World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
8731
World Ranking
8456
National Ranking
163

Tie-Qiang Li publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tie-Qiang Li sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tie-Qiang Li D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tie-Qiang Li sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR.

    Gary H. Glover;Tie-Qiang Li;David Ress

  • High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase

    Jeff H. Duyn;Peter van Gelderen;Tie-Qiang Li;Jacco A. de Zwart

  • Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data

    Karin Shmueli;Jacco A. de Zwart;Peter van Gelderen;Tie-Qiang Li

  • Layer-specific variation of iron content in cerebral cortex as a source of MRI contrast

    Masaki Fukunaga;Tie-Qiang Li;Peter van Gelderen;Jacco A. de Zwart

  • Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI.

    Stefan Skare;Maj Hedehus;Michael E Moseley;Tie-Qiang Li

  • From part- to whole-body ownership in the multisensory brain.

    Valeria I. Petkova;Malin Björnsdotter;Giovanni Gentile;Tomas Jonsson

  • Susceptibility Contrast in High Field MRI of Human Brain as a Function of Tissue Iron Content

    Bing Yao;Tie-Qiang Li;Peter van Gelderen;Karin Shmueli

  • Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted MRI: Influence of Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis on the DWI/PWI Mismatch in Acute Stroke

    Tobias Neumann-Haefelin;Hans-Jörg Wittsack;Gereon R. Fink;Frank Wenserski

  • Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy

    Stefan Skare;Tie-Qiang Li;Bo Nordell;Martin Ingvar

  • Media violence exposure and executive functioning in aggressive and control adolescents

    William G. Kronenberger;Vincent P. Mathews;David W. Dunn;Yanfu Wang

  • Extensive heterogeneity in white matter intensity in high-resolution T2*-weighted MRI of the human brain at 7.0 T.

    Tie-Qiang Li;Peter van Gelderen;Hellmut Merkle;S. Lalith Talagala

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Regional Cerebral Blood Oxygenation Changes During Breath Holding

    Andreas Kastrup;Tie-Qiang Li;Atsuchi Takahashi;Gary H. Glover

  • Cerebral blood flow-related signal changes during breath-holding

    Andreas Kastrup;Tie-Qiang Li;Gary H. Glover;Michael E. Moseley

  • Functional MRI of Human Brain during Breath Holding by BOLD and FAIR Techniques

    Tie-Qiang Li;Andreas Kastrup;Atsushi M. Takahashi;Michael E. Moseley

  • Increased extracellular brain water after coronary artery bypass grafting is avoided by off-pump surgery

    Russell E. Anderson;Tie-Qiang Li;Thomas Hindmarsh;Göran Settergren

  • Post mTBI fatigue is associated with abnormal brain functional connectivity

    Love Engström Nordin;Marika Christina Möller;Marika Christina Möller;Per Julin;Aniko Bartfai

  • Characterization of T(2)* heterogeneity in human brain white matter.

    Tie-Qiang Li;Bing Yao;Peter van Gelderen;Hellmut Merkle

  • The contribution of chemical exchange to MRI frequency shifts in brain tissue.

    Karin Shmueli;Stephen J. Dodd;Tie-Qiang Li;Jeff H. Duyn

  • Default mode network, motor network, dorsal and ventral basal ganglia networks in the rat brain: comparison to human networks using resting state-fMRI.

    Adam Sierakowiak;Cyril Monnot;Sahar Nikkhou Aski;Martin Uppman

  • Three-year changes in leisure activities are associated with concurrent changes in white matter microstructure and perceptual speed in individuals aged 80 years and older

    Ylva Köhncke;Erika J. Laukka;Yvonne Brehmer;Yvonne Brehmer;Grégoria Kalpouzos

  • Report From Part- to Whole-Body Ownership in the Multisensory Brain

    Valeria I. Petkova;Giovanni Gentile;Tomas Jonsson;Tie-Qiang Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Moseley
Michael E. Moseley Stanford University
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Martin Lövdén
Martin Lövdén University of Gothenburg
Jeff H. Duyn
Jeff H. Duyn National Institutes of Health
Lars-Olof Wahlund
Lars-Olof Wahlund Karolinska Institute
Lars Bäckman
Lars Bäckman Karolinska Institute
Jacco A. de Zwart
Jacco A. de Zwart National Institutes of Health
Laura Fratiglioni
Laura Fratiglioni Karolinska Institute
Alan P. Koretsky
Alan P. Koretsky National Institutes of Health
Hans Forssberg
Hans Forssberg Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are numerous related online degrees and career pathways worth considering. Many students choose to broaden their impact in the health sciences or mental health fields by earning a degree online, which can offer more flexibility and affordability compared to traditional campus programs.

Popular options include msw accelerated programs for those interested in social work and mental health advocacy. Similarly, if you’re drawn to the foundations of human behavior, the best online psychology degree programs provide a fast track to careers in therapy, research, or academia.

For those aiming to become licensed counselors, choosing from cacrep-accredited programs online is essential to ensure your education meets professional standards. If affordability is a priority, you may want to explore online mental health degree programs that offer comprehensive training at a lower cost.

Each of these degree paths can complement a neuroscience background and open various career opportunities in healthcare, counseling, education, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Tie-Qiang Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles