World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
186
Citations
292313
World Ranking
477
National Ranking
313

Medicine

D-Index
188
Citations
319723
World Ranking
268
National Ranking
180

Todd R. Golub publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd R. Golub sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 527 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Todd R. Golub D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd R. Golub sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 188 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in United States Leader Award
  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2008 - E. Mead Johnson Award, Society for Pediatric Research
  • 2007 - Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Todd R. Golub is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed significantly to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their research spans various subfields, including molecular biology, cancer research, genetics, oncology, and immunology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

They have published numerous papers in respected scientific venues. Some of the recent publications include:

  • "Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins" (2022, Science)
  • "Discovering the anticancer potential of non-oncology drugs by systematic viability profiling" (2020, Nature Cancer)
  • "A metastasis map of human cancer cell lines" (2020, Nature)
  • "The CDK inhibitor CR8 acts as a molecular glue degrader that depletes cyclin K" (2020, Nature)
  • "Fatty acid synthesis is required for breast cancer brain metastasis" (2021, Nature Cancer)

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Francisca Vázquez
  • David E. Root
  • Jennifer A. Roth
  • Jesse S. Boehm
  • William C. Hahn

Their work appears often in notable publication venues, including:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Nature Cancer

Todd R. Golub has received several professional recognitions, including:

  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 2014
  • E. Mead Johnson Award, Society for Pediatric Research, 2008
  • Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 2007
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Best Publications

  • Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles

    Aravind Subramanian;Pablo Tamayo;Vamsi K. Mootha;Sayan Mukherjee

  • Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.

    T. R. Golub;T. R. Golub;D. K. Slonim;P. Tamayo;C. Huard

  • MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers

    Jun Lu;Gad Getz;Eric A. Miska;Eric A. Miska;Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra

  • PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes

    Vamsi K Mootha;Cecilia M Lindgren;Cecilia M Lindgren;Karl-Fredrik Eriksson;Aravind Subramanian

  • Integrated Genomic Analysis Identifies Clinically Relevant Subtypes of Glioblastoma Characterized by Abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1

    Roel G. W. Verhaak;Katherine A. Hoadley;Elizabeth Purdom;Victoria Wang

  • The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity

    Jordi Barretina;Giordano Caponigro;Nicolas Stransky;Kavitha Venkatesan

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways

    Roger McLendon;Allan Friedman;Darrell Bigner;Erwin G. Van Meir

  • Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes

    Michael S. Lawrence;Petar Stojanov;Petar Stojanov;Paz Polak;Paz Polak;Paz Polak;Gregory V. Kryukov;Gregory V. Kryukov;Gregory V. Kryukov

  • The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease

    Justin Lamb;Emily D. Crawford;David Peck;Joshua W. Modell

  • The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers

    Rameen Beroukhim;Craig H. Mermel;Craig H. Mermel;Dale Porter;Guo Wei

  • Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: Methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation

    Pablo Tamayo;Donna Slonim;Jill Mesirov;Qing Zhu

  • Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis.

    Ross L. Levine;Ross L. Levine;Martha Wadleigh;Jan Cools;Benjamin L. Ebert;Benjamin L. Ebert

  • A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles.

    Aravind Subramanian;Rajiv Narayan;Steven M. Corsello;Steven M. Corsello;David D. Peck

  • Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types

    Michael S. Lawrence;Petar Stojanov;Craig H. Mermel;James T. Robinson

  • Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses

    Arindam Bhattacharjee;William G. Richards;Jane Staunton;Cheng Li

  • Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

    Dinesh Singh;Phillip G. Febbo;Phillip G. Febbo;Kenneth Ross;Donald G. Jackson

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning

    Margaret A. Shipp;Ken N. Ross;Pablo Tamayo;Andrew P. Weng

  • A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors.

    Sridhar Ramaswamy;Ken N. Ross;Eric S. Lander;Todd R. Golub;Todd R. Golub

  • Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression

    Scott L. Pomeroy;Pablo Tamayo;Michelle Gaasenbeek;Lisa M. Sturla

  • The Mutational Landscape of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    N. Stransky;A. M. Egloff;A. D. Tward;A. D. Kostic

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric S. Lander
Eric S. Lander Broad Institute
Gad Getz
Gad Getz Broad Institute
Matthew Meyerson
Matthew Meyerson Harvard University
Benjamin L. Ebert
Benjamin L. Ebert Harvard University
Levi A. Garraway
Levi A. Garraway Roche (United States)
William C. Hahn
William C. Hahn Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Jesse S. Boehm
Jesse S. Boehm Broad Institute
Michael S. Lawrence
Michael S. Lawrence Harvard University
Francisca Vazquez
Francisca Vazquez Broad Institute
David E. Root
David E. Root Broad Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in the medical field but want flexible, alternative pathways, several online degrees and career options are available. One popular route is pursuing a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) credential. Curious about what is the fastest way to become an lpn? Accelerated online LPN programs can prepare you for entry-level nursing roles quickly.

For those aiming to specialize, online programs for psychiatric nursing may be ideal. Psych nurse practitioner programs provide opportunities to earn a master's degree and focus on mental health, all while studying remotely.

Leadership roles in healthcare are also accessible online. When weighing your options, consider factors like healthcare administration degree cost to ensure your education aligns with your financial planning. For budget-conscious students, exploring the cheapest mha programs online healthcare can help you advance your career without excessive debt.

Online degrees in medicine and healthcare provide flexibility and allow working professionals and students alike to pursue in-demand careers at their own pace and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Todd R. Golub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles