World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8574 7923 636 588 123 5615

Jonathan Cole publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Cole between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Cole published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 6 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Cole: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 4
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 5
2001 0
2002 7
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 9
2007 12
2008 7
2009 3
2010 4
2011 8
2012 6
2013 5
2014 13
2015 3
2016 7
2017 3
2018 4
2019 4
2020 1
2021 5
2022 2
2023 4
2024 5
2025 1
Total 145
Download as CSV

Jonathan Cole publications per year - data summary

  • Jonathan Cole, a Neuroscience scholar from Bournemouth University, has 145 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990, 1994, 1999, 2020 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 36 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991, 1992 and 2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.4 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 17 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2001: 24 publications (2.0 per year); 2002-2013: 69 publications (5.8 per year); 2014-2025: 52 publications (4.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jonathan Cole publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Cole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 123 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 123
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Cole publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Jonathan Cole, a Neuroscience scholar from Bournemouth University, records 123 publications - the 29th percentile of the discipline.
  • 29% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Jonathan Cole, and about 71% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Jonathan Cole ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Jonathan Cole D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Cole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Cole D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Jonathan Cole, a Neuroscience scholar from Bournemouth University, records 38 D-Index - the 12th percentile of the discipline.
  • 12% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Jonathan Cole, and about 88% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Jonathan Cole ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Jonathan Cole is affiliated with Bournemouth University in the United Kingdom and specializes in neuroscience and medicine. Their research predominantly intersects cognitive neuroscience, physiology, social psychology, neurology, and molecular biology.

The primary topics explored in their work include:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Jonathan Cole has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications. Recent papers include:

  • One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research (2024), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Innocuous pressure sensation requires A-type afferents but not functional ΡΙΕΖΟ2 channels in humans (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss (2021), published in Experimental Brain Research
  • Perception of body shape and size without touch or proprioception: evidence from individuals with congenital and acquired neuropathy (2021), published in Experimental Brain Research
  • The role of clinical neurophysiology in the definition and assessment of fatigue and fatigability (2023), published in Clinical Neurophysiology Practice

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Håkan Olausson
  • Marcin Szczot
  • Saad S. Nagi
  • R. Chris Miall
  • Richard B. Ivry

Jonathan Cole's work has appeared regularly in several academic venues with multiple contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Experimental Brain Research
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Nature Communications

The research profile reflects a consistent engagement with understanding brain function, sensory processing, and motor control mechanisms through interdisciplinary approaches that combine neuroscience and medicine.

Best Publications

  • Whole-body mapping of spatial acuity for pain and touch.

    Flavia Mancini;Armando Bauleo;Armando Bauleo;Jonathan Cole;Fausta Lui

  • Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject

    Shaun Gallagher;Jonathan Cole

  • Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia.

    Jonathan Cole;Simon Crowle;Greg Austwick;David Henderson Slater

  • The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task.

    H.A. Ingram;P. van Donkelaar;J. Cole;J.-L. Vercher

  • Functional role of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin: sympathetic response and perceptual localization

    Håkan Olausson;Jonathan Cole;Karin Rylander;Francis McGlone

  • Vestibular‐evoked postural responses in the absence of somatosensory information

    Brian L. Day;Jonathan Cole

  • Unmyelinated tactile afferents have opposite effects on insular and somatosensory cortical processing

    Håkan W. Olausson;Jonathan Cole;Åke Vallbo;Francis McGlone

  • The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight

    Billy L. Luu;Brian L. Day;Jonathan D. Cole;Richard C. Fitzpatrick

  • Inferring another's expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation.

    Simone Bosbach;Jonathan Cole;Wolfgang Prinz;Günther Knoblich

  • An ultrafast system for signaling mechanical pain in human skin

    Saad S. Nagi;Saad S. Nagi;Andrew G. Marshall;Andrew G. Marshall;Adarsh Makdani;Ewa Jarocka

  • Lack of conscious recognition of one's own actions in a haptically deafferented patient.

    Pierre Fourneret;Jacques Paillard;Yves Lamarre;Jonathan Cole

  • The brain as part of an enactive system

    Shaun Gallagher;Daniel D. Hutto;Jan Slaby;Jonathan Cole

  • Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action.

    Patrick Haggard;Jonathan Cole

  • Unmyelinated tactile afferents underpin detection of low-force monofilaments.

    Jonathan Cole;M. Catherine Bushnell;Francis McGlone;Mikael Elam

  • Self-moved target eye tracking in control and deafferented subjects: roles of arm motor command and proprioception in arm-eye coordination

    Jean-Louis Vercher;Gm Gauthier;O Guedon;Jean Blouin

  • Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.

    R. Chris Miall;Nick M. Kitchen;Se-Ho Nam;Hannah Lefumat

  • The effect of sensory feedback on the timing of movements: Evidence from deafferented patients

    Prisca Stenneken;Wolfgang Prinz;Jonathan Cole;Jacques Paillard

  • Phantom limb pain after lower limb trauma: origins and treatments.

    Jens Foell;Robin Bekrater-Bodmann;Herta Flor;Jonathan Cole

  • toward Precision Psychiatry: statistical Platform for the Personalized Characterization of Natural Behaviors

    Elizabeth B. Torres;Robert W. Isenhower;Jillian Nguyen;Caroline Whyatt

  • Proprioception Contributes to the Sense of Agency during Visual Observation of Hand Movements: Evidence from Temporal Judgments of Action

    Daniela Balslev;Daniela Balslev;Jonathan Cole;R. Chris Miall

  • Sensory interactions for human balance control revealed by galvanic vestibular stimulation.

    Brian L. Day;Michel Guerraz;Jonathan Cole

Frequent Co-Authors

Håkan Olausson
Håkan Olausson Linköping University
Shaun Gallagher
Shaun Gallagher University of Memphis
Francis McGlone
Francis McGlone Liverpool John Moores University
M. Catherine Bushnell
M. Catherine Bushnell National Institutes of Health
Y. Lamarre
Y. Lamarre University of Montreal
Jean-Louis Vercher
Jean-Louis Vercher Aix-Marseille University
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Gisa Aschersleben
Gisa Aschersleben Saarland University
Riitta Hari
Riitta Hari Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degree and career options, especially for those interested in mental health and counseling. Many students consider branching into counseling or therapy roles, where an understanding of the brain is highly valued.

Online programs are making these pathways more accessible and affordable than ever. Those interested in school-based roles may explore specialized options like the university of the cumberlands school counseling degree, which is highly regarded for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness. For broader licensure opportunities, there are also cheapest online lpc programs that can prepare graduates for positions as Licensed Professional Counselors.

Those with an interest in family dynamics might consider the growing field of marriage and family therapy, with several accredited mft masters programs available online. Alternatively, advanced study in human behavior and research can be pursued through masters programs in psychology. These routes often complement a neuroscience foundation and can lead to specialized clinical or research roles.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Cole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles