World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
35997
World Ranking
10789
National Ranking
5551

Kurt R. Stenmark publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt R. Stenmark sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 560 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kurt R. Stenmark D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt R. Stenmark sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Kurt R. Stenmark is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work also spans subfields including Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cancer Research, and Immunology.

The scientist's research encompasses several main topics, among which Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments is the most prominent. Other notable areas include Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism; Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors; Extracellular vesicles in disease; MicroRNA in disease regulation; Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology; and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research.

Stenmark has contributed extensively to several academic journals. Frequent venues of publication include:

  • American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Pulmonary Circulation
  • American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Stenmark include:

  • "U-shaped association of uric acid to overall-cause mortality and its impact on clinical management of hyperuricemia," 2022, Redox Biology
  • "17β-estradiol and estrogen receptor α protect right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension via BMPR2 and apelin," 2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "Clickable decellularized extracellular matrix as a new tool for building hybrid-hydrogels to model chronic fibrotic diseases in vitro," 2020, Journal of Materials Chemistry B
  • "Pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension: current insights and future directions," 2024, European Respiratory Journal
  • "Potential long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the pulmonary vasculature: a global perspective," 2021, Nature Reviews Cardiology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with co-authors such as Rubin M. Tuder, Cheng-Jun Hu, Claudia Mickael, Eva Nozik-Grayck, and Sushil Kumar.

Kurt R. Stenmark is recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Cellular and molecular pathobiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Marc Humbert;Nicholas W. Morrell;Stephen L. Archer;Kurt R. Stenmark

  • Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms

    Kurt R. Stenmark;Karen A. Fagan;Maria G. Frid

  • Cellular and molecular basis of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Nicholas W. Morrell;Serge Adnot;Stephen L. Archer;Jocelyn Dupuis

  • Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension: Guidelines From the American Heart Association and American Thoracic Society

    Steven H. Abman;Georg Hansmann;Stephen L. Archer;D. Dunbar Ivy

  • Pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension: state of the art and research perspectives.

    Marc Humbert;Marc Humbert;Christophe Guignabert;Christophe Guignabert;Sébastien Bonnet;Peter Dorfmüller;Peter Dorfmüller

  • Animal models of pulmonary arterial hypertension: the hope for etiological discovery and pharmacological cure

    Kurt R. Stenmark;Barbara Meyrick;Nazzareno Galie;Wolter J. Mooi

  • Inflammation, growth factors, and pulmonary vascular remodeling.

    Paul M. Hassoun;Luc Mouthon;Joan A. Barberà;Saadia Eddahibi

  • Relevant issues in the pathology and pathobiology of pulmonary hypertension

    Rubin M Tuder;Stephen L Archer;Peter Dorfmüller;Serpil C Erzurum

  • Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha–dependent induction of FoxP3 drives regulatory T-cell abundance and function during inflammatory hypoxia of the mucosa

    Eric T. Clambey;Eóin N. McNamee;Joseph A. Westrich;Louise E. Glover

  • Temporal, spatial, and oxygen-regulated expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in the lung

    Aimee Y. Yu;Maria G. Frid;Larissa A. Shimoda;Charles M. Wiener

  • Mature vascular endothelium can give rise to smooth muscle cells via endothelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation: in vitro analysis.

    Maria G. Frid;Vishakha A. Kale;Kurt R. Stenmark

  • Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling Requires Recruitment of Circulating Mesenchymal Precursors of a Monocyte/Macrophage Lineage

    Maria G. Frid;Jacqueline A. Brunetti;Danielle L. Burke;Todd C. Carpenter

  • The Adventitia: Essential Regulator of Vascular Wall Structure and Function

    Kurt R. Stenmark;Michael E. Yeager;Karim C. El Kasmi;Eva Nozik-Grayck

  • CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF PULMONARY VASCULAR REMODELING

    K. R. Stenmark;R. P. Mecham

  • Lung vascular development: implications for the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

    Kurt R. Stenmark;Steven H. Abman

  • Perspectives on endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition: potential contribution to vascular remodeling in chronic pulmonary hypertension.

    Enrique Arciniegas;Maria G. Frid;Ivor Samuel Douglas;Kurt R. Stenmark

  • Role of the Adventitia in Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling

    Kurt R. Stenmark;Neil Davie;Maria Frid;Evgenia Gerasimovskaya

  • Multiple phenotypically distinct smooth muscle cell populations exist in the adult and developing bovine pulmonary arterial media in vivo.

    M G Frid;E P Moiseeva;K R Stenmark

  • Hypoxia-induced pulmonary artery adventitial remodeling and neovascularization: contribution of progenitor cells.

    Neil J. Davie;Joseph T. Crossno;Maria G. Frid;Stephen E. Hofmeister

  • A consensus approach to the classification of pediatric pulmonary hypertensive vascular disease: Report from the PVRI Pediatric Taskforce, Panama 2011.

    Maria Jesus del Cerro;Steven Abman;Gabriel Diaz;Alexandra Heath Freudenthal

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas W. Morrell
Nicholas W. Morrell University of Cambridge
D. Dunbar Ivy
D. Dunbar Ivy University of Colorado Denver
Rubin M. Tuder
Rubin M. Tuder University of Colorado Denver
Robert P. Mecham
Robert P. Mecham Washington University in St. Louis
John T. Reeves
John T. Reeves University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Norbert F. Voelkel
Norbert F. Voelkel Virginia Commonwealth University
William C. Parks
William C. Parks Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Angelo D'Alessandro
Angelo D'Alessandro University of Colorado Denver
Marlene Rabinovitch
Marlene Rabinovitch Stanford University
Timothy A. McKinsey
Timothy A. McKinsey University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have access to a growing number of flexible, accredited online programs that support a variety of rewarding health careers. These programs are often more affordable and convenient than traditional options, enabling students to balance learning with work or personal commitments.

For those interested in mental health, psych nurse practitioner programs offer advanced training entirely online, preparing graduates to provide critical psychiatric care. Students looking for foundational roles in healthcare leadership can pursue a bachelors in healthcare administration—ideal for entering management or administrative positions.

Looking for further advancement? The cheapest online mha programs make it possible to earn a master’s in healthcare administration while minimizing costs. For nurses seeking the highest level of clinical practice, cheap dnp online programs deliver doctorate-level training with flexible study options.

These diverse online paths open new doors for students eager to join or advance within the medical field, offering both practical skills and opportunities for specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Kurt R. Stenmark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles