World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
8455
World Ranking
8140
National Ranking
4368

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
8544
World Ranking
8002
National Ranking
3436

Jamie L. Rhudy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie L. Rhudy sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 217 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jamie L. Rhudy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie L. Rhudy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jamie L. Rhudy is affiliated with the University of Tulsa in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Pharmacology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The researcher focuses mainly on topics related to pain, with notable attention to musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pain mechanisms and treatments, and pain management including the placebo effect. Additional areas of interest include fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research, pediatric pain management techniques, opioid use disorder treatment, and studies involving anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Frequent venues for their publications include the Journal of Pain, where they have published extensively, as well as the Journal of Pain Research, Pain, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, and the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.

The following are some of their recent papers, showing a range of topics within pain research and associated cognitive and affective phenomena:

  • Examining Configural, Metric, and Scalar Invariance of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Native American and Non-Hispanic White Adults in the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP), 2020, Journal of Pain Research
  • The Relationship Between Adverse Life Events and Endogenous Inhibition of Pain and Spinal Nociception: Findings From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP), 2021, Journal of Pain
  • The Effect of Pain Catastrophizing on Endogenous Inhibition of Pain and Spinal Nociception in Native Americans: Results From the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk, 2020, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Heightened affective response to perturbation of respiratory but not pain signals in eating, mood, and anxiety disorders, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Emotion regulation and the salience network: a hypothetical integrative model of fibromyalgia, 2022, Nature Reviews Rheumatology

Jamie L. Rhudy often collaborates with a select group of coauthors, including Joanna O. Shadlow, Parker A. Kell, Felicitas A. Huber, Tyler A. Toledo, and Erin N. Street, with collaboration counts ranging from 15 to 33 publications per coauthor.

Best Publications

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • Fear and anxiety: divergent effects on human pain thresholds

    Jamie L Rhudy;Mary W Meagher

  • Pain and emotion: effects of affective picture modulation.

    Mary W. Meagher;Randolph C. Arnau;Jamie L. Rhudy

  • Longitudinal effects of hope on depression and anxiety: A latent variable analysis.

    Randolph C. Arnau;David H. Rosen;John F. Finch;Jamie L. Rhudy

  • Affective modulation of nociception at spinal and supraspinal levels

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Mary Anh Thù V. Nguyê˜n

  • Defining the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold in human participants: A comparison of different scoring criteria

    Jamie L. Rhudy

  • Psychological Risk Factors in Headache

    Robert A. Nicholson;Timothy T. Houle;Jamie L. Rhudy;Peter J. Norton

  • Emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON): Do affective valence and arousal play a role?

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Jennifer L. Russell

  • The role of emotion in pain modulation.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Mary W. Meagher

  • Negative affect: effects on an evaluative measure of human pain.

    Jamie L Rhudy;Mary W Meagher

  • Gender differences in pain: do emotions play a role?

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams

  • Emotional modulation of spinal nociception and pain: the impact of predictable noxious stimulation.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Philip L. Rambo

  • Emotion regulation and the salience network: a hypothetical integrative model of fibromyalgia

    Unknown

  • Increased anterior insula activity in anxious individuals is linked to diminished perceived control

    R P Alvarez;N Kirlic;M Misaki;J Bodurka

  • Characteristics of Chronic Nightmares in a Trauma-Exposed Treatment-Seeking Sample

    Joanne L. Davis;Patricia Byrd;Jamie L. Rhudy;David C. Wright

  • Noise stress and human pain thresholds: divergent effects in men and women.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Mary W. Meagher

  • Using normalized EMG to define the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold: further evaluation of standardized NFR scoring criteria.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Sarah McGlone

  • Partial Sleep Deprivation Attenuates the Positive Affective System: Effects Across Multiple Measurement Modalities.

    Patrick H. Finan;Phillip J. Quartana;Bethany Remeniuk;Eric L. Garland

  • Emotional modulation of pain and spinal nociception in fibromyalgia

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Jennifer L. DelVentura;Ellen L. Terry;Emily J. Bartley

  • Habituation, sensitization, and emotional valence modulation of pain responses.

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Emily J. Bartley;Amy E. Williams

  • Physiological Predictors of Response to Exposure, Relaxation, and Rescripting Therapy for Chronic Nightmares in a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Joanne L. Davis;Jamie L. Rhudy;Kristi E. Pruiksma;Patricia Byrd

  • Pain catastrophizing is related to temporal summation of pain but not temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Satin L. Martin;Ellen L. Terry

  • Do affective valence and arousal play a role

    Jamie L. Rhudy;Amy E. Williams;Klanci M. McCabe;Jennifer L. Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanne L. Davis
Joanne L. Davis University of Tulsa
Herman A. Taylor
Herman A. Taylor Morehouse School of Medicine
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Ole Kæseler Andersen
Ole Kæseler Andersen Aalborg University
Sahib S. Khalsa
Sahib S. Khalsa Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Peter J. Norton
Peter J. Norton Monash University
Eric L. Garland
Eric L. Garland University of Utah
Barbara E. Ainsworth
Barbara E. Ainsworth Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering Neuroscience, you may also be interested in related online degrees and career options within psychology, counseling, and social sciences. Online programs offer flexibility and accessibility for diverse learners looking to advance their education without pausing their careers.

For those looking for affordable academic options, cheap psychology degree online programs are available, helping students minimize student debt while pursuing a foundational discipline closely tied to neuroscience.

Social work is another rewarding pathway. Many are exploring masters in social work online programs, which can open doors to roles in mental health, community outreach, and counseling.

Aspiring clinical psychologists should consider online accredited psyd programs—these doctorate-level paths are designed for those focused on clinical practice rather than research alone.

There's growing interest in marriage and family therapy (MFT), with options such as online mft programs helping students quickly qualify for therapy roles that draw upon neuroscience fundamentals in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Jamie L. Rhudy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles