World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 68 6619 6000 482 433 407 14715

Ulrich Kulozik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrich Kulozik between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrich Kulozik published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2021. 8 of the 463 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2021. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 51 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1986 2025

463 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrich Kulozik: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 1
1988 3
1989 0
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 6
2003 11
2004 4
2005 5
2006 19
2007 21
2008 13
2009 15
2010 15
2011 28
2012 19
2013 15
2014 16
2015 21
2016 34
2017 24
2018 24
2019 31
2020 33
2021 51
2022 21
2023 9
2024 5
2025 3
Total 463
Download as CSV

Ulrich Kulozik publications per year - data summary

  • Ulrich Kulozik, a Chemistry scholar from Technical University of Munich, has 463 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 51 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1995, 1999 and 2001, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1991, 1994, 1996 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 13.2 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 89 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 17 publications (1.2 per year); 2000-2013: 174 publications (12.4 per year); 2014-2025: 272 publications (22.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ulrich Kulozik publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Kulozik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 407 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397 407
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrich Kulozik publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 61–80 to 1,295+ publications.
  • Ulrich Kulozik, a Chemistry scholar from Technical University of Munich, records 407 publications - the 81st percentile of the discipline.
  • 81% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Ulrich Kulozik, and about 19% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 241–260 publications range, and Ulrich Kulozik ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 161–180 publications, holding 1,350 scientists (8% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 361–380 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ulrich Kulozik D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Kulozik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683 68
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Ulrich Kulozik D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 17,934 Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 159+ D-Index.
  • Ulrich Kulozik, a Chemistry scholar from Technical University of Munich, records 68 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Chemistry scientists score the same or lower than Ulrich Kulozik, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 62–63 D-Index range, and Ulrich Kulozik ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 56–57 D-Index, holding 1,051 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Distinguished Service Award, American Dairy Science Association

Overview

Ulrich Kulozik is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. They have made notable contributions in the domain of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on Food Science, which accounts for the majority of their research output. Their work also spans subfields such as Molecular Biology, Water Science and Technology, Biomedical Engineering, and Biomaterials.

Their research topics cover a range of specialized areas including:

  • Proteins in Food Systems
  • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
  • Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
  • Food Drying and Modeling
  • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications

Kulozik's recent publications illustrate their focus on protein chemistry and food processing technologies. Key papers include:

  • Influence of extraction conditions on the conformational alteration of pea protein extracted from pea flour, 2020, Food Hydrocolloids
  • Influence of pH and ionic strength on the thermal gelation behaviour of pea protein, 2021, Food Hydrocolloids
  • Invited review: Heat stability of milk and concentrated milk: Past, present, and future research objectives, 2020, Journal of Dairy Science
  • Surface and foaming properties of potato proteins: Impact of protein concentration, pH value and ionic strength, 2020, Food Hydrocolloids
  • Towards recombinantly produced milk proteins: Physicochemical and emulsifying properties of engineered whey protein beta-lactoglobulin variants, 2020, Food Hydrocolloids

Frequent collaborators in their research include Caren Tanger, Simon Schiffer, Michael Reitmaier, David J. Andlinger, and Martin Hartinger. This indicates a network of co-authorship primarily centered on food-related biochemical research.

Kulozik's publications are often found in journals and venues such as:

  • Foods
  • Food Hydrocolloids
  • International Dairy Journal
  • Journal of Food Engineering
  • Food and Bioproducts Processing

Their work has been recognized with a Distinguished Service Award from the American Dairy Science Association in 2019. This award suggests contributions to the field of dairy science in addition to broader food science topics.

Best Publications

  • Alternative Drying Processes for the Industrial Preservation of Lactic Acid Starter Cultures

    Chalat Santivarangkna;Ulrich Kulozik;Petra Foerst

  • Microencapsulation of Probiotic Cells for Food Applications

    Thomas Heidebach;Petra Först;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes.

    C. Santivarangkna;U. Kulozik;P. Foerst

  • Influence of casein-based microencapsulation on freeze-drying and storage of probiotic cells

    Thomas Heidebach;Petra Först;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Microencapsulation of probiotic cells by means of rennet-gelation of milk proteins

    Thomas Heidebach;Petra Först;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Influence of extraction conditions on the conformational alteration of pea protein extracted from pea flour

    Caren Tanger;Julia Engel;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Preparation of novel whey protein-based aerogels as drug carriers for life science applications

    M. Betz;C.A. García-González;R.P. Subrahmanyam;I. Smirnova

  • Transglutaminase-induced caseinate gelation for the microencapsulation of probiotic cells

    Thomas Heidebach;Petra Först;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Fractionation of α-Lactalbumin and β-Lactoglobulin from Whey Protein Isolate Using Selective Thermal Aggregation, an Optimized Membrane Separation Procedure and Resolubilization Techniques at Pilot Plant Scale

    José Toro-Sierra;Alexander Tolkach;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Reaction kinetic pathway of reversible and irreversible thermal denaturation of β-lactoglobulin

    Alexander Tolkach;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Transglutaminase cross-linking of milk proteins and impact on yoghurt gel properties

    Martin P. Bönisch;Manfred Huss;Kerstin Weitl;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Fractionation of whey proteins and caseinomacropeptide by means of enzymatic crosslinking and membrane separation techniques

    Alexander Tolkach;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Influence of pH and ionic strength on the thermal gelation behaviour of pea protein

    Caren Tanger;Michaela Müller;David Andlinger;Ulrich Kulozik

  • Microbial biodiversity, quality and shelf life of microfiltered and pasteurized extended shelf life (ESL) milk from Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

    Verena S.J. Schmidt;Veronika Kaufmann;Ulrich Kulozik;Siegfried Scherer

  • Impact of water activity, temperature, and physical state on the storage stability of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei freeze-dried in a lactose matrix.

    Bettina Higl;Lone Kurtmann;Charlotte U. Carlsen;Jennifer Ratjen

  • Impact of colloidal interactions on the flux in cross-flow microfiltration of milk at different pH values: A surface energy approach

    W. Kühnl;A. Piry;V. Kaufmann;T. Grein

  • Preparation and comparative release characteristics of three anthocyanin encapsulation systems.

    Johannes Oidtmann;Markus Schantz;Karsten Mäder;Matthias Baum

  • Kinetics of Formation and Physicochemical Characterization of Thermally-Induced β-Lactoglobulin Aggregates

    R.N. Zúñiga;A. Tolkach;U. Kulozik;J.M. Aguilera

  • Effect of pre-heating on the foaming properties of whey protein isolate using a membrane foaming apparatus

    A. Bals;U. Kulozik

  • Damage of cell envelope of Lactobacillus helveticus during vacuum drying

    C. Santivarangkna;M. Wenning;P. Foerst;U. Kulozik

  • Influence of a thermal treatment on the functionality of hen’s egg yolk in mayonnaise

    Fabien Guilmineau;Ulrich Kulozik

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Hinrichs
Jörg Hinrichs University of Hohenheim
Irina Smirnova
Irina Smirnova Hamburg University of Technology
Elke Richling
Elke Richling Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Peter Müller-Buschbaum
Peter Müller-Buschbaum Technical University of Munich
Antonio Delgado
Antonio Delgado University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Dirk Haller
Dirk Haller Technical University of Munich
Stefan Heinrich
Stefan Heinrich Hamburg University of Technology
Manfred Burghammer
Manfred Burghammer European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
Wolfgang Peukert
Wolfgang Peukert University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Christian Riekel
Christian Riekel European Synchrotron Radiation Facility

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career paths. For those looking to start with foundational knowledge, online criminal justice associate degree programs offer flexible options that can complement scientific skills, especially in forensic chemistry. Understanding how much does a criminal justice degree cost is crucial for planning your educational investment wisely.

Another valuable credential to consider is a paralegal certificate. This certification can enhance your profile, especially if you are interested in patent law or regulatory affairs related to chemistry and pharmaceuticals.

For Chemistry graduates fascinated by the pharmaceutical industry, pursuing a career as a drug rep is an attractive option. Learning how much do drug reps make helps gauge the potential financial rewards in this field.

Whether your passion lies in science, law, or sales, understanding these diverse educational paths and career options allows you to make informed decisions that align with your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Kulozik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles