World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5615
World Ranking
8574
National Ranking
636

Jonathan Cole publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Cole sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 123 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan Cole D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Cole sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan Cole is affiliated with Bournemouth University in the United Kingdom and specializes in neuroscience and medicine. Their research predominantly intersects cognitive neuroscience, physiology, social psychology, neurology, and molecular biology.

The primary topics explored in their work include:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Jonathan Cole has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications. Recent papers include:

  • One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research (2024), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • Innocuous pressure sensation requires A-type afferents but not functional ΡΙΕΖΟ2 channels in humans (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss (2021), published in Experimental Brain Research
  • Perception of body shape and size without touch or proprioception: evidence from individuals with congenital and acquired neuropathy (2021), published in Experimental Brain Research
  • The role of clinical neurophysiology in the definition and assessment of fatigue and fatigability (2023), published in Clinical Neurophysiology Practice

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Håkan Olausson
  • Marcin Szczot
  • Saad S. Nagi
  • R. Chris Miall
  • Richard B. Ivry

Jonathan Cole's work has appeared regularly in several academic venues with multiple contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Experimental Brain Research
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Nature Communications

The research profile reflects a consistent engagement with understanding brain function, sensory processing, and motor control mechanisms through interdisciplinary approaches that combine neuroscience and medicine.

Best Publications

  • Whole-body mapping of spatial acuity for pain and touch.

    Flavia Mancini;Armando Bauleo;Armando Bauleo;Jonathan Cole;Fausta Lui

  • Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject

    Shaun Gallagher;Jonathan Cole

  • Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia.

    Jonathan Cole;Simon Crowle;Greg Austwick;David Henderson Slater

  • The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task.

    H.A. Ingram;P. van Donkelaar;J. Cole;J.-L. Vercher

  • Functional role of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin: sympathetic response and perceptual localization

    Håkan Olausson;Jonathan Cole;Karin Rylander;Francis McGlone

  • Vestibular‐evoked postural responses in the absence of somatosensory information

    Brian L. Day;Jonathan Cole

  • Unmyelinated tactile afferents have opposite effects on insular and somatosensory cortical processing

    Håkan W. Olausson;Jonathan Cole;Åke Vallbo;Francis McGlone

  • The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight

    Billy L. Luu;Brian L. Day;Jonathan D. Cole;Richard C. Fitzpatrick

  • Inferring another's expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation.

    Simone Bosbach;Jonathan Cole;Wolfgang Prinz;Günther Knoblich

  • An ultrafast system for signaling mechanical pain in human skin

    Saad S. Nagi;Saad S. Nagi;Andrew G. Marshall;Andrew G. Marshall;Adarsh Makdani;Ewa Jarocka

  • Lack of conscious recognition of one's own actions in a haptically deafferented patient.

    Pierre Fourneret;Jacques Paillard;Yves Lamarre;Jonathan Cole

  • The brain as part of an enactive system

    Shaun Gallagher;Daniel D. Hutto;Jan Slaby;Jonathan Cole

  • Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action.

    Patrick Haggard;Jonathan Cole

  • Unmyelinated tactile afferents underpin detection of low-force monofilaments.

    Jonathan Cole;M. Catherine Bushnell;Francis McGlone;Mikael Elam

  • Self-moved target eye tracking in control and deafferented subjects: roles of arm motor command and proprioception in arm-eye coordination

    Jean-Louis Vercher;Gm Gauthier;O Guedon;Jean Blouin

  • Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.

    R. Chris Miall;Nick M. Kitchen;Se-Ho Nam;Hannah Lefumat

  • The effect of sensory feedback on the timing of movements: Evidence from deafferented patients

    Prisca Stenneken;Wolfgang Prinz;Jonathan Cole;Jacques Paillard

  • Phantom limb pain after lower limb trauma: origins and treatments.

    Jens Foell;Robin Bekrater-Bodmann;Herta Flor;Jonathan Cole

  • toward Precision Psychiatry: statistical Platform for the Personalized Characterization of Natural Behaviors

    Elizabeth B. Torres;Robert W. Isenhower;Jillian Nguyen;Caroline Whyatt

  • Proprioception Contributes to the Sense of Agency during Visual Observation of Hand Movements: Evidence from Temporal Judgments of Action

    Daniela Balslev;Daniela Balslev;Jonathan Cole;R. Chris Miall

  • Sensory interactions for human balance control revealed by galvanic vestibular stimulation.

    Brian L. Day;Michel Guerraz;Jonathan Cole

Frequent Co-Authors

Håkan Olausson
Håkan Olausson Linköping University
Shaun Gallagher
Shaun Gallagher University of Memphis
Francis McGlone
Francis McGlone Liverpool John Moores University
M. Catherine Bushnell
M. Catherine Bushnell National Institutes of Health
Y. Lamarre
Y. Lamarre University of Montreal
Jean-Louis Vercher
Jean-Louis Vercher Aix-Marseille University
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Gisa Aschersleben
Gisa Aschersleben Saarland University
Riitta Hari
Riitta Hari Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degree and career options, especially for those interested in mental health and counseling. Many students consider branching into counseling or therapy roles, where an understanding of the brain is highly valued.

Online programs are making these pathways more accessible and affordable than ever. Those interested in school-based roles may explore specialized options like the university of the cumberlands school counseling degree, which is highly regarded for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness. For broader licensure opportunities, there are also cheapest online lpc programs that can prepare graduates for positions as Licensed Professional Counselors.

Those with an interest in family dynamics might consider the growing field of marriage and family therapy, with several accredited mft masters programs available online. Alternatively, advanced study in human behavior and research can be pursued through masters programs in psychology. These routes often complement a neuroscience foundation and can lead to specialized clinical or research roles.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Cole

Trending Scientists