World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
23502
World Ranking
14270
National Ranking
7212

Jay L. Grosfeld publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay L. Grosfeld sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 468 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jay L. Grosfeld D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay L. Grosfeld sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay L. Grosfeld was affiliated with Indiana University in the United States during their career. Their professional work was situated primarily within this academic context.

There is no available data concerning their recent publications, frequent co-authors, or the venues where their research was typically published. Similarly, no information about books they may have published is present in the available data.

Details regarding their main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics are also not documented in the data provided. Furthermore, there is no record of awards or honors received during their career.

Jay L. Grosfeld was deceased at the time of this summary.

Best Publications

  • Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations.

    Alexander Holschneider;John Hutson;Albert Peña;Elhamy Beket

  • Intestinal Atresia and Stenosis: A 25-Year Experience With 277 Cases

    Laura K. Dalla Vecchia;Jay L. Grosfeld;Jay L. Grosfeld;Karen W. West;Frederick J. Rescorla

  • Analysis of morbidity and mortality in 227 cases of esophageal atresia and/or tracheoesophageal fistula over two decades.

    Scott A. Engum;Jay L. Grosfeld;Karen W. West;Frederick J. Rescorla

  • Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children: A Combined Hospital Study of 7467 Patients

    Eric W. Fonkalsrud;Keith W. Ashcraft;Arnold G. Coran;Dick G. Ellis

  • Gastroschisis: a plea for risk categorization

    K.A. Molik;C.A. Gingalewski;K.W. West;F.J. Rescorla

  • Pectus excavatum repair: experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques.

    Kim A. Molik;Scott A. Engum;Frederick J. Rescorla;Karen W. West

  • Intra-Abdominal Complications Following Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Procedures

    Jay L. Grosfeld;Donald R. Cooney;John Smith;Robert L. Campbell

  • Duodenal atresia and stenosis: long-term follow-up over 30 years

    Mauricio A. Escobar;Alan P. Ladd;Jay L. Grosfeld;Karen W. West

  • Benign and malignant teratomas in children: analysis of 85 patients.

    Grosfeld Jl;Ballantine Tv;Lowe D;Baehner Rl

  • Hirschsprung's Disease: Evaluation of Mortality and Long-term Function in 260 Cases

    Frederick J. Rescorla;Albert M. Morrison;Drew Engles;Karen W. West

  • Teratomas in childhood: analysis of 142 cases

    Deborah F. Billmire;Jay L. Grosfeld

  • Operative management of intestinal atresia and stenosis based on pathologic findings

    Jay L. Grosfeld;Thomas V.N. Ballantine;Robert Shoemaker

  • Long-term analysis of children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.

    D.C Little;F.J Rescorla;J.L Grosfeld;K.W West

  • High intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of experimental liver cancer

    Rong Yang;Clarence R. Reilly;Frederick J. Rescorla;Philip R. Faught

  • Vitelline Duct Anomalies: Experience With 217 Childhood Cases

    Dennis W. Vane;Karen W. West;Jay L. Grosfeld

  • Duodenal atresia and stenosis: Reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathologic variance, and long-term follow-up

    Jay L. Grosfeld;Frederick J. Rescorla;Frederick J. Rescorla

  • Controversies concerning diagnostic guidelines for anomalies of the enteric nervous system: a report from the fourth International Symposium on Hirschsprung's disease and related neurocristopathies.

    Giuseppe Martucciello;Alessio Pini Prato;Prem Puri;Alexander M. Holschneider

  • Increased Risk of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Infants with Patent Ductus Arteriosus Treated with Indomethacin

    Jay L. Grosfeld;Mark Chaet;Francine Molinari;William Engle

  • Inflammatory pseudotumor of the alimentary tract: Clinical and surgical experience

    Bridget M. Sanders;Karen W. West;Cindy Gingalewski;Scott Engum

  • Complications after surgical intervention for necrotizing enterocolitis: A multicenter review

    Jeffrey R Horwitz;Kevin P Lally;Henry W Cheu;W David Vazquez

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick J. Rescorla
Frederick J. Rescorla Indiana University
John L. Cameron
John L. Cameron Johns Hopkins University
Charles M. Balch
Charles M. Balch The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Andrew L. Warshaw
Andrew L. Warshaw Harvard University
Alfred Cuschieri
Alfred Cuschieri University of Dundee
John P. Neoptolemos
John P. Neoptolemos Heidelberg University
Michael G. Sarr
Michael G. Sarr Mayo Clinic
Basil A. Pruitt
Basil A. Pruitt The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Walter J. Pories
Walter J. Pories East Carolina University
Arnold G. Coran
Arnold G. Coran University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn’t always require a traditional path through medical school. Today, many students consider what is the cheapest online college for nursing? as an affordable and flexible way to start a healthcare career. Online nursing degrees make it possible for students to study at their own pace and control their educational costs.

For those already in the nursing field, advancing professionally is easier with affordable options like rn to bsn online cost programs, which help registered nurses earn a bachelor’s degree efficiently. If your ambitions include roles in research, teaching, or leadership, online nursing doctoral programs offer in-depth specialization while keeping expenses in check.

Even if you don’t have a previous nursing background, there are fast-track education options. Programs such as online msn programs for non nurses allow individuals from other disciplines to enter nursing at an advanced level, broadening career opportunities in the medical field.

These pathways provide several routes into healthcare, making it accessible for students with various backgrounds and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Jay L. Grosfeld

Recently Published Articles