World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8140 7599 4368 3975 197 8455
Neuroscience 40 8002 7391 3436 3108 217 8544

Jamie L. Rhudy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jamie L. Rhudy between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jamie L. Rhudy published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2007. 21 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2007. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 10 publications
1997 2025

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jamie L. Rhudy: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 17
2008 10
2009 12
2010 11
2011 15
2012 9
2013 14
2014 9
2015 13
2016 9
2017 11
2018 8
2019 16
2020 8
2021 10
2022 10
2023 7
2024 11
2025 10
Total 229
Download as CSV

Jamie L. Rhudy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie L. Rhudy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 217 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 217
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jamie L. Rhudy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie L. Rhudy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jamie L. Rhudy is affiliated with the University of Tulsa in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Pharmacology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The researcher focuses mainly on topics related to pain, with notable attention to musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pain mechanisms and treatments, and pain management including the placebo effect. Additional areas of interest include fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, pediatric pain management techniques, opioid use disorder treatment, and studies involving anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Frequent venues for their publications include the Journal of Pain, where they have published extensively, as well as the Journal of Pain Research, Pain, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, and the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.

The following are some of their recent papers, showing a range of topics within pain research and associated cognitive and affective phenomena:

  • Examining Configural, Metric, and Scalar Invariance of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Native American and Non-Hispanic White Adults in the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP), 2020, Journal of Pain Research
  • The Relationship Between Adverse Life Events and Endogenous Inhibition of Pain and Spinal Nociception: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP), 2021, Journal of Pain
  • The Effect of Pain Catastrophizing on Endogenous Inhibition of Pain and Spinal Nociception in Native Americans: Results From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk, 2020, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Heightened affective response to perturbation of respiratory but not pain signals in eating, mood, and anxiety disorders, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Emotion regulation and the salience network: a hypothetical integrative model of fibromyalgia, 2022, Nature Reviews Rheumatology

Jamie L. Rhudy often collaborates with a select group of coauthors, including Joanna O. Shadlow, Parker A. Kell, Felicitas A. Huber, Tyler A. Toledo, and Erin N. Street, with collaboration counts ranging from 15 to 33 publications per coauthor.

Best Publications

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • Fear and anxiety: divergent effects on human pain thresholds

    Jamie L Rhudy;Mary W Meagher

  • Pain and emotion: effects of affective picture modulation.

    Mary W. Meagher;Randolph C. Arnau;Jamie L. Rhudy

  • Longitudinal effects of hope on depression and anxiety: A latent variable analysis.

    Randolph C. Arnau;David H. Rosen;John F. Finch;Jamie L. Rhudy

  • Affective modulation of nociception at spinal and supraspinal levels

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Mary Anh Thù V. Nguyê˜n

  • Defining the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold in human participants: A comparison of different scoring criteria

    Jamie L. Rhudy

  • Psychological Risk Factors in Headache

    Robert A. Nicholson;Timothy T. Houle;Jamie L. Rhudy;Peter J. Norton

  • Emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON): Do affective valence and arousal play a role?

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Jennifer L. Russell

  • The role of emotion in pain modulation.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Mary W. Meagher

  • Negative affect: effects on an evaluative measure of human pain.

    Jamie L Rhudy;Mary W Meagher

  • Gender differences in pain: do emotions play a role?

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams

  • Emotional modulation of spinal nociception and pain: the impact of predictable noxious stimulation.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Philip L. Rambo

  • Emotion regulation and the salience network: a hypothetical integrative model of fibromyalgia

    Unknown

  • Increased anterior insula activity in anxious individuals is linked to diminished perceived control

    R P Alvarez;N Kirlic;M Misaki;J Bodurka

  • Characteristics of Chronic Nightmares in a Trauma-Exposed Treatment-Seeking Sample

    Joanne L. Davis;Patricia Byrd;Jamie L. Rhudy;David C. Wright

  • Noise stress and human pain thresholds: divergent effects in men and women.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Mary W. Meagher

  • Using normalized EMG to define the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold: further evaluation of standardized NFR scoring criteria.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Sarah McGlone

  • Partial Sleep Deprivation Attenuates the Positive Affective System: Effects Across Multiple Measurement Modalities.

    Patrick H. Finan;Phillip J. Quartana;Bethany Remeniuk;Eric L. Garland

  • Emotional modulation of pain and spinal nociception in fibromyalgia

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Jennifer L. DelVentura;Ellen L. Terry;Emily J. Bartley

  • Habituation, sensitization, and emotional valence modulation of pain responses.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Emily J. Bartley;Amy E. Williams

  • Physiological Predictors of Response to Exposure, Relaxation, and Rescripting Therapy for Chronic Nightmares in a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Joanne L. Davis;Jamie L. Rhudy;Kristi E. Pruiksma;Patricia Byrd

  • Pain catastrophizing is related to temporal summation of pain but not temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Satin L. Martin;Ellen L. Terry

  • Do affective valence and arousal play a role

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Jennifer L. Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne L. Davis
Joanne L. Davis University of Tulsa
Herman A. Taylor
Herman A. Taylor Morehouse School of Medicine
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Ole Kæseler Andersen
Ole Kæseler Andersen Aalborg University
Sahib S. Khalsa
Sahib S. Khalsa Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Peter J. Norton
Peter J. Norton Monash University
Eric L. Garland
Eric L. Garland University of Utah
Barbara E. Ainsworth
Barbara E. Ainsworth Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering Neuroscience, you may also be interested in related online degrees and career options within psychology, counseling, and social sciences. Online programs offer flexibility and accessibility for diverse learners looking to advance their education without pausing their careers.

For those looking for affordable academic options, cheap psychology degree online programs are available, helping students minimize student debt while pursuing a foundational discipline closely tied to neuroscience.

Social work is another rewarding pathway. Many are exploring masters in social work online programs, which can open doors to roles in mental health, community outreach, and counseling.

Aspiring clinical psychologists should consider online accredited psyd programs—these doctorate-level paths are designed for those focused on clinical practice rather than research alone.

There's growing interest in marriage and family therapy (MFT), with options such as online mft programs helping students quickly qualify for therapy roles that draw upon neuroscience fundamentals in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Jamie L. Rhudy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles