World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 75 1170 1043 603 524 374 32502

Cyril H. Benes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cyril H. Benes between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cyril H. Benes published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 23.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 397 publications in 2023. 31 of the 689 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 397. Peak 397 publications in 2023. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 397 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 26 publications
1997 2025

689 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cyril H. Benes: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 3
2010 0
2011 11
2012 14
2013 26
2014 21
2015 19
2016 23
2017 31
2018 39
2019 30
2020 13
2021 11
2022 8
2023 397
2024 5
2025 26
Total 689
Download as CSV

Cyril H. Benes publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cyril H. Benes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 367–376 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 374 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26 374
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Cyril H. Benes D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cyril H. Benes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89 75
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Cyril H. Benes is a researcher affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their work spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a significant focus on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Cell Biology.

Their research investigates multiple aspects of cancer biology and therapeutics, particularly emphasizing cancer genomics and diagnostics, computational drug discovery methods, RNA modifications related to cancer, neuroblastoma research and treatments, cancer hypoxia and metabolism, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, and mechanisms underlying cancer therapeutics.

Recent published papers by Cyril H. Benes include:

  • Effective drug combinations in breast, colon and pancreatic cancer cells (2022, Nature)
  • Three subtypes of lung cancer fibroblasts define distinct therapeutic paradigms (2021, Cancer Cell)
  • MET Alterations Are a Recurring and Actionable Resistance Mechanism in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer (2020, Clinical Cancer Research)
  • Pharmacological blockade of TEAD-YAP reveals its therapeutic limitation in cancer cells (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Therapy-induced APOBEC3A drives evolution of persistent cancer cells (2023, Nature)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Cyril H. Benes include:

  • Patricia Greninger
  • Regina K. Egan
  • Ellen Murchie
  • Mikhail G. Dozmorov
  • Anthony C. Faber

Common venues where Cyril H. Benes has published encompass:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells

    Wanjuan Yang;Jorge Soares;Patricia Greninger;Elena J. Edelman

  • Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells

    Mathew J. Garnett;Elena J. Edelman;Sonja J. Heidorn;Christopher Greenman;Christopher Greenman

  • A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer

    Francesco Iorio;Francesco Iorio;Theo A. Knijnenburg;Theo A. Knijnenburg;Daniel J. Vis;Graham R. Bignell

  • Mechanisms of Acquired Crizotinib Resistance in ALK-Rearranged Lung Cancers

    Ryohei Katayama;Alice T. Shaw;Alice T. Shaw;Tahsin M. Khan;Tahsin M. Khan;Mari Mino-Kenudson

  • Ex vivo culture of circulating breast tumor cells for individualized testing of drug susceptibility

    Min Yu;Min Yu;Aditya Bardia;Nicola Aceto;Francesca Bersani

  • Targeting transcription regulation in cancer with a covalent CDK7 inhibitor

    Nicholas Kwiatkowski;Tinghu Zhang;Peter B. Rahl;Brian J Abraham

  • Targeting MYCN in Neuroblastoma by BET Bromodomain Inhibition

    Alexandre Puissant;Stacey M. Frumm;Gabriela Alexe;Christopher F. Bassil

  • Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets

    Nicolas Stransky;Mahmoud Ghandi

  • Alternative lengthening of telomeres renders cancer cells hypersensitive to ATR inhibitors

    Rachel Litman Flynn;Rachel Litman Flynn;Kelli E. Cox;Maya Jeitany;Hiroaki Wakimoto

  • Stromal Microenvironment Shapes the Intratumoral Architecture of Pancreatic Cancer

    Matteo Ligorio;Srinjoy Sil;Jose Malagon-Lopez;Linda T. Nieman

  • Synthetic lethal interaction of combined BCL-XL and MEK inhibition promotes tumor regressions in KRAS mutant cancer models.

    Ryan B. Corcoran;Katherine A. Cheng;Aaron N. Hata;Anthony C. Faber

  • HER2 expression identifies dynamic functional states within circulating breast cancer cells

    Nicole Vincent Jordan;Aditya Bardia;Ben S. Wittner;Cyril Benes

  • AMG 176, a Selective MCL1 Inhibitor, Is Effective in Hematologic Cancer Models Alone and in Combination with Established Therapies.

    Sean Caenepeel;Sean P Brown;Brian Belmontes;Gordon Moody

  • ATR inhibition disrupts rewired homologous recombination and fork protection pathways in PARP inhibitor-resistant BRCA-deficient cancer cells.

    Stephanie A. Yazinski;Valentine Comaills;Rémi Buisson;Marie Michelle Genois

  • BIM expression in treatment naïve cancers predicts responsiveness to kinase inhibitors

    Anthony C. Faber;Ryan B. Corcoran;Hiromichi Ebi;Lecia V. Sequist

  • TAK1 Inhibition Promotes Apoptosis in KRAS-Dependent Colon Cancers

    Anurag Singh;Michael F. Sweeney;Min Yu;Alexa Burger

  • Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase.

    Rémi Buisson;Jessica L. Boisvert;Cyril H. Benes;Lee Zou

  • The C2 domain of PKCdelta is a phosphotyrosine binding domain.

    Cyril H. Benes;Ning Wu;Andrew E.H. Elia;Tejal Dharia

  • TAS-120 Overcomes Resistance to ATP-Competitive FGFR Inhibitors in Patients with FGFR2 Fusion–Positive Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

    Lipika Goyal;Lei Shi;Leah Y Liu;Ferran Fece de la Cruz

  • Passenger hotspot mutations in cancer driven by APOBEC3A and mesoscale genomic features

    Rémi Buisson;Rémi Buisson;Adam Langenbucher;Danae Bowen;Eugene E. Kwan

Frequent Co-Authors

Mathew J. Garnett
Mathew J. Garnett Wellcome Sanger Institute
Jeffrey A. Engelman
Jeffrey A. Engelman Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research (NIBR)
Ultan McDermott
Ultan McDermott AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Daniel A. Haber
Daniel A. Haber Harvard University
Olivier Elemento
Olivier Elemento Cornell University
Wafik S. El-Deiry
Wafik S. El-Deiry Brown University
Jeffrey Settleman
Jeffrey Settleman Pfizer (Germany)
Alice T. Shaw
Alice T. Shaw Harvard University
Sridhar Ramaswamy
Sridhar Ramaswamy Harvard University
Lecia V. Sequist
Lecia V. Sequist Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in molecular biology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Many students look for flexible learning options that align with their professional goals and lifestyles. For example, programs like capella rn to bsn vs chamberlain rn to bsn highlight how different institutions offer varied curriculum structures and support services, which is important to consider when choosing an online degree.

For those considering an advanced healthcare path, there are accessible online bsn programs available, often featuring accelerated tracks and affordable tuition. Finding a reputable school is critical for a quality education—many students prefer nonprofit online colleges that offer accredited programs with solid student support.

If you’re an active-duty military member or veteran, you might prioritize flexible scheduling and tuition assistance. Several academic institutions offer dedicated resources for service members, and some of the best in the country are recognized as top online military friendly colleges.

Best Scientists Citing Cyril H. Benes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles