World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5825 5413 3159 2865 161 13529

Camilo J. Ruggero publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Camilo J. Ruggero between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Camilo J. Ruggero published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2022. 30 of the 197 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2022. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 12 publications
2004 2025

197 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Camilo J. Ruggero: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 11
2011 6
2012 4
2013 11
2014 8
2015 5
2016 6
2017 13
2018 14
2019 14
2020 11
2021 17
2022 19
2023 12
2024 18
2025 12
Total 197
Download as CSV

Camilo J. Ruggero publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camilo J. Ruggero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 161 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 161
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Camilo J. Ruggero D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Camilo J. Ruggero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Camilo J. Ruggero is affiliated with the University of North Texas in the United States and focuses on research in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, philosophy, and psychiatry and mental health. The volume of publications indicates a primary emphasis on psychology with a significant number of contributions across these related disciplines.

The main themes in Camilo J. Ruggero's research include sleep and related disorders, sleep and work-related fatigue, mental health research topics, personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health and psychiatry, posttraumatic stress disorder research, and sleep and wakefulness research.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • SLEEP
  • Clinical Psychological Science
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset

Key recent papers associated with Ruggero's research focus on hierarchical and quantitative models of psychopathology as well as mental health treatment accessibility. These papers include:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence (2021), published in Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research (2022), published in Psychological Medicine
  • A Detailed Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology: From Individual Symptoms up to the General Factor of Psychopathology (2021), published in Clinical Psychological Science
  • eHealth to redress psychotherapy access barriers both new and old: A review of reviews and meta-analyses (2020), published in Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
  • The Course of General Cognitive Ability in Individuals With Psychotic Disorders (2022), published in JAMA Psychiatry

Regular collaborators in Ruggero's research include Danica C. Slavish, Roman Kotov, Jessica R. Dietch, Daniel J. Taylor, and Brett Messman. The collaboration counts indicate sustained and repeated joint contributions across multiple projects.

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire.

    Wakiza Gámez;Michael Chmielewski;Roman Kotov;Camilo Ruggero

  • The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: development and initial validation.

    Wakiza Gámez;Michael Chmielewski;Roman Kotov;Camilo Ruggero

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • Development and validation of new anxiety and bipolar symptom scales for an expanded version of the IDAS (the IDAS-II).

    David Watson;Michael W. O’Hara;Kristin Naragon-Gainey;Erin Koffel

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • New dimensions in the quantitative classification of mental illness.

    Roman Kotov;Camilo J. Ruggero;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Developing Brief Scales for Use in Clinical Practice: The Reliability and Validity of Single-Item Self-Report Measures of Depression Symptom Severity, Psychosocial Impairment Due to Depression, and Quality of Life

    Mark Zimmerman;Camilo J. Ruggero;Iwona Chelminski;Diane Young

  • Diagnostic Shifts During the Decade Following First Admission for Psychosis

    Evelyn J. Bromet;Roman Kotov;Laura J. Fochtmann;Gabrielle A. Carlson

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Life events as predictors of mania and depression in bipolar I disorder.

    Sheri L. Johnson;Amy K. Cueller;Camilo Ruggero;Carol Winett-Perlman

  • Is bipolar disorder overdiagnosed

    Mark Zimmerman;Camilo J. Ruggero;Iwona Chelminski;Diane Young

  • Borderline personality disorder and the misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Mark Zimmerman;Iwona Chelminski;Diane Young

  • Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Responses to Reward: Links with Hypomanic Symptoms

    Sheri L. Johnson;Camilo J. Ruggero;Charles S. Carver

  • Coping, Family Social Support, and Psychological Symptoms Among Student Veterans

    Daniel H. Romero;Shelley A. Riggs;Camilo Ruggero

  • Long-term Changes in Cognitive Functioning in Individuals With Psychotic Disorders: Findings From the Suffolk County Mental Health Project

    Anne Kathrin J. Fett;Anne Kathrin J. Fett;Anne Kathrin J. Fett;Eva Velthorst;Abraham Reichenberg;Abraham Reichenberg;Camilo J. Ruggero

  • A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Sleep and Daytime Functioning in College Students

    Daniel J. Taylor;Marian R. Zimmerman;Christie E. Gardner;Jacob M. Williams

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) in psychiatric practice and research

    Unknown

  • Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5.

    Douglas B. Samuel;Christopher J. Hopwood;Robert F. Krueger;Katherine M. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Jennifer L. Callahan
Jennifer L. Callahan University of North Texas
Daniel J. Taylor
Daniel J. Taylor University of Arizona
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Mark Zimmerman
Mark Zimmerman Brown University
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Benjamin J. Luft
Benjamin J. Luft Stony Brook University
Evelyn J. Bromet
Evelyn J. Bromet Stony Brook University
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University
David C. Cicero
David C. Cicero University of North Texas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens up a diverse range of career pathways, including roles in counseling, clinical therapy, research, and education. Many students consider advancing to become a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), which requires meeting specific licensure standards that can differ by state.

If you plan to practice counseling in New York, you will need to navigate how to get an lpc license in New York, which includes educational, examination, and supervised experience components. Similarly, professionals interested in working in North Carolina should review the North Carolina lpc licensure requirements to understand the necessary qualifications.

If North Dakota is your target location, it’s important to stay informed about the North Dakota licensed professional counselor requirements, which outline unique state standards. Additionally, those looking to practice in the Midwest should familiarize themselves with the Ohio lpc licensure requirements.

With many online psychology degrees available, students can meet educational prerequisites for licensure while maintaining flexibility. The path you choose will depend on your state’s requirements and your professional interests.

Best Scientists Citing Camilo J. Ruggero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles