World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
17529
World Ranking
18915
National Ranking
9424

Frank C. Spencer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank C. Spencer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 324 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank C. Spencer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank C. Spencer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank C. Spencer was affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their academic career involved contributions to scientific research, although no recent papers or records of specific publications are currently listed.

Throughout their career, Spencer did not have records of frequent co-authors or repeated collaborations documented. Similarly, there is no available information about venues where they consistently published their work or specific book publications attributed to them.

Data on Spencer's main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics is not documented. Likewise, there is no record of awards or recognitions received during their career.

The available information indicates that Spencer has passed away, and the profile reflects their work in past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

    Edward S. Katz;Paul A. Tunick;Henry Rusinek;Greg Ribakove

  • Sternal and costochondral infections following open-heart surgery. A review of 2,594 cases.

    A.T. Culliford;J.N. Cunningham;R.H. Zeff;O.W. Isom

  • A Survey of 77 Major Infectious Complications of Median Sternotomy: A Review of 7,949 Consecutive Operative Procedures

    Eugene A. Grossi;Alfred T. Culliford;Karl H. Krieger;David Kloth

  • Sternal wound infections and use of internal mammary artery grafts.

    Eugene A. Grossi;R. Esposito;L.J. Harris;G.A. Crooke

  • Improved results from a standardized approach in treating patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

    Laura A. Sudarsky;John C. Laschinger;Gene F. Coppa;Frank C. Spencer

  • Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management.

    H L Pachter;A A Guth;S R Hofstetter;F C Spencer

  • The incidence and natural history of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery--an echocardiographic study.

    L B Weitzman;W P Tinker;I Kronzon;M L Cohen

  • Significant trends in the treatment of hepatic trauma. Experience with 411 injuries.

    H. Pachter;Frank Spencer;Steven Hofstetter;Howard Liang

  • A comparison of mitral valve reconstruction with mitral valve replacement: Intermediate-term results

    A.C. Galloway;S.B. Colvin;F.G. Baumann;E.A. Grossi

  • Measurement of spinal cord ischemia during operations upon the thoracic aorta: initial clinical experience.

    Joseph N. Cunningham;John C. Laschinger;Henry A. Merkin;Ira M. Nathan

  • Surgical implications of transesophageal echocardiography to grade the atheromatous aortic arch

    Greg H. Ribakove;Edward S. Katz;Aubrey C. Galloway;Eugene A. Grossi

  • Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in persons aged 80 years and over

    Alfred T. Culliford;Aubrey C. Galloway;Stephen B. Colvin;Eugene A. Grossi

  • The effects of different techniques of internal mammary artery harvesting on sternal blood flow.

    Michael A. Parish;Tohru Asai;Eugene A. Grossi;Rick Esposito

  • Experience with the finger fracture technique to achieve intra-hepatic hemostasis in 75 patients with severe injuries of the liver.

    H. Pachter;Frank Spencer;Steven Hofstetter;Gene Coppa

  • Heparin bonding of bypass circuits reduces cytokine release during cardiopulmonary bypass.

    Bryan M. Steinberg;Eugene A. Grossi;Daniel S. Schwartz;David E. McLoughlin

  • Transthoracic removal of thoracic disc. Report of three cases.

    Joseph Ransohoff;Frank Spencer;Fred Siew;Lyle Gage

  • Coronary artery bypass grafts for congestive heart failure. A report of experiences with 40 patients.

    Frank C. Spencer;Frank C. Spencer;George E. Green;George E. Green;David A. Tice;David A. Tice;Eugene Wallsh;Eugene Wallsh

  • Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta: IV. Clinical observations and results

    Joseph N. Cunningham;Joseph N. Cunningham;John C. Laschinger;John C. Laschinger;Frank C. Spencer;Frank C. Spencer

  • Experimental and clinical assessment of the adequacy of partial bypass in maintenance of spinal cord blood flow during operations on the thoracic aorta.

    John C. Laschinger;Joseph N. Cunningham;Ira M. Nathan;Edmond A. Knopp

  • Prevention of Ischemic Spinal Cord Injury Following Aortic Cross-Clamping: Use of Corticosteroids

    John C. Laschinger;Joseph N. Cunningham;Matthew M. Cooper;Karl Krieger

Frequent Co-Authors

Itzhak Kronzon
Itzhak Kronzon Lenox Hill Hospital
John T. Reeves
John T. Reeves University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Hermes C. Grillo
Hermes C. Grillo Harvard University
John W. Kirklin
John W. Kirklin University of Alabama at Birmingham
Alan L. Mendelsohn
Alan L. Mendelsohn New York University
Michael E. DeBakey
Michael E. DeBakey Baylor College of Medicine
Jay L. Grosfeld
Jay L. Grosfeld Indiana University
Joseph G. McCarthy
Joseph G. McCarthy New York University
Henry Rusinek
Henry Rusinek New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of online degrees and alternate pathways. For those interested in healthcare without direct patient care, accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid offer flexible options to enter the medical field with strong job prospects.

If your goal is to pursue nursing, there are now absn programs that don't require teas testing, helping you fast-track your career as a Registered Nurse without standardized exam barriers.

For those interested in leadership or administrative roles, you can advance quickly through healthcare administration programs online, which prepare you for healthcare management and executive positions.

Nurses looking to take on more responsibility can check out flexible adn to np bridge programs, allowing Associate Degree Nurses to become Nurse Practitioners in less time.

Each of these degree paths enables students to enter or advance in healthcare, often with less traditional requirements and enhanced support options.

Best Scientists Citing Frank C. Spencer

Recently Published Articles