World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
26973
World Ranking
13678
National Ranking
6946

John T. Reeves publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Reeves sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 338 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John T. Reeves D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Reeves sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John T. Reeves is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research activity primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a total of three publications contributing to these areas.

The subfields of Reeves's research include Genetics, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Animal Science and Zoology, and Immunology. These areas align closely with their main research topics, which cover virus-based gene therapy research, viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects, viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology, animal virus infections studies, and aspects of interferon and immune responses.

Reeves's recent published papers demonstrate this focus on viral biology and gene therapy. Selected publications include:

  • High-yield recombinant adeno-associated viral vector production by multivariate optimization of bioprocess and transfection conditions (2024) published in Biotechnology Progress
  • Development of cell-based assay for detecting replication-competent adeno-associated virus by qPCR (2025) published in Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • Contents (2022) published in Surgery

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Reeves's research profile. Frequent co-authors with whom they have worked include Aishwarya Shevade, Hanne Bak, Andrew D. Tustian, Louis Coplan, and Zhe Zhang. These collaborative relationships suggest ongoing engagement with researchers contributing to similar fields of study, particularly in virus-related molecular research.

Reeves's work appears in several distinguished publication venues relevant to their field. These include Biotechnology Progress, Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development, and Surgery. Each venue represents a specific aspect of their multidisciplinary focus, ranging from bioprocess optimization to clinical development and surgical research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Survival in Patients with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Results from a National Prospective Registry

    Gilbert E. D'Alonzo;Robyn J. Barst;Stephen M. Ayres;Edward H. Bergofsky

  • Consensus Statement on Chronic and Subacute High Altitude Diseases

    Fabiola León-Velarde;Marco Maggiorini;John T. Reeves;Almaz Aldashev

  • Operation Everest II: oxygen transport during exercise at extreme simulated altitude

    J. R. Sutton;J. T. Reeves;P. D. Wagner;B. M. Groves

  • Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling Requires Recruitment of Circulating Mesenchymal Precursors of a Monocyte/Macrophage Lineage

    Maria G. Frid;Jacqueline A. Brunetti;Danielle L. Burke;Todd C. Carpenter

  • Inhibition of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by calcium antagonists in isolated rat lungs.

    I F McMurtry;A B Davidson;J T Reeves;R F Grover

  • Prostacyclin-induced acute pulmonary vasodilation in primary pulmonary hypertension.

    L J Rubin;B M Groves;J T Reeves;M Frosolono

  • Operation Everest II: elevated high-altitude pulmonary resistance unresponsive to oxygen

    B. M. Groves;J. T. Reeves;J. R. Sutton;P. D. Wagner

  • Nonimmunological production of leukotrienes induced by platelet-activating factor

    NF Voelkel;S Worthen;JT Reeves;PM Henson

  • Increased dependence on blood glucose after acclimatization to 4,300 m.

    G. A. Brooks;G. E. Butterfield;R. R. Wolfe;B. M. Groves

  • Operation Everest II: preservation of cardiac function at extreme altitude

    J. T. Reeves;B. M. Groves;J. R. Sutton;P. D. Wagner

  • Measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance at rest and during exercise

    J. C. Denniston;J. T. Maher;J. T. Reeves;J. C. Cruz

  • Hypoxia-induced pulmonary artery adventitial remodeling and neovascularization: contribution of progenitor cells.

    Neil J. Davie;Joseph T. Crossno;Maria G. Frid;Stephen E. Hofmeister

  • Increased energy intake minimizes weight loss in men at high altitude.

    G. E. Butterfield;J. Gates;S. Fleming;G. A. Brooks

  • Operation Everest II: pulmonary gas exchange during a simulated ascent of Mt. Everest

    P. D. Wagner;J. R. Sutton;J. T. Reeves;A. Cymerman

  • Lung vascular smooth muscle as a determinant of pulmonary hypertension at high altitude

    A Tucker;IF McMurtry;JT Reeves;AF Alexander

  • Arterial catecholamine responses during exercise with acute and chronic high-altitude exposure.

    R. S. Mazzeo;P. R. Bender;G. A. Brooks;G. E. Butterfield

  • Severe pulmonary hypertension and arterial adventitial changes in newborn calves at 4,300 m.

    K. R. Stenmark;J. Fasules;D. M. Hyde;N. F. Voelkel

  • Congenital Pulmonary Lymphangiectasis

    Jacqueline A. Noonan;Linda R. Walters;John T. Reeves

  • Acclimatization to 4,300-m altitude decreases reliance on fat as a substrate

    A. C. Roberts;G. E. Butterfield;A. Cymerman;J. T. Reeves

  • Distensibility of the normal human lung circulation during exercise

    John T. Reeves;John H. Linehan;Kurt R. Stenmark

Frequent Co-Authors

Ivan F. McMurtry
Ivan F. McMurtry University of South Alabama
Norbert F. Voelkel
Norbert F. Voelkel Virginia Commonwealth University
Lorna G. Moore
Lorna G. Moore University of Colorado Denver
George A. Brooks
George A. Brooks University of California, Berkeley
Kurt R. Stenmark
Kurt R. Stenmark University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Frank C. Spencer
Frank C. Spencer New York University
Peter D. Wagner
Peter D. Wagner University of California, San Diego
Robert C. Murphy
Robert C. Murphy University of Colorado Denver
Stephen L. Archer
Stephen L. Archer Queen's University
Robert P. Mecham
Robert P. Mecham Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA opens the door to a variety of educational options and professional pathways—even beyond traditional MD and DO programs. Many students are now exploring online alternatives to help fast-track their careers or specialize in high-demand fields.

For those interested in mental health, the fastest pmhnp program options let registered nurses become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners more quickly, meeting urgent needs in mental health services. If healthcare leadership interests you, a health care administration degree online can offer comprehensive training in management, policy, and leadership, often in a flexible format for working adults.

Looking for affordability? The most affordable online mha programs are designed to minimize cost while maximizing your potential as a healthcare administrator. For nurses seeking the pinnacle of clinical education, the best online bsn to dnp programs provide an accessible path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, focusing on leadership and advanced practice skills.

These alternative online degrees present diverse, accessible, and often affordable opportunities to grow your healthcare career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing John T. Reeves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles