World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael E. Moseley

Michael E. Moseley

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
46353
World Ranking
5752
National Ranking
3091

Michael E. Moseley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Moseley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 406 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael E. Moseley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Moseley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael E. Moseley is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical imaging, specifically within radiology and related medical specialties. Their research portfolio includes significant work on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and their applications in various clinical scenarios.

Their research spans several key topics, including:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes

Moseley's work is predominantly situated within the broad field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging, supported by contributions also intersecting Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, and Rheumatology.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • Radiology
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Several notable papers associated directly with Michael E. Moseley's research include:

  • Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weighted and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats, 2024, American Journal of Neuroradiology

Other recent influential papers within their research network, though not authored by Moseley themselves, reflect interconnected topics and fields of study:

  • In vivo imaging of nanoparticle-labeled CAR T cells, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post-cardiac arrest coma, 2020, Neurology
  • Automatic Lung Nodule Segmentation and Intra-Nodular Heterogeneity Image Generation, 2021, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
  • Therapy Response Assessment of Pediatric Tumors with Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/MRI, 2020, Radiology

Michael E. Moseley collaborates frequently with researchers such as Moss Zhao, Greg Zaharchuk, Kristen W. Yeom, Gary K. Steinberg, and Elizabeth Tong, with each coauthor contributing to multiple joint publications. This network highlights the interdisciplinary and collaborative nature of their research environment.

Best Publications

  • An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Ralph L. Sacco;Scott E. Kasner;Joseph P. Broderick;Louis R. Caplan

  • Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy.

    M. E. Moseley;Y. Cohen;J. Mintorovitch;L. Chileuitt

  • Iron oxide nanoparticles inhibit tumour growth by inducing pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization in tumour tissues

    Saeid Zanganeh;Gregor Hutter;Ryan Spitler;Olga Lenkov

  • Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system.

    M E Moseley;Y Cohen;J Kucharczyk;J Mintorovitch

  • Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study.

    Gregory W. Albers;Vincent N. Thijs;Lawrence Wechsler;Stephanie Kemp

  • Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weighted and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats.

    M E Moseley;J Kucharczyk;J Mintorovitch;Y Cohen

  • Microstructure of temporo-parietal white matter as a basis for reading ability: evidence from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging.

    Torkel Klingberg;Maj Hedehus;Elise Temple;Talya Salz

  • Age-related decline in brain white matter anisotropy measured with spatially corrected echo-planar diffusion tensor imaging.

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan;Maj Hedehus;Kelvin O. Lim

  • Myelination and organization of the frontal white matter in children: a diffusion tensor MRI study.

    T. Klingberg;C. J. Vaidya;J. D. E. Gabrieli;M. E. Moseley

  • Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of ischemic stroke

    H. L. Lutsep;G. W. Albers;A. Decrespigny;G. N. Kamat

  • Comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats

    J. Mintorovitch;M. E. Moseley;L. Chileuitt;H. Shimizu

  • White matter changes in mild cognitive impairment and AD: A diffusion tensor imaging study.

    David Medina;Leyla deToledo-Morrell;Fabio Urresta;John D.E. Gabrieli;John D.E. Gabrieli

  • Compromised white matter tract integrity in schizophrenia inferred from diffusion tensor imaging.

    Kelvin O. Lim;Kelvin O. Lim;Maj Hedehus;Michael Moseley;Alexander de Crespigny

  • Correlation of perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI with NIHSS score in acute (<6.5 hour) ischemic stroke

    D. C. Tong;M. A. Yenari;G. W. Albers;M. O'Brien

  • Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of perfusion and diffusion in stroke: Evolution of lesion volume and correlation with clinical outcome

    Christian Beaulieu;Alexander De Crespigny;David C. Tong;Michael E. Moseley

  • Serial MRI After Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats Dynamics of Tissue Injury, Blood-Brain Barrier Damage, and Edema Formation

    T. Neumann-Haefelin;A. Kastrup;A. de Crespigny;M. A. Yenari

  • Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain: value of differentiating between extraaxial cysts and epidermoid tumors.

    J S Tsuruda;W M Chew;M E Moseley;D Norman

  • Equivalent disruption of regional white matter microstructure in ageing healthy men and women.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Elfar Adalsteinsson;Maj Hedehus;Catherine Ju

  • MRI abnormalities associated with partial status epilepticus.

    M.G. Lansberg;M.W. O’Brien;A.M. Norbash;M.E. Moseley

  • An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Endorsed by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons

    Ralph L. Sacco;Scott E. Kasner;Joseph P. Broderick;Louis R. Caplan

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland Bammer
Roland Bammer Monash University
Gregory W. Albers
Gregory W. Albers Stanford University
Michael P. Marks
Michael P. Marks Stanford University
Vincent Thijs
Vincent Thijs Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Thomas L. James
Thomas L. James University of California, San Francisco
Gary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover Stanford University
Joachim Röther
Joachim Röther Asklepios Klinik Altona
Midori A. Yenari
Midori A. Yenari University of California, San Francisco
Tie-Qiang Li
Tie-Qiang Li Karolinska University Hospital
Chunlei Liu
Chunlei Liu University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of related fields and online study options. If you're interested in the administrative side of healthcare, online health administration programs offer flexible learning for future healthcare leaders seeking to fast-track their careers.

For registered nurses aiming to become family nurse practitioners, specialized bridge programs like adn to fnp programs can help advance your practice while studying online.

There are also opportunities for those interested in nutrition and wellness. Pursuing a nutritionist online degree can lead to roles in health education, community outreach, or clinical nutrition support.

For those seeking top-tier credentials, exploring the best online mha programs provides access to CAHME-accredited options recognized throughout the healthcare industry.

Each of these online pathways can complement your journey in medicine or offer a fulfilling parallel healthcare career track with flexible online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Moseley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles