nie;Heng Huang;Fillia Makedon

  • On minimizing width in linear layouts

    Fillia Makedon;Ivan Hal Sudborough

  • Analysis of a low-dimensional linear model under recommendation attacks

    Sheng Zhang;Yi Ouyang;James Ford;Fillia Makedon

  • Attack detection in time series for recommender systems

    Sheng Zhang;Amit Chakrabarti;James Ford;Fillia Makedon

  • Data mining in brain imaging

    Vasileios Megalooikonomou;James Ford;Li Shen;Fillia Makedon

  • Digital cities of the future: Extending @home assistive technologies for the elderly and the disabled

    Charalampos Doukas;Vangelis Metsis;Eric Becker;Zhengyi Le

  • A surface-based approach for classification of 3D neuroanatomic structures

    Li Shen;James Ford;Fillia Makedon;Andrew Saykin

  • SmartDrawer: RFID-based smart medicine drawer for assistive environments

    Eric Becker;Vangelis Metsis;Roman Arora;Jyothi Vinjumur

  • Patient classification of fMRI activation maps

    James Ford;Hany Farid;Fillia Makedon;Laura A. Flashman

  • Application of Relief-F feature filtering algorithm to selecting informative genes for cancer classification using microarray data

    Yuhang Wang;F. Makedon

Frequent Co-Authors

Li Shen
Li Shen University of Pennsylvania
Heng Huang
Heng Huang University of Pittsburgh
Andrew J. Saykin
Andrew J. Saykin Indiana University
Vassilis Athitsos
Vassilis Athitsos The University of Texas at Arlington
Ilias Maglogiannis
Ilias Maglogiannis University of Piraeus
Glenn R. Wylie
Glenn R. Wylie Kessler Foundation
Hua Wang
Hua Wang Victoria University
Gerasimos Potamianos
Gerasimos Potamianos University Of Thessaly

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Computer Science grows, students are exploring flexible online options to advance their education and careers. Affordable pathways are gaining popularity, such as pursuing a cheap mba online, which is ideal for those seeking tech leadership or management roles.

For students aiming to fast-track their credentials, 1 year online masters programs offer an efficient route to advanced expertise. Fast completion can help working professionals upskill without putting their careers on hold.

Those interested in practical and lucrative fields can also consider easy degrees to get online that pay well. These programs focus on marketable skills and can open doors to high-demand jobs, including roles in tech support, data analytics, and project management.

For anyone passionate about emerging technologies, enrolling in ai degree programs can provide a competitive edge in the fast-growing field of artificial intelligence.

No matter your goals, these online pathways can make it easier to align your computer science education with the demands of today's job market.

Best Scientists Citing Fillia Makedon

Trending Scientists