World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6485 6039 656 624 135 7034

Samuel J. Vine publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Samuel J. Vine between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Samuel J. Vine published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2022. 27 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2022. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 17 publications
2009 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Samuel J. Vine: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 3
2011 9
2012 7
2013 9
2014 7
2015 8
2016 5
2017 13
2018 14
2019 15
2020 15
2021 15
2022 18
2023 17
2024 10
2025 17
Total 184
Download as CSV

Samuel J. Vine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel J. Vine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Samuel J. Vine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel J. Vine sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Samuel J. Vine is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on psychology, neuroscience, and computer science. Key subfields include cognitive neuroscience, human-computer interaction, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work centers on several main topics, including virtual reality applications and impacts, sport psychology and performance, neural and behavioral psychology studies, human-automation interaction and safety, sports performance and training, motor control and adaptation, as well as visual perception and processing mechanisms.

Frequent co-authors collaborating on research projects include David Harris, Mark Wilson, Tom Arthur, Jonathan M. Bird, and Toby de Burgh. Their publications appear regularly in several academic venues, notably Virtual Reality, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, PLoS ONE, and the Journal of Eye Movement Research.

Their recent papers encompass applied research in virtual environments and sports psychology. These include:

  • A Framework for the Testing and Validation of Simulated Environments in Experimentation and Training (2020), Frontiers in Psychology
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Flow States and Performance (2021), International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Testing the Construct Validity of a Soccer-Specific Virtual Reality Simulator Using Novice, Academy, and Professional Soccer Players (2020), Virtual Reality
  • The Effect of a Virtual Reality Environment on Gaze Behaviour and Motor Skill Learning (2020), Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Exploring Sensorimotor Performance and User Experience Within a Virtual Reality Golf Putting Simulator (2020), Virtual Reality

Best Publications

  • The influence of anxiety on visual attentional control in basketball free throw shooting.

    Mark R. Wilson;Samuel J. Vine;Greg Wood

  • Anxiety, Attentional Control, and Performance Impairment in Penalty Kicks

    Mark R. Wilson;Greg Wood;Samuel J. Vine

  • Quiet eye training facilitates competitive putting performance in elite golfers.

    Samuel James Vine;Lee Moore;Mark R. Wilson

  • The effect of challenge and threat states on performance: an examination of potential mechanisms.

    Lee J Moore;Samuel J Vine;Mark R Wilson;Paul Freeman

  • The influence of quiet eye training and pressure on attention and visuo-motor control.

    Samuel J. Vine;Mark R. Wilson

  • Quiet eye training expedites motor learning and aids performance under heightened anxiety: The roles of response programming and external attention

    Lee J. Moore;Samuel J. Vine;Andrew Cooke;Christopher Ring

  • Quiet eye training: The acquisition, refinement and resilient performance of targeting skills

    Samuel J Vine;Lee J Moore;Mark R Wilson

  • Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts.

    Mark Wilson;John McGrath;Samuel Vine;James Brewer

  • Gaze training enhances laparoscopic technical skill acquisition and multi-tasking performance: a randomized, controlled study

    Mark R. Wilson;Samuel J. Vine;Elizabeth Bright;Rich S. W. Masters

  • Quiet Eye Training: Effects on Learning and Performance Under Pressure

    Samuel J. Vine;Mark R. Wilson

  • A framework for the testing and validation of simulated environments in experimentation and training

    David J Harris;Jonathan M Bird;Philip A Smart;Mark R Wilson

  • Champ or chump? Challenge and threat states during pressurized competition

    Lee J Moore;Mark R Wilson;Samuel J Vine;Adam H Coussens

  • Cheating experience: Guiding novices to adopt the gaze strategies of experts expedites the learning of technical laparoscopic skills

    Samuel J. Vine;Rich S.W. Masters;John S. McGrath;Elizabeth Bright

  • Individual reactions to stress predict performance during a critical aviation incident

    Samuel J. Vine;Liis Uiga;Aureliu Lavric;Lee J. Moore

  • Development and validation of a simulation workload measure: the simulation task load index (SIM-TLX)

    David J. Harris;Mark R. Wilson;Samuel J. Vine

  • Reappraising Threat: How to Optimize Performance Under Pressure.

    Lee J. Moore;Samuel J. Vine;Mark R. Wilson;Paul Freeman

  • Virtually the same? How impaired sensory information in virtual reality may disrupt vision for action.

    David J. Harris;Gavin Buckingham;Mark R. Wilson;Samuel J. Vine

  • Evaluating stress as a challenge is associated with superior attentional control and motor skill performance: testing the predictions of the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat.

    Samuel J. Vine;Paul Freeman;Lee J. Moore;Roy Chandra-Ramanan

  • Quiet Eye and Choking: Online Control Breaks Down at the Point of Performance Failure

    Samuel J. Vine;Don Lee;Lee J. Moore;Mark R. Wilson

  • Quiet eye training facilitates visuomotor coordination in children with developmental coordination disorder.

    CA Miles;G Wood;Samuel J. Vine;JN Vickers

  • Perceptual impairment and psychomotor control in virtual laparoscopic surgery

    Mark R. Wilson;John S. McGrath;Samuel J. Vine;James Brewer

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Wilson
Mark R. Wilson University of Wollongong
Rich S. W. Masters
Rich S. W. Masters University of Waikato
Joan N. Vickers
Joan N. Vickers University of Calgary
Michael W. Eysenck
Michael W. Eysenck Royal Holloway University of London
Mark Brosnan
Mark Brosnan University of Bath
Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
Christopher Ring
Christopher Ring University of Birmingham
John J. McGrath
John J. McGrath Aarhus University
Nazanin Derakshan
Nazanin Derakshan Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to various degree options and professional journeys. Many students begin with a bachelor’s degree in psychology before pursuing advanced degrees online, such as a master’s in counseling or clinical psychology. These programs are vital stepping stones for those aiming to become licensed therapists in the USA.

It’s important to understand that licensing requirements can differ based on location. For instance, the Raleigh licensed therapist education requirements emphasize state-specific exams and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, the Reno licensed therapist education requirements require applicants to meet Nevada board standards, including approved graduate coursework.

Meanwhile, individuals looking to practice in Virginia can learn more about the Richmond licensed therapist education requirements, which outline steps to obtain a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) credential. The licensed therapist requirements in Riverside focus on California’s unique licensing processes and regulations.

Choosing the right online degree can give you the flexibility and foundation needed for these rewarding career paths, while staying informed about local licensing ensures you meet all professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Samuel J. Vine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles