World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5407 5021 563 533 148 11189
Neuroscience 50 5678 5223 462 420 148 11189

Caroline Catmur publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caroline Catmur between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caroline Catmur published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 20 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caroline Catmur: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 0
2011 4
2012 3
2013 5
2014 7
2015 11
2016 16
2017 8
2018 13
2019 18
2020 13
2021 20
2022 6
2023 6
2024 11
2025 9
Total 158
Download as CSV

Caroline Catmur publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Catmur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Caroline Catmur D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Catmur sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Caroline Catmur is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans neuroscience and psychology, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Catmur's work also touches on social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Catmur has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in the following venues:

  • Cognition
  • Cortex
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Defining key concepts for mental state attribution," 2024, Communications Psychology
  • "What Happened to Mirror Neurons?", 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Measuring interoception: The phase adjustment task," 2021, Biological Psychology
  • "The role of alexithymia in social cognition: Evidence from a non-clinical population," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "The relationship between alexithymia and theory of mind: A systematic review," 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Catmur frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Geoffrey Bird, Mirta Stantić, Jennifer Murphy, Jane Conway, and Hélio Clemente Cuve.

Best Publications

  • Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system.

    Caroline Catmur;Vincent Walsh;Cecilia Heyes

  • Mirror neurons: from origin to function

    Richard Cook;Geoffrey Bird;Caroline Catmur;Clare Press

  • Theory of Mind Is Not Theory of Emotion: A Cautionary Note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test

    Beth Oakley;Rebecca Jane Brewer;Geoffrey Bird;Caroline Catmur

  • Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome.

    Sarah-Jayne Blakemore;Teresa Tavassoli;Susana Calò;Richard M. Thomas

  • Enhancing Social Ability by Stimulating Right Temporoparietal Junction

    Idalmis Santiesteban;Michael J. Banissy;Michael J. Banissy;Caroline Catmur;Geoffrey Bird;Geoffrey Bird

  • Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception.

    Steve Guest;Caroline Catmur;Donna Lloyd;Charles Spence

  • Interoception and psychopathology: A developmental neuroscience perspective

    Jennifer Murphy;Rebecca Brewer;Caroline Catmur;Geoffrey Bird

  • Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system.

    Caroline Catmur;Vincent Walsh;Cecilia Heyes

  • Alexithymia, not autism, is associated with impaired interoception

    Punit Shah;Richard Hall;Caroline Catmur;Geoffrey Bird;Geoffrey Bird

  • Avatars and arrows: implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing?

    Idalmis Santiesteban;Caroline Catmur;Senan Coughlan Hopkins;Geoffrey Bird

  • Alexithymia is associated with a multidomain, multidimensional failure of interoception: Evidence from novel tests.

    Jennifer Murphy;Caroline Catmur;Geoffrey Bird

  • Can neurotypical individuals read autistic facial expressions? atypical production of emotional facial expressions in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Rebecca Brewer;Federica Biotti;Caroline Catmur;Clare Press

  • Attention does not modulate neural responses to social stimuli in autism spectrum disorders.

    Geoffrey Bird;Caroline Catmur;Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Christopher D. Frith

  • What Happened to Mirror Neurons

    Cecilia Heyes;Caroline Catmur

  • Through the looking glass: counter‐mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning

    Caroline Catmur;Helge Gillmeister;Helge Gillmeister;Geoffrey Bird;Roman Liepelt

  • Testing the independence of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention.

    Jennifer Joanne Murphy;Rebecca Jane Brewer;David Plans;Sahib Khalsa;Sahib Khalsa

  • Classifying individual differences in interoception: Implications for the measurement of interoceptive awareness.

    Jennifer Murphy;Caroline Catmur;Geoffrey Bird;Geoffrey Bird

  • Is alexithymia characterised by impaired interoception? Further evidence, the importance of control variables, and the problems with the Heartbeat Counting Task

    Jennifer Murphy;Rebecca Brewer;Hannah Hobson;Caroline Catmur

  • Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility.

    Caroline Catmur;Cecilia Heyes

  • Are we really measuring empathy? Proposal for a new measurement framework.

    Michel-Pierre Coll;Michel-Pierre Coll;Essi Viding;Markus Rütgen;Giorgia Silani

  • Making mirrors: Premotor cortex stimulation enhances mirror and counter-mirror motor facilitation

    Caroline Catmur;Rogier B. Mars;Matthew F. Rushworth;Cecilia Heyes;Cecilia Heyes

  • The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in the Control of Imitation

    Sophie Sowden;Caroline Catmur

  • The 20 item prosopagnosia index (PI20): relationship with the Glasgow face-matching test.

    Punit Shah;Sophie Sowden;Anne Gaule;Caroline Catmur

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey Bird
Geoffrey Bird University of Oxford
Cecilia Heyes
Cecilia Heyes University of Oxford
Michael J. Banissy
Michael J. Banissy Goldsmiths University of London
Clare Press
Clare Press Birkbeck, University of London
Richard J. Cook
Richard J. Cook University of Waterloo
Francesca Happé
Francesca Happé King's College London
Jennifer Y. F. Lau
Jennifer Y. F. Lau Queen Mary University of London
Cristina Becchio
Cristina Becchio Italian Institute of Technology
Giorgia Silani
Giorgia Silani University of Vienna
Sahib S. Khalsa
Sahib S. Khalsa Laureate Institute for Brain Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re excited about studying neuroscience in the USA, it’s helpful to explore closely related online degree paths. Many students interested in the brain and behavior also consider fields like psychology, counseling, or therapy.

For those interested in counseling, there are a number of cacrep accredited programs online that meet professional standards and open the door to licensure. If affordability is a top priority, several online counseling programs offer flexible options for working students or those with busy schedules.

Students considering marriage and family support roles can look into marriage and family therapy master's programs. These degrees are valuable for those who wish to provide therapeutic support for couples, families, and children.

Finally, a broad pathway for neuroscience students is a graduate degree in psychology. There are reputable and affordable masters programs in psychology that can prepare you for research, teaching, or clinical work.

Exploring these related programs can help neuroscience graduates find diverse, rewarding career options in mental health, research, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Catmur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles