World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Aaron M. Dollar

Aaron M. Dollar

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 60 687 624 300 252 261 17043
Electronics and Electrical Engineering 60 1602 1532 653 609 261 17003

Aaron M. Dollar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aaron M. Dollar between 1957 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aaron M. Dollar published across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2014. 22 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2014. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 35 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 9 publications
1957 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aaron M. Dollar: publications per year, 1957 to 2025
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 3
2006 5
2007 6
2008 4
2009 1
2010 8
2011 18
2012 15
2013 18
2014 35
2015 31
2016 22
2017 22
2018 14
2019 17
2020 14
2021 11
2022 11
2023 10
2024 13
2025 9
Total 289
Download as CSV

Aaron M. Dollar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron M. Dollar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 257–266 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 261 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95 261
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Aaron M. Dollar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aaron M. Dollar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37 60
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Aaron M. Dollar is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a specific focus on several subfields including Control and Systems Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms

The scientist has published extensively in notable venues, frequently contributing to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
  • Science Robotics
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Aaron M. Dollar include:

  • Complex In-Hand Manipulation Via Compliance-Enabled Finger Gaiting and Multi-Modal Planning, 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Complex manipulation with a simple robotic hand through contact breaking and caging, 2021, Science Robotics
  • Manipulation for self-Identification, and self-Identification for better manipulation, 2021, Science Robotics
  • Model Predictive Actor-Critic: Accelerating Robot Skill Acquisition with Deep Reinforcement Learning, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quantifying Prosthetic and Intact Limb Use in Upper Limb Amputees via Egocentric Video: An Unsupervised, At-Home Study, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics

Frequent coauthors in their body of work include:

  • Andrew S. Morgan
  • Kaiyu Hang
  • Yuri Gloumakov
  • Adam J. Spiers
  • Vatsal Patel

Best Publications

  • Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art

    A.M. Dollar;H. Herr

  • The GRASP Taxonomy of Human Grasp Types

    Thomas Feix;Javier Romero;Heinz-Bodo Schmiedmayer;Aaron M. Dollar

  • Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review.

    Joseph T. Belter;Jacob L. Segil;Aaron M. Dollar;Richard F. Weir

  • The YCB object and Model set: Towards common benchmarks for manipulation research

    Berk Calli;Arjun Singh;Aaron Walsman;Siddhartha Srinivasa

  • A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation

    Lael U. Odhner;Leif P. Jentoft;Mark R. Claffee;Nicholas Corson

  • The Highly Adaptive SDM Hand: Design and Performance Evaluation

    Aaron M. Dollar;Robert D. Howe

  • Benchmarking in Manipulation Research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley Object and Model Set

    Berk Calli;Aaron Walsman;Arjun Singh;Siddhartha Srinivasa

  • Grasping from the air: Hovering capture and load stability

    Paul E. I. Pounds;Daniel R. Bersak;Aaron M. Dollar

  • Yale-CMU-Berkeley dataset for robotic manipulation research:

    Berk Çalli;Arjun Singh;James Bruce;Aaron Walsman

  • Stability of small-scale UAV helicopters and quadrotors with added payload mass under PID control

    Paul E. Pounds;Daniel R. Bersak;Aaron M. Dollar

  • A modular, open-source 3D printed underactuated hand

    Raymond R. Ma;Lael U. Odhner;Aaron M. Dollar

  • A robust compliant grasper via shape deposition manufacturing

    A.M. Dollar;R.D. Howe

  • Benchmarking in Manipulation Research: The YCB Object and Model Set and Benchmarking Protocols.

    Berk Çalli;Aaron Walsman;Arjun Singh;Siddhartha S. Srinivasa

  • Grasp Frequency and Usage in Daily Household and Machine Shop Tasks

    I. M. Bullock;J. Z. Zheng;S. D. L. Rosa;C. Guertler

  • A Hand-Centric Classification of Human and Robot Dexterous Manipulation

    I. M. Bullock;R. R. Ma;A. M. Dollar

  • Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness and Propulsive Work of the Human Ankle in the Stance Phase of Walking

    Kamran Shamaei;Gregory S. Sawicki;Aaron M. Dollar

  • Analysis of human grasping behavior: object characteristics and grasp type.

    Thomas Feix;Ian M. Bullock;Aaron M. Dollar

  • Biomechanical considerations in the design of lower limb exoskeletons

    Massimo Cenciarini;Aaron M. Dollar

  • An investigation of grasp type and frequency in daily household and machine shop tasks

    Joshua Z. Zheng;Sara De La Rosa;Aaron M. Dollar

  • On dexterity and dexterous manipulation

    Raymond R. Ma;Aaron M. Dollar

  • Performance characteristics of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands

    Joseph T. Belter;Aaron M. Dollar

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Howe
Robert D. Howe Harvard University
Pieter Abbeel
Pieter Abbeel University of California, Berkeley
Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
Siddhartha S. Srinivasa University of Washington
Danica Kragic
Danica Kragic Royal Institute of Technology
Kostas E. Bekris
Kostas E. Bekris Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Kurt Konolige
Kurt Konolige Google (United States)
Martin Buehler
Martin Buehler Boston Dynamics (United States)
Just L. Herder
Just L. Herder Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often leads students to consider complementary or alternative career pathways. For example, some may be drawn to fields requiring specialized skill sets and certifications, such as Speech-Language Pathology (SLP). Understanding the requirements for entry into these programs is crucial; reviewing details like slp acceptance rate can help prospective students gauge their chances of admission.

Additionally, the cost of pursuing an online degree is an important factor. Many opt for flexible learning options to balance work and study, so knowing the speech pathology online program cost allows for better financial planning. Students might also consider how quickly they can complete their programs; options like the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis are attractive for those eager to advance their careers expediently.

For those searching for accessible programs, identifying the easiest slp programs to get into may provide a strategic advantage in gaining admission without compromising educational quality. Overall, interdisciplinary knowledge and flexible degree options can greatly enhance career prospects within and beyond engineering fields.

Best Scientists Citing Aaron M. Dollar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles