World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giorgia Silani

Giorgia Silani

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9390 8776 44 42 102 7723

Giorgia Silani publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giorgia Silani between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giorgia Silani published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 24 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 10 publications
1999 2025

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giorgia Silani: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 3
2007 0
2008 3
2009 0
2010 2
2011 1
2012 0
2013 4
2014 7
2015 4
2016 3
2017 5
2018 7
2019 6
2020 9
2021 17
2022 13
2023 12
2024 14
2025 10
Total 124
Download as CSV

Giorgia Silani publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giorgia Silani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 102
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Giorgia Silani D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giorgia Silani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Giorgia Silani is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria and focuses on research within the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research extensively covers topics such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, autism spectrum disorder research, olfactory and sensory function studies, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, COVID-19 and mental health, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and pain mechanisms and treatments.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Giorgia Silani include:

  • Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures, 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Dopaminergic and opioidergic regulation during anticipation and consumption of social and nonsocial rewards, 2020, eLife
  • When differences matter: rTMS/fMRI reveals how differences in dispositional empathy translate to distinct neural underpinnings of self-other distinction in empathy, 2020, Cortex
  • Defining key concepts for mental state attribution, 2024, Communications Psychology
  • Beyond Sharing Unpleasant Affect-Evidence for Pain-Specific Opioidergic Modulation of Empathy for Pain, 2020, Cerebral Cortex

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Silani include Claus Lamm, Claudia Massaccesi, Urs M. Nater, Sebastian Korb, and Matthäus Willeit. The scientist has published multiple works in key venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Psychiatry, eLife, Cerebral Cortex, and Frontiers in Psychology.

The distribution of work across publication venues demonstrates consistent engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed platforms in the neuroscience and psychology domains.

Best Publications

  • Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members' suffering predict individual differences in costly helping

    Grit Hein;Giorgia Silani;Kerstin Preuschoff;C. Daniel Batson

  • Empathic brain responses in insula are modulated by levels of alexithymia but not autism

    Geoffrey Bird;Giorgia Silani;Rachel Brindley;Sarah White

  • Levels of emotional awareness and autism: An fMRI study

    Giorgia Silani;Geoffrey Bird;Rachel Brindley;Tania Singer

  • Right supramarginal gyrus is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments.

    Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Claus Lamm;Claus Lamm;Christian C. Ruff;Tania Singer;Tania Singer

  • Brain abnormalities underlying altered activation in dyslexia: a voxel based morphometry study.

    G. Silani;U. Frith;J.-F. Demonet;F. Fazio

  • Effects of Oxytocin and Prosocial Behavior on Brain Responses to Direct and Vicariously Experienced Pain

    Tania Singer;Romana Snozzi;Geoffrey Bird;Predrag Petrovic

  • From shared to distinct self–other representations in empathy: evidence from neurotypical function and socio-cognitive disorders

    C. Lamm;H. Bukowski;G. Silani

  • Is stress affecting our ability to tune into others? Evidence for gender differences in the effects of stress on self-other distinction

    L. Tomova;B. von Dawans;M. Heinrichs;G. Silani

  • Attention does not modulate neural responses to social stimuli in autism spectrum disorders.

    Geoffrey Bird;Caroline Catmur;Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Christopher D. Frith

  • Placebo analgesia and its opioidergic regulation suggest that empathy for pain is grounded in self pain

    Markus Rütgen;Eva-Maria Seidel;Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Igor Riečanský;Igor Riečanský

  • Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas.

    Indrajeet Patil;Carlotta Cogoni;Nicola Zangrando;Luca Chittaro

  • Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia

    Indrajeet Patil;Giorgia Silani

  • Are we really measuring empathy? Proposal for a new measurement framework.

    Michel-Pierre Coll;Michel-Pierre Coll;Essi Viding;Markus Rütgen;Giorgia Silani

  • A functional-anatomical model for lipreading.

    E. Paulesu;D. Perani;V. Blasi;G. Silani

  • Selective Disruption of Sociocognitive Structural Brain Networks in Autism and Alexithymia

    Boris C. Bernhardt;Sofie L. Valk;Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Geoffrey Bird;Geoffrey Bird

  • Distinct neural networks underlying empathy for pleasant and unpleasant touch

    Claus Lamm;Claus Lamm;Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Giorgia Silani;Tania Singer;Tania Singer

  • Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.

    Indrajeet Patil;Micaela Maria Zucchelli;Wouter Kool;Stephanie Campbell

  • Empathy for social exclusion involves the sensory-discriminative component of pain: a within-subject fMRI study

    Giovanni Novembre;Marco Zanon;Giorgia Silani

  • The impact of social exclusion vs. inclusion on subjective and hormonal reactions in females and males

    E.M. Seidel;G. Silani;H. Metzler;H. Thaler

  • Divergent roles of autistic and alexithymic traits in utilitarian moral judgments in adults with autism

    Indrajeet Patil;Jens Melsbach;Kristina Hennig-Fast;Giorgia Silani

Frequent Co-Authors

Claus Lamm
Claus Lamm University of Vienna
Tania Singer
Tania Singer Max Planck Society
Urs M. Nater
Urs M. Nater University of Vienna
Geoffrey Bird
Geoffrey Bird University of Oxford
Eraldo Paulesu
Eraldo Paulesu University of Milano-Bicocca
Uta Frith
Uta Frith University College London
Christian Windischberger
Christian Windischberger Medical University of Vienna
Boris B. Quednow
Boris B. Quednow University of Zurich
Luca Chittaro
Luca Chittaro University of Udine
Predrag Petrovic
Predrag Petrovic Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to various rewarding career pathways, including opportunities in social work. Online degrees are especially popular for those seeking flexible learning options while aiming for professional licensure.

It’s important to know that New Mexico minimum degree requirement for social workers is a bachelor’s degree in social work or a related field. In contrast, the New York education requirements for social workers are stricter, typically requiring a Master of Social Work (MSW) for higher levels of licensure. Similarly, understanding social worker education requirements in North Carolina can help you plan your academic path, as a bachelor’s or master’s degree may be needed based on your chosen role.

If you’re considering practice across multiple states, always review regional requirements. For example, you can check the North Dakota education requirements for social workers to understand what’s needed locally.

Online programs in psychology or social work provide flexibility, but make sure your chosen program meets the specific licensure criteria in your state.

Best Scientists Citing Giorgia Silani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles