World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
53
Citations
11269
World Ranking
900
National Ranking
432

Joseph L. Gastwirth publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph L. Gastwirth sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 237 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Joseph L. Gastwirth D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph L. Gastwirth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1985 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1971 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1970 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Joseph L. Gastwirth is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within economics, econometrics, finance, and social sciences, with notable focus on statistics and probability, economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, general health professions, and other related subfields.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • "A statistical examination of wealth inequality within the Forbes 400 richest families in the United States from 2000 to 2023," 2024, METRON
  • "Comparing the Secular Increasing Trend and Effect of the Response to the 2008 Financial Recession on Wealth Inequality in the U.S. with Other Nations Using the Median-based Gini Index," 2022, Journal of Quantitative Economics
  • "On Bootstrap Tests of Symmetry About an Unknown Median," 2021, Journal of Data Science
  • "On the capacity of the Gini index to represent income distributions," 2020, METRON
  • "On the interplay between practical and statistical significance in equal employment cases," 2021, Law Probability and Risk

Gastwirth has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Weiwen Miao, Qing Pan, Qing Shi, Barry I. Graubard, and Tian Zheng.

The research topics covered by Gastwirth include:

  • Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Economic Theory and Policy
  • Legal and Constitutional Studies
  • Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Gastwirth's frequent publication venues include:

  • Statistics and Public Policy
  • Law Probability and Risk
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • METRON
  • Journal of Data Science

The scientist has been recognized with several fellowships, including Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1985, Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1971, and Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 1970.

Best Publications

  • The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • The Impact of Levene’s Test of Equality of Variances on Statistical Theory and Practice

    Joseph L. Gastwirth;Yulia R. Gel;Weiwen Miao

  • A General Definition of the Lorenz Curve

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Asymptotic Distribution of Linear Combinations of Functions of Order Statistics with Applications to Estimation

    Herman Chernoff;Joseph L. Gastwirth;M. V. Johns

  • Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: power, sample size and robustness.

    Boris Freidlin;Gang Zheng;Zhaohai Li;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Non-parametric Statistical Methods

    Unknown

  • ON ROBUST PROCEDURES

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • A Scale-Free Goodness-Of-Fit Test for the Exponential Distribution Based on the Gini Statistic

    M. H. Gail;J. L. Gastwirth

  • Screening without a “Gold Standard”: The Hui-Walter Paradigm Revisited

    Wesley O. Johnson;Joseph L. Gastwirth;Larry M. Pearson

  • A robust modification of the Jarque–Bera test of normality

    Yulia R. Gel;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • The Use of Maximin Efficiency Robust Tests in Combining Contingency Tables and Survival Analysis

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • On a Simple Estimate of the Reciprocal of the Density Function

    Daniel A. Bloch;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Estimation of the prevalence of a rare disease, preserving the anonymity of the subjects by group testing: application to estimating the prevalence of aids antibodies in blood donors

    Joseph L. Gastwirth;Patricia A. Hammick

  • The Statistical Precision of Medical Screening Procedures: Application to Polygraph and AIDS Antibodies Test Data

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • lawstat: An R Package for Law, Public Policy and Biostatistics

    Wallace Hui;Yulia R. Gel;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • The Behavior of Robust Estimators on Dependent Data

    Herman Rubin;Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Dual and simultaneous sensitivity analysis for matched pairs

    Joseph L. Gastwirth;Abba M. Krieger;Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • Screening with Cost-Effective Quality Control: Potential Applications to HIV and Drug Testing

    J. L. Gastwirth;Wesley O. Johnson

  • Percentile Modifications of Two Sample Rank Tests

    Joseph L. Gastwirth

  • Robust Genomic Control for Association Studies

    Gang Zheng;Boris Freidlin;Joseph L. Gastwirth

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Rosenbaum
Paul R. Rosenbaum University of Pennsylvania
Mitchell H. Gail
Mitchell H. Gail National Institutes of Health
Barry I. Graubard
Barry I. Graubard National Institutes of Health
Wesley O. Johnson
Wesley O. Johnson University of California, Irvine
Barry C. Arnold
Barry C. Arnold University of California, Riverside
Dylan S. Small
Dylan S. Small University of Pennsylvania
Jane-Ling Wang
Jane-Ling Wang University of California, Davis
Nozer D. Singpurwalla
Nozer D. Singpurwalla George Washington University
Ričardas Zitikis
Ričardas Zitikis University of Western Ontario
Cyrus R. Mehta
Cyrus R. Mehta Cytel (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, expanding skills through related online degrees can open many career pathways. Many graduates pursue advanced business knowledge through an online MBA with transfer credits accepted. This option is especially attractive for those wanting to combine analytical expertise with leadership skills.

Data-driven roles complement mathematical backgrounds well, making a masters data analytics degree a strong choice. This path emphasizes statistics and computational techniques applied to real-world problems.

When considering graduate programs, it’s important to find one that fits your profile. Resources about what MBA programs can I get into help students identify accessible programs aligned with their goals and qualifications.

For those balancing work and study, pursuing the easiest MBA program online can provide flexibility without sacrificing educational value. This route supports career advancement while accommodating busy schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph L. Gastwirth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles