World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William J. Stewart

William J. Stewart

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
53973
World Ranking
16362
National Ranking
8230

William J. Stewart publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Stewart sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 263 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Stewart D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Stewart sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1966 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

William J. Stewart is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their research spans the fields of engineering and medicine, with a focus on both technical and medical subfields.

The primary areas of study include mechanical engineering, automotive engineering, civil and structural engineering, neurology, and epidemiology. The main topics covered in their work consist of refrigeration and air conditioning technologies, vehicle emissions and performance, engineering applied research, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research, traumatic brain injury research, and spinal cord injury research.

Recent publications by Stewart include the following papers:

  • BioNetGMMFit: a Parameter Estimation Tool for BioNetGen using Single-Cell Snapshot Data from Cell Populations Evolving over Time (2022), published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Performance Test of a 9 MW-Class Three-Stage Axial CO2 Compressor (2025), published in the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (2025), published in JAMA Network Open

Among frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Stewart are John Wu, C. Jayaprakash, Jayajit Das, Jeong-Seek Kang, and Alexander Vorobiev.

Stewart has published in a variety of venues, including Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, and JAMA Network Open.

In recognition of their contributions, William J. Stewart was awarded Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1966.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B. Devereux;Frank A. Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B Devereux;Frank A Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography

    William A Zoghbi;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;Elyse Foster;Paul A Grayburn

  • Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Theodore Abraham;Mark S. Adams;Charles J. Bruce

  • ASE/SCA Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Intraoperative Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography Examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography

    Jack S. Shanewise;Albert T. Cheung;Solomon Aronson;William J. Stewart

  • Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography

    Daniel M. Thys;Martin D. Abel;Robert F. Brooker;Michael K. Cahalan

  • American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

    W. A. Zoghbi;M. Enriquez-Sarano;E. Foster;P. A. Grayburn

  • Accuracy and limitations of exercise echocardiography in a routine clinical setting

    Thomas H. Marwick;James J. Nemec;Fredric J. Pashkow;William J. Stewart

  • Geometric Differences of the Mitral Apparatus Between Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Significant Mitral Regurgitation Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Study

    Jun Kwan;Takahiro Shiota;Deborah A. Agler;Zoran B. Popović

  • Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics of Papillary Fibroelastomas A Retrospective and Prospective Study in 162 Patients

    Jing Ping Sun;Craig R. Asher;Xing Sheng Yang;Georgiana G. Cheng

  • Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.

    Philippe Pibarot;Neil J. Weissman;William J. Stewart;Rebecca T. Hahn

  • Impact of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation on left atrial appendage function and spontaneous echo contrast: characterization by simultaneous transesophageal echocardiography.

    Richard A. Grimm;William J. Stewart;James D. Maloney;Gerald I. Cohen

  • Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes

    Susheel Kodali;Philippe Pibarot;Pamela S. Douglas;Mathew Williams

  • Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Therapy in Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial Analysis

    Howard C. Herrmann;Philippe Pibarot;Irene Hueter;Zachary M. Gertz

  • Sexual Activity and Cardiovascular Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Glenn N. Levine;Elaine E. Steinke;Faisal G. Bakaeen;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction

    Jeremy J. Pereira;Michael S. Lauer;Mohammad Bashir;Imran Afridi

  • Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    William A. Zoghbi;Federico M. Asch;Charles Bruce;Linda D. Gillam

  • Myocardial wall velocity assessment by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging: characteristic findings in normal subjects.

    Mario J. Garcia;Mario J. Garcia;Leonardo Rodriguez;Miguel Ares;Brian P. Griffin

  • Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease--implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review.

    Sachin S. Goel;Mobolaji Ige;E. Murat Tuzcu;Stephen G. Ellis

  • Prevalence and outcomes of unoperated patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation and heart failure: comprehensive analysis to determine the potential role of MitraClip for this unmet need

    Sachin S. Goel;Navkaranbir Bajaj;Bhuvnesh Aggarwal;Supriya Gupta

Frequent Co-Authors

James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Allan L. Klein
Allan L. Klein Cleveland Clinic
Delos M. Cosgrove
Delos M. Cosgrove Cleveland Clinic
Brian P. Griffin
Brian P. Griffin Cleveland Clinic
Samir R. Kapadia
Samir R. Kapadia Cleveland Clinic
Lars G. Svensson
Lars G. Svensson Cleveland Clinic
E. Murat Tuzcu
E. Murat Tuzcu Cleveland Clinic
Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Bruce W. Lytle
Bruce W. Lytle Baylor Scott & White The Heart Hospital
Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine but seeking flexible learning options, online healthcare degrees offer strong career alternatives. Many choose online nursing school to begin their journey in patient care, taking advantage of programs that combine virtual classes with hands-on clinical experience.

Advanced practitioners and those interested in leadership roles can benefit from online nursing doctoral programs, which focus on research, education, and policy-making. These programs are ideal for nurses seeking to make a broader impact beyond direct patient care.

Cost is an important factor when considering online nursing education. The average cost of rn to bsn programs can vary widely, so it’s essential to compare tuition and financial aid options when exploring RN to BSN pathways.

Finally, non-nurses looking to pursue advanced roles without a prior nursing degree can consider entry level msn programs online. These accelerated options allow students from diverse undergraduate backgrounds to earn a master’s in nursing and enter the field quickly.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Stewart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles