World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 34 9327 8608 518 499 79 5008

Rita Garbelli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rita Garbelli between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rita Garbelli published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2022. 10 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2022. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1990 2025

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rita Garbelli: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 5
2010 1
2011 5
2012 3
2013 0
2014 5
2015 3
2016 5
2017 2
2018 3
2019 3
2020 5
2021 8
2022 10
2023 3
2024 6
2025 4
Total 88
Download as CSV

Rita Garbelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita Garbelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 79
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Rita Garbelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita Garbelli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296 34
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Rita Garbelli is affiliated with the Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of medicine, with a particular emphasis on epilepsy and neurological disorders.

The main fields of study addressed in Garbelli's work include:

  • Medicine

Within medicine, their subfields of expertise encompass:

  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Genetics
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects related to neurological conditions and treatment modalities, including:

  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology

Frequent coauthors contributing to Garbelli's work are:

  • Marco de Curtis
  • Francesco Deleo
  • Laura Tassi
  • L Rossini
  • Dalia De Santis

Key venues for publication include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Epilepsia
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neurology
  • The Lancet Neurology

Significant papers featuring Garbelli's research are:

  • Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study (2020, The Lancet Neurology)
  • The ILAE consensus classification of focal cortical dysplasia: An update proposed by an ad hoc task force of the ILAE diagnostic methods commission (2022, Epilepsia)
  • Toward a better definition of focal cortical dysplasia: An iterative histopathological and genetic agreement trial (2021, Epilepsia)
  • Dendritic pathology, spine loss and synaptic reorganization in human cortex from epilepsy patients (2020, Brain)
  • A hypothesis for the role of axon demyelination in seizure generation (2021, Epilepsia)

Best Publications

  • Focal cortical dysplasia: neuropathological subtypes, EEG, neuroimaging and surgical outcome.

    L. Tassi;N. Colombo;R. Garbelli;S. Francione

  • Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

    Herm J Lamberink;Willem M Otte;Ingmar Blümcke;Kees P J Braun

  • Electroclinical, MRI and neuropathological study of 10 patients with nodular heterotopia, with surgical outcomes

    L. Tassi;N. Colombo;M. Cossu;R. Mai

  • Type I focal cortical dysplasia: surgical outcome is related to histopathology

    Laura Tassi;Rita Garbelli;Nadia Colombo;Manuela Bramerio

  • Inhibitory circuits in human dysplastic tissue.

    R. Spreafico;L. Tassi;N. Colombo;M. Bramerio

  • Temporal lobe epilepsy: neuropathological and clinical correlations in 243 surgically treated patients

    Laura Tassi;Alessandra Meroni;Francesco Deleo;Flavio Villani

  • Electroclinical, MRI and surgical outcomes in 100 epileptic patients with type II FCD.

    Laura Tassi;Rita Garbelli;Nadia Colombo;Manuela Bramerio

  • Taylor's cortical dysplasia: a confocal and ultrastructural immunohistochemical study.

    Rita Garbelli;Claudio Munari;Silvia De Biasi;Laura Vitellaro-Zuccarello

  • Blurring in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical, high-field imaging and ultrastructural study.

    Rita Garbelli;Gloria Milesi;Valentina Medici;Flavio Villani

  • Cortical dysplasia : Electroclinical, imaging, and neuropathologic study of 13 patients

    Laura Tassi;Basile Pasquier;Lorella Minotti;Rita Garbelli

  • 7T MRI features in control human hippocampus and hippocampal sclerosis: an ex vivo study with histologic correlations.

    Roland Coras;Gloria Milesi;Ileana Zucca;Alfonso Mastropietro

  • Microanatomy of the dysplastic neocortex from epileptic patients

    L. Alonso-Nanclares;R. Garbelli;R. G. Sola;J. Pastor

  • Seizure progression and inflammatory mediators promote pericytosis and pericyte-microglia clustering at the cerebrovasculature.

    Wendy Klement;Rita Garbelli;Emma Zub;Laura Rossini

  • Toward a better definition of focal cortical dysplasia: An iterative histopathological and genetic agreement trial.

    Ingmar Blümcke;Ingmar Blümcke;Roland Coras;Robyn M Busch;Marcia Morita-Sherman

  • Immunocytochemical investigation on dysplastic human tissue from epileptic patients.

    Roberto Spreafico;Basile Pasquier;Lorella Minotti;Rita Garbelli

  • Type II focal cortical dysplasia: Ex vivo 7T magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities and histopathological comparisons.

    Ileana Zucca;Gloria Milesi;Valentina Medici;Laura Tassi

  • Short- and long-term surgical outcomes of temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis: Relationships with neuropathology.

    Francesco Deleo;Rita Garbelli;Gloria Milesi;Francesca Gozzo

  • Dendritic pathology, spine loss and synaptic reorganization in human cortex from epilepsy patients.

    Laura Rossini;Dalia De Santis;Roberta Rosa Mauceri;Chiara Tesoriero

  • Aquaporin 4 expression in control and epileptic human cerebral cortex

    Valentina Medici;Carolina Frassoni;Laura Tassi;Roberto Spreafico

  • Expression of connexin 43 in the human epileptic and drug-resistant cerebral cortex.

    R. Garbelli;C. Frassoni;D. F. Condorelli;A. Trovato Salinaro

  • A neuropathological, stereo-EEG, and MRI study of subcortical band heterotopia.

    R. Mai;L. Tassi;M. Cossu;S. Francione

  • Nodular heterotopia: a neuropathological study of 24 patients undergoing surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy.

    Alessandra Meroni;Carlo Galli;Manuela Bramerio;Laura Tassi

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Spreafico
Roberto Spreafico Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Laura Tassi
Laura Tassi University of Bologna
Flavio Villani
Flavio Villani Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Carolina Frassoni
Carolina Frassoni Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Francesco Cardinale
Francesco Cardinale University of Parma
Eleonora Aronica
Eleonora Aronica University of Amsterdam
Massimo Cossu
Massimo Cossu University of Sassari
Roberto Mai
Roberto Mai University of Milan
Marco de Curtis
Marco de Curtis Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Giorgio Lo Russo
Giorgio Lo Russo Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in neuroscience can open doors to a range of opportunities in healthcare, research, and technology. If you're looking for flexibility, consider online accelerated programs that allow you to earn your bachelor's degree faster and start your career sooner.

For students concerned about future earnings, neuroscience is often ranked among the degrees that pay well. The field also overlaps with some of the most lucrative majors, such as biomedical engineering and computer science, especially for those interested in brain research or neurotechnology.

Financing your education is another important factor. Many online school that accepts fafsa options are available, making it more affordable to earn your degree online. This flexibility and range of programs help you customize your career pathway and maximize your future potential in the neuroscience sector.

Best Scientists Citing Rita Garbelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles