World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patricia J. Erwin

Patricia J. Erwin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6871 6460 3624 3359 268 96851

Patricia J. Erwin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia J. Erwin between 2002 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia J. Erwin published across 23 years, from 2002 to 2024, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2013. 1 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2013. 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2002 2024

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia J. Erwin: publications per year, 2002 to 2024
Year Publications
2002 4
2003 4
2004 4
2005 3
2006 2
2007 8
2008 17
2009 13
2010 16
2011 15
2012 24
2013 29
2014 22
2015 18
2016 20
2017 21
2018 11
2019 12
2020 17
2021 6
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 269
Download as CSV

Patricia J. Erwin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia J. Erwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 268 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 268
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia J. Erwin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia J. Erwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia J. Erwin is affiliated with Mayo Clinic in the United States and has a research focus mainly within the field of Medicine, with specific attention to epidemiology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, general health professions, surgery, and emergency medicine. Their research output comprises 43 publications in medicine, with noteworthy contributions across several specialized subfields.

Their work covers diverse topics including:

  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Patricia J. Erwin has published in several recurrent academic venues, indicating a consistent presence in the dermatology and cardiology research communities. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC Heart Failure
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Heart

Notable recent papers by Patricia J. Erwin include:

  • Health Literacy and Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure, 2020, JACC Heart Failure
  • Interventions to improve older adults' Emergency Department patient experience: A systematic review, 2020, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Endocarditis risk with bioprosthetic and mechanical valves: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Heart
  • Educational programs to teach shared decision making to medical trainees: A systematic review, 2020, Patient Education and Counseling
  • Association of Thyroid Function with Suicidal Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2021, Medicina

Collaborations with frequent coauthors are part of their research activity. Key collaborators include:

  • M. Hassan Murad
  • Jerry D. Brewer
  • Mohammed Al-Sadawi
  • Farzane Saeidifard
  • Adam S. Budzikowski

Best Publications

  • Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Rafael Lozano;Mohsen Naghavi;Kyle Foreman;Stephen Lim

  • Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Christopher J.L. Murray;Theo Vos;Rafael Lozano;Mohsen Naghavi

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Stephen S. Lim;Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Goodarz Danaei

  • Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Mohsen Naghavi;Rafael Lozano

  • Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events and Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies

    Apoor S. Gami;Brandi J. Witt;Daniel E. Howard;Patricia J. Erwin

  • Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Physician Burnout: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Colin Patrick West;Liselotte (Lotte) Dyrbye;Patricia J. Erwin;Tait D. Shanafelt

  • Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    David A. Cook;Rose Hatala;Ryan Brydges;Benjamin Zendejas

  • Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

    David A. Cook;Anthony J. Levinson;Sarah Garside;Denise M. Dupras

  • Patient engagement in research: a systematic review

    Juan Pablo Domecq;Gabriela Prutsky;Tarig Elraiyah;Zhen Wang

  • Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    D. O. Okorodudu;M. F. Jumean;V. M. Montori;A. Romero-Corral

  • Adverse Effects of Testosterone Therapy in Adult Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    M. Mercè Fernández-Balsells;Mohammad Hassan Murad;Melanie Lane;Juliana F. Lampropulos

  • Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review

    Victor M. Montori;P. J. Devereaux;Neill K. J. Adhikari;Neill K. J. Adhikari;Karen E. A. Burns;Karen E. A. Burns

  • Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    David A. Cook;Stanley J. Hamstra;Ryan Brydges;Benjamin Zendejas

  • Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Aaron L. Leppin;Michael R. Gionfriddo;Maya Kessler;Juan Pablo Brito

  • Posttransplantation diabetes: a systematic review of the literature.

    Victor M. Montori;Ananda Basu;Patricia J. Erwin;Jorge A. Velosa

  • Hormonal therapy and sex reassignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life and psychosocial outcomes.

    Mohammad Hassan Murad;Mohamed B. Elamin;Magaly Zumaeta Garcia;Rebecca J. Mullan

  • Instructional Design Variations in Internet-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    David A. Cook;Anthony J. Levinson;Sarah Garside;Denise M. Dupras

  • Association of mediterranean diet with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Balwinder Singh;Ajay K. Parsaik;Michelle M. Mielke;Patricia J. Erwin

  • Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Mohamed B. Elamin;Nisrin O. Abu Elnour;Khalid B. Elamin;Mitra M. Fatourechi

  • Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework

    Nathan D. Shippee;Juan Pablo Domecq Garces;Juan Pablo Domecq Garces;Gabriela J. Prutsky Lopez;Gabriela J. Prutsky Lopez;Zhen Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry M. Baddour
Larry M. Baddour Mayo Clinic
David A. Cook
David A. Cook Mayo Clinic
Matthias Briel
Matthias Briel University Hospital of Basel
George A. Mensah
George A. Mensah National Institutes of Health
Richard Matzopoulos
Richard Matzopoulos South African Medical Research Council
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a doctor. The U.S. offers a wide variety of online healthcare degrees and career tracks, allowing students to build practical skills and enter the workforce more quickly.

For those looking to begin their careers fast, lpn program options provide a direct route to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse, combining flexible study and hands-on clinical experience. Meanwhile, mental health professionals can advance their expertise through highly flexible online msn pmhnp programs designed for nurses seeking specialized psychiatric roles.

The business side of healthcare is also booming. If you enjoy leadership and administration, earning a healthcare administration degree online can open doors to management roles in hospitals or clinics. For further career growth, consider the cheapest mha programs to gain advanced skills while minimizing costs.

These online pathways offer flexible and affordable entry points to vital health careers, each addressing different interests within the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia J. Erwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles