World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
42
Citations
11397
World Ranking
1754
National Ranking
751

Cyrus R. Mehta publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cyrus R. Mehta sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 124 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Cyrus R. Mehta D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cyrus R. Mehta sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Best Publications

  • A Network Algorithm for Performing Fisher's Exact Test in r × c Contingency Tables

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel

  • Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial

    Faiez Zannad;Christopher P Cannon;William C Cushman;George L Bakris

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Oral Propranolol in Infantile Hemangioma

    Christine Léauté-Labrèze;Peter Hoeger;Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier;Laurent Guibaud

  • Exact logistic regression: Theory and examples

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel

  • Computing an Exact Confidence Interval for the Common Odds Ratio in Several 2×2 Contingency Tables

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel;Robert Gray

  • Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials

    Deepak L Bhatt;Cyrus Mehta

  • Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples.

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Stuart J. Pocock

  • Exact significance testing to establish treatment equivalence with ordered categorical data.

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel;Anastasios A. Tsiatis

  • Computing Distributions for Exact Logistic Regression

    Karim F. Hirji;Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel

  • ALGORITHM 643: FEXACT: a FORTRAN subroutine for Fisher's exact test on unordered r×c contingency tables

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel

  • Exact confidence intervals following a group sequential test.

    Anastasios A. Tsiatis;Gary L. Rosner;Cyrus R. Mehta

  • A network algorithm for performing Fisher's exact test in rxc contingency tables

    C. R. Mehta

  • Vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (VALOR): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study.

    Farhad Ravandi;Ellen K. Ritchie;Hamid Sayar;Jeffrey E. Lancet

  • Exact Inference for Contingency Tables with Ordered Categories

    Alan Agresti;Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel

  • The future of drug development: advancing clinical trial design

    John Orloff;Frank Douglas;Jose Pinheiro;Susan Levinson

  • Computing an Exact Confidence Interval for the Common Odds Ratio in Several 2 × 2 Contingency Tables

    Unknown

  • Sample size re-estimation for adaptive sequential design in clinical trials.

    Ping Gao;James H Ware;Cyrus Mehta

  • Optimizing trial design: sequential, adaptive, and enrichment strategies.

    Cyrus Mehta;Ping Gao;Deepak L. Bhatt;Robert A. Harrington

  • Efficient Monte Carlo Methods for Conditional Logistic Regression

    Cyrus R. Mehta;Nitin R. Patel;Pralay Senchaudhuri

  • Median Unbiased Estimation for Binary Data

    Karim F. Hirji;Anastasios A. Tsiatis;Cyrus R. Mehta

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. White
William B. White University of Connecticut
Christopher P. Cannon
Christopher P. Cannon Brigham and Women's Hospital
George L. Bakris
George L. Bakris University of Chicago
Faiez Zannad
Faiez Zannad University of Lorraine
William C. Cushman
William C. Cushman University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Simon Heller
Simon Heller University of Sheffield
Anastasios A. Tsiatis
Anastasios A. Tsiatis North Carolina State University
Steven E. Nissen
Steven E. Nissen Cleveland Clinic
Ajit C. Tamhane
Ajit C. Tamhane Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in mathematics, expanding skills through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For instance, pursuing shortest online MBA programs offers a quick pathway to leadership roles, blending analytical expertise with business acumen.

Additionally, a masters in marketing can complement mathematical skills with strategic insights, particularly valuable in data-driven marketing careers. These programs provide an affordable way to boost earning potential while gaining practical experience.

Many professionals seek efficiency, and one year MBA programs are ideal for individuals aiming to advance swiftly without prolonged breaks in their careers. These programs integrate well with mathematics backgrounds, offering applied business knowledge in a condensed timeframe.

Moreover, flexibility in education can be enhanced by understanding whether can you transfer MBA programs is possible. This option allows students to make the most of prior coursework and potentially reduce the duration and cost of completing an MBA.

Best Scientists Citing Cyrus R. Mehta

Recently Published Articles