World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
16672
World Ranking
19223
National Ranking
9577

Daniel H. Teitelbaum publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. Teitelbaum sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 380 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel H. Teitelbaum D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. Teitelbaum sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel H. Teitelbaum was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spanned multiple areas within medicine, with a strong focus on public health, cancer research, physiology, and clinical biochemistry.

The main fields of study in their work included Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Subfields addressed in their publications covered Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cancer Research, Physiology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, and Clinical Biochemistry.

The scientist contributed extensively to topics such as Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare, Antibiotic Use and Resistance, Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing, Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy, Cancer-related Molecular Mechanisms Research, RNA Modifications and Cancer, and the role of MicroRNA in Disease Regulation.

Frequent coauthors in their collaborations included Lauren Wintraub, Mary Xie, Mariam Issa, Matthew W. Nelms, and Mirek Otremba, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

The venues that often published their work were diverse, with several contributions to the Canadian Medical Education Journal, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood Neoplasia, and Blood.

Among their recent papers were the following:

  • Introducing the Escalation Antibiogram: A Simple Tool to Inform Changes in Empiric Antimicrobials in the Nonresponding Patient, 2022, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Long noncoding RNA GATA2-AS1 augments endothelial hypoxia inducible factor 1-α induction and regulates hypoxic signaling, 2023, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Wearable technology and live video conferencing: The development of an affordable virtual teaching platform to enhance clinical skills education during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Canadian Medical Education Journal
  • Use of wearable point-of-view live streaming technology for virtual physical exam skills training, 2022, Canadian Medical Education Journal
  • Race and age disparities in randomized trials of acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2025, Blood Neoplasia

Best Publications

  • Colostomy: formation and closure

    Daniel H. Teitelbaum;Arnold G. Coran

  • Natural history of pediatric intestinal failure: initial report from the Pediatric Intestinal Failure Consortium.

    Robert H. Squires;Christopher Duggan;Daniel H. Teitelbaum;Paul W. Wales

  • Pediatric short bowel syndrome: redefining predictors of success.

    Ariel U. Spencer;Andreea Neaga;Brady West;Jared Safran

  • Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model.

    A. F. Mattar;Daniel H. Teitelbaum;R. A. Drongowski;F. Yongyi

  • One-stage transanal Soave pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: a multicenter experience with 141 children.

    Jacob C. Langer;Audrey C. Durrant;Luis de la Torre;Daniel H. Teitelbaum

  • Delayed Versus Immediate Surgery In Acute Appendicitis: Do We Need to Operate During the Night?

    Dani Yardeni;Ronald B Hirschl;Robert A Drongowski;Daniel H Teitelbaum

  • Transcriptome-wide Analysis Reveals Hallmarks of Human Intestine Development and Maturation In Vitro and In Vivo

    Stacy R. Finkbeiner;David R. Hill;Christopher H. Altheim;Priya H. Dedhia

  • Early experience with minimally invasive repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias: results and lessons learned.

    Marjorie J Arca;Douglas C Barnhart;Joseph L Lelli;Jonathon Greenfeld

  • A decade of experience with the primary pull-through for hirschsprung disease in the newborn period: a multicenter analysis of outcomes.

    Daniel H. Teitelbaum;Robert E. Cilley;Neil J. Sherman;David Bliss

  • Pediatric short-bowel syndrome: the cost of comprehensive care

    Ariel U Spencer;Debra Kovacevich;Michelle McKinney-Barnett;Deanna Hair

  • Enterocolitis associated with Hirschsprung's disease: a clinical-radiological characterization based on 168 patients.

    Essam A Elhalaby;Arnold G Coran;Arnold G Coran;Caroline E Blane;Caroline E Blane;Ronald B Hirschl;Ronald B Hirschl

  • Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation and its postnatal presentation, surgical indications, and natural history

    Kathleen van Leeuwen;Daniel H. Teitelbaum;Ronald B. Hirschl;Edward Austin

  • Development of a standardized definition for Hirschsprung's-associated enterocolitis : a Delphi analysis

    Aimee C. Pastor;Fahima Osman;Daniel H. Teitelbaum;Michael G. Caty

  • A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines: Support of Pediatric Patients With Intestinal Failure at Risk of Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver Disease

    Paul W. Wales;Nancy Allen;Patricia Worthington;Donald George

  • Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocyte γδ-T Cell-Derived Keratinocyte Growth Factor Modulates Epithelial Growth in the Mouse

    Hua Yang;Paul A. Antony;Barbara E. Wildhaber;Daniel H. Teitelbaum

  • Predictors of Enteral Autonomy in Children with Intestinal Failure: A Multicenter Cohort Study

    Faraz A. Khan;Robert H. Squires;Heather J. Litman;Jane Balint

  • Intravenous fat emulsions reduction for patients with parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease

    Mary Petrea Cober;Ghassan Killu;Allison Brattain;Kathleen B. Welch

  • Outcomes from a 12-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Teduglutide in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome

    Beth A. Carter;Valeria C. Cohran;Conrad R. Cole;Mark R. Corkins

  • Lack of enteral nutrition—effects on the intestinal immune system

    Barbara E. Wildhaber;Hua Yang;Ariel U. Spencer;Robert A. Drongowski

  • Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis: pathogenesis, treatment and prevention.

    Farokh R. Demehri;Ihab F. Halaweish;Arnold G. Coran;Daniel H. Teitelbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Arnold G. Coran
Arnold G. Coran University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ronald B. Hirschl
Ronald B. Hirschl University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter J. Dempsey
Peter J. Dempsey University of Colorado Denver
Christopher Duggan
Christopher Duggan Boston Children's Hospital
Scott D. Larsen
Scott D. Larsen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jens J. Holst
Jens J. Holst University of Copenhagen
Brady T. West
Brady T. West University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert M. Merion
Robert M. Merion University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gary B. Huffnagle
Gary B. Huffnagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jason R. Spence
Jason R. Spence University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare. For those seeking practical, patient-facing roles, there are nursing programs with high acceptance rates that make entry into nursing more accessible. Some schools even offer nursing schools that don't require teas test, removing a common barrier for prospective nurses.

If you're interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider healthcare administration degrees. These programs can often be completed online and prepare graduates for management and leadership roles in various health settings.

For those seeking in-demand support roles, look into medical billing and coding schools with financial aid. This pathway offers strong job prospects and the flexibility of remote work, making it a popular choice for many.

Exploring these online options can help you begin your journey in healthcare, no matter your background or current level of education.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel H. Teitelbaum

Recently Published Articles