World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2208 2012 245 229 220 13383

Christopher Ring publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher Ring between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher Ring published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2008. 13 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2008. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 3 publications
1991 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher Ring: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 4
1999 2
2000 7
2001 10
2002 14
2003 5
2004 5
2005 14
2006 9
2007 11
2008 16
2009 10
2010 6
2011 3
2012 8
2013 12
2014 3
2015 9
2016 8
2017 7
2018 11
2019 11
2020 6
2021 13
2022 8
2023 10
2024 10
2025 3
Total 243
Download as CSV

Christopher Ring publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Ring sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 220 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 220
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher Ring D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher Ring sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher Ring is a researcher affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across the fields of medicine and psychology, with notable focus on applied psychology, social psychology, orthopedics and sports medicine, sociology and political science, and complementary and alternative medicine.

The topics covered in their work include behavioral health and interventions, cardiovascular and exercise physiology, doping in sports, heart rate variability and autonomic control, motivation and self-concept in sports, sports performance and training, and hormonal and reproductive studies.

Christopher Ring has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
  • Psychophysiology
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Journal of Sports Sciences

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Christopher Ring include:

  • Measuring interoception: The phase adjustment task, 2021, Biological Psychology
  • A Moral Intervention Reduces Doping Likelihood in British and Greek Athletes: Evidence From a Cluster Randomized Control Trial, 2020, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Concurrent brain endurance training improves endurance exercise performance, 2020, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
  • Cognitive tasks elicit mental fatigue and impair subsequent physical task endurance: Effects of task duration and type, 2022, Psychophysiology
  • Brain Endurance Training Improves Physical, Cognitive, and Multitasking Performance in Professional Football Players, 2022, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Frequent collaborators in Christopher Ring's research include:

  • Maria Kavussanu
  • Philip Hurst
  • Neil Dallaway
  • Jesús Díaz-García
  • Tomás García-Calvo

Best Publications

  • Mortality and quality of life 12 months after myocardial infarction: effects of depression and anxiety.

    Lane D;Carroll D;Ring C;Beevers Dg

  • Towards a psychophysics of interoceptive processes: the measurement of heartbeat detection

    Jasper Brener;Christopher Ring

  • Stress and secretory immunity

    Jos A Bosch;Christopher Ring;Eco J C de Geus;Enno C I Veerman

  • The prevalence and persistence of depression and anxiety following myocardial infarction.

    Deirdre Lane;Douglas Carroll;Christopher Ring;D. Gareth Beevers

  • Effects of heartbeat feedback on beliefs about heart rate and heartbeat counting: a cautionary tale about interoceptive awareness.

    Christopher Ring;Jasper Brener;Kelley Knapp;Jennifer Mailloux

  • Preparation for action.

    Jean Requin;Jasper Brener;Christopher Ring

  • Blood pressure reactions to stress and the prediction of future blood pressure: effects of sex, age, and socioeconomic position.

    Douglas Carroll;Christopher Ring;Kate Hunt;Graeme Ford

  • Heartbeat counting is unrelated to heartbeat detection: A comparison of methods to quantify interoception

    Christopher Ring;Jasper Brener

  • Predictors of attendance at cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction

    Deirdre Lane;Douglas Carroll;Christopher Ring;D.Gareth Beevers

  • Effects of depression and anxiety on mortality and quality-of-life 4 months after myocardial infarction

    Deirdre Lane;Douglas Carroll;Christopher Ring;D.Gareth Beevers

  • Quiet eye training expedites motor learning and aids performance under heightened anxiety: The roles of response programming and external attention

    Lee J. Moore;Samuel J. Vine;Andrew Cooke;Christopher Ring

  • Coaching Efficacy and Coaching Effectiveness: Examining Their Predictors and Comparing Coaches’ and Athletes’ Reports

    Maria Kavussanu;Ian David Boardley;Natalia Jutkiewicz;Samantha Vincent

  • Secretory immunoglobulin A and cardiovascular reactions to mental arithmetic and cold pressor

    Gonneke Willemsen;Christopher Ring;Douglas Carroll;Phil Evans

  • Acute stress exposure prior to influenza vaccination enhances antibody response in women

    Kate M. Edwards;Victoria E. Burns;Tracy Reynolds;Douglas Carroll

  • Athletes’ Perceptions of Coaching Effectiveness and Athlete-Related Outcomes in Rugby Union: An Investigation Based on the Coaching Efficacy Model

    Ian D Boardley;Maria Kavussanu;Christopher M Ring

  • Influence of beliefs about heart rate and actual heart rate on heartbeat counting.

    Christopher Ring;Jasper Brener

  • Catastrophizing is related to pain ratings, but not nociceptive flexion reflex threshold

    Mustafa al'Absi;Christopher Ring

  • Observed Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors in Male and Female Soccer Players

    Maria Kavussanu;Rebecca Stamp;Geoff Slade;Christopher Ring

  • Perceived stress and psychological well-being are associated with antibody status after meningitis C conjugate vaccination.

    Victoria E. Burns;Mark Drayson;Christopher Ring;Douglas Carroll

  • Psychological, muscular and kinematic factors mediate performance under pressure

    Andrew Cooke;Maria Kavussanu;David McIntyre;Christopher Ring

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas Carroll
Douglas Carroll University of Birmingham
Maria Kavussanu
Maria Kavussanu University of Birmingham
Mark T. Drayson
Mark T. Drayson University of Birmingham
Jos A. Bosch
Jos A. Bosch University of Amsterdam
Gonneke Willemsen
Gonneke Willemsen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Deirdre A. Lane
Deirdre A. Lane University of Liverpool
Mustafa al'Absi
Mustafa al'Absi University of Minnesota
Anna C. Phillips
Anna C. Phillips University of Birmingham
Ian D. Boardley
Ian D. Boardley University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of meaningful careers. One evolving field is substance abuse counseling, which requires specialized knowledge and certification that can often be gained through online psychology or counseling degrees.

Requirements for certification vary by location, so it’s important to understand each state’s process. For example, Laredo substance abuse counselor certification requirements emphasize specific coursework and state-approved internships.

In Nevada, Las Vegas substance abuse counselor certification requirements include background checks and supervised practical experience. Similarly, those interested in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Lexington should review local educational prerequisites and exam procedures.

Aspiring professionals should also look at the Lincoln substance abuse counselor certification requirements for insight into Nebraska’s unique expectations, including ongoing education for license renewal.

Online degrees can help meet these prerequisites while providing flexibility. They are a practical choice for those looking to enter or advance in counseling, mental health, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher Ring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles