World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
33574
World Ranking
10843
National Ranking
5580

Floyd D. Loop publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Floyd D. Loop sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Floyd D. Loop D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Floyd D. Loop sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Floyd D. Loop was affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States during their career.

No records of recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications are available for this scientist in the data provided.

Similarly, there is no detailed information on the main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work attributed to Floyd D. Loop in the available source data.

The data includes no awards information for Floyd D. Loop.

The scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events.

    F D Loop;B W Lytle;D M Cosgrove;R W Stewart

  • GUIDELINES FOR PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY

    T J Ryan;D P Faxon;R M Gunnar

  • Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts.

    Lytle Bw;Loop Fd;Cosgrove Dm;Ratliff Nb

  • Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.

    Bruce W. Lytle;Eugene H. Blackstone;Floyd D. Loop;Penny L. Houghtaling

  • Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score.

    Thomas L. Higgins;Fawzy G. Estafanous;Floyd D. Loop;Gerald J. Beck

  • Morbidity and mortality risk associated with red blood cell and blood-component transfusion in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Colleen Gorman Koch;Liang Li;Andra I. Duncan;Tomislav Mihaljevic

  • Sternal wound complications after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: Early and late mortality, morbidity, and cost of care

    Floyd D. Loop;Bruce W. Lytle;Delos M. Cosgrove;Saade Mahfood

  • Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease

    A.Marc Gillinov;Delos M. Cosgrove;Eugene H. Blackstone;Ramon Diaz

  • The Effect of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting on Survival During 20 Postoperative Years

    Bruce W. Lytle;Eugene H. Blackstone;Joseph F. Sabik;Penny Houghtaling

  • Atheroembolism from the ascending aorta. An emerging problem in cardiac surgery.

    Christopher I. Blauth;Delos M. Cosgrove;Brian W. Webb;Norman B. Ratliff

  • Transfusion in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Associated with Reduced Long-Term Survival

    Colleen Gorman Koch;Liang Li;Andra I. Duncan;Tomislav Mihaljevic

  • Role of prophylactic anticoagulation for direct current cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

    Anita Zeiler Arnold;Matthew J. Mick;Robert P. Mazurek;Floyd D. Loop

  • Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: A placebo-controlled study

    Delos Cosgrove;B. Heric;B. W. Lytle;P. C. Taylor

  • Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: analyses of risks and long-term results.

    Floyd D Loop;Leonard R. Golding;Julie P. Macmillan;Delos M. Cosgrove

  • Central nervous system complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective analysis of 421 patients.

    A. C. Breuer;Anthony J. Furlan;M. R. Hanson;R. J. Lederman

  • Fifteen hundred coronary reoperations. Results and determinants of early and late survival.

    Bruce W. Lytle;Floyd D. Loop;Delos M. Cosgrove;Paul C. Taylor

  • Primary Myocardial Revascularization Trends in Surgical Mortality

    D. M. Cosgrove;F. D. Loop;B. W. Lytle;R. Baillot

  • Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base.

    E. J. Topol;S. G. Ellis;D. M. Cosgrove;E. R. Bates

  • Outmigration For Coronary Bypass Surgery in an Era of Public Dissemination of Clinical Outcomes

    Nowamagbe A. Omoigui;Dave P. Miller;Kimberly J. Brown;Kingsley Annan

  • Surgical staging for simultaneous coronary and carotid disease: a study including prospective randomization.

    Norman R. Hertzer;Floyd D. Loop;Edwin G. Beven;Patrick J. O'Hara

Frequent Co-Authors

Delos M. Cosgrove
Delos M. Cosgrove Cleveland Clinic
Bruce W. Lytle
Bruce W. Lytle Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital
Marlene Goormastic
Marlene Goormastic Cleveland Clinic
Patrick M. McCarthy
Patrick M. McCarthy Northwestern University
Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic
William J. Stewart
William J. Stewart Cleveland Clinic
Anthony J. Furlan
Anthony J. Furlan Case Western Reserve University
Stephen G. Ellis
Stephen G. Ellis Cleveland Clinic
Joseph F. Sabik
Joseph F. Sabik University Hospitals of Cleveland
Nicholas G. Smedira
Nicholas G. Smedira Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring your options in Medicine beyond traditional MD programs, there are multiple online degrees and career pathways worth considering. For those interested in healthcare management, pursuing an online healthcare administration degree can open doors to leadership roles in medical facilities, insurance companies, and public health organizations.

Advancement in healthcare administration often requires further credentials. Costs for a master's program vary, so researching the masters in healthcare administration cost is an important step for budget-conscious students. Meanwhile, nurses looking to achieve a clinical leadership role can consider the cheapest dnp programs available, which provide a pathway to the highest level of nursing practice.

Pharmacy is another sought-after allied health field. Completing pharmacy school online is becoming more accessible, so reviewing top options for pharmacy school online may help you find a flexible and affordable route to a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Floyd D. Loop

Recently Published Articles