World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
13968
World Ranking
16962
National Ranking
478

Philip J. Larkin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Larkin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 141 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Philip J. Larkin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Larkin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. Larkin is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with a particular emphasis on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Surgery, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The main research topics covered by Philip J. Larkin include:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Family Support in Illness

Philip J. Larkin has contributed extensively to several publication venues, with the most frequent outlets being:

  • BMC Palliative Care
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • BMJ Open
  • International Journal of Palliative Nursing
  • Supportive Care in Cancer

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Philip J. Larkin include:

  • Care of the adult cancer patient at the end of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2021, ESMO Open
  • Equity and the financial costs of informal caregiving in palliative care: a critical debate, 2020, BMC Palliative Care
  • Nursing education on palliative care across Europe: Results and recommendations from the EAPC Taskforce on preparation for practice in palliative care nursing across the EU based on an online-survey and country reports, 2020, Palliative Medicine
  • MASCC multidisciplinary evidence-based recommendations for the management of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer, 2022, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Consensus definition of advance care planning in dementia: A 33-country Delphi study, 2023, Alzheimer s & Dementia

Frequent collaborators of Philip J. Larkin include Michael Connolly, Tomasz Dzierżanowski, Frank Spichiger, Andrea Luise Koppitz, and Gregory B. Crawford, reflecting a network of co-authors engaged in overlapping research areas.

Best Publications

  • Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement

    P. J. Larkin;W. R. Scowcroft

  • Purification and viability determinations of plant protoplasts.

    P. J. Larkin

  • Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in plants. Purification of legume leucoanthocyanidin reductase and molecular cloning of its cDNA.

    Gregory J. Tanner;Kathy T. Francki;Sharon Abrahams;John M. Watson

  • RNAi-mediated replacement of morphine with the nonnarcotic alkaloid reticuline in opium poppy.

    Robert S Allen;Anthony G Millgate;Julie A Chitty;Jennifer Thisleton

  • Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat

    P. J. Larkin;S. A. Ryan;R. I. S. Brettell;W. R. Scowcroft

  • pEmu: an improved promoter for gene expression in cereal cells

    R. I. S. Brettell;D. A. Chamberlain;A. M. Chaudhury

  • The Arabidopsis TDS4 gene encodes leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) and is essential for proanthocyanidin synthesis and vacuole development

    Sharon Abrahams;Elizabeth Lee;Amanda R. Walker;Gregory J. Tanner

  • Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research.

    Laura Dempsey;Maura Dowling;Philip Larkin;Kathy Murphy

  • Metabolic engineering of biomass for high energy density: oilseed-like triacylglycerol yields from plant leaves

    Thomas Vanhercke;Anna El Tahchy;Qing Liu;Xue-Rong Zhou

  • Identification and biochemical characterization of mutants in the proanthocyanidin pathway in Arabidopsis.

    Sharon Abrahams;Gregory J. Tanner;Philip J. Larkin;Anthony R. Ashton

  • The use of cell culture for subchromosomal introgressions of barley yellow dwarf virus resistance from Thinopyrum intermedium to wheat

    P. M. Banks;P. J. Larkin;H. S. Bariana;E. S. Lagudah

  • Somaclonal Variation and Crop Improvement

    Philip J. Larkin;William R. Scowcroft

  • Disomic Thinopyrum intermedium addition lines in wheat with barley yellow dwarf virus resistance and with rust resistances.

    P. J. Larkin;P. M. Banks;E. S. Lagudah;R. Appels

  • Increasing morphinan alkaloid production by over‐expressing codeinone reductase in transgenic Papaver somniferum

    Philip J. Larkin;James A. C. Miller;Robert S. Allen;Julie A. Chitty

  • Resistance to Wheat streak mosaic virus generated by expression of an artificial polycistronic microRNA in wheat

    Muhammad Fahim;Anthony A. Millar;Craig C. Wood;Philip J. Larkin

  • Analgesia: morphine-pathway block in top1 poppies.

    Anthony G Millgate;Barry J Pogson;Iain W Wilson;Toni M Kutchan

  • Metabolic engineering of morphinan alkaloids by over-expression and RNAi suppression of salutaridinol 7-O-acetyltransferase in opium poppy.

    Robert S. Allen;James A. C. Miller;Julie A. Chitty;Anthony J. Fist

  • Somacional variation and eyespot toxin tolerance in sugarcane

    P. J. Larkin;W. R. Scowcroft

  • From somatic variation to variant plants: mechanisms and applications

    P. J. Larkin;P. M. Banks;R. Bhati;R. I. S. Brettell

  • Transgenic white clover. Studies with the auxin-responsive promoter, GH3, in root gravitropism and lateral root development.

    P. J. Larkin;J. M. Gibson;U. Mathesius;J. J. Weinman

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Waterhouse
Peter M. Waterhouse Queensland University of Technology
Katherine M. White
Katherine M. White Queensland University of Technology
Harbans Bariana
Harbans Bariana Western Sydney University
Sheila Payne
Sheila Payne Lancaster University
Chun-Ming Liu
Chun-Ming Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Meixue Zhou
Meixue Zhou University of Tasmania
Barry G. Rolfe
Barry G. Rolfe Australian National University
Michael A. Djordjevic
Michael A. Djordjevic Australian National University
Rudi Appels
Rudi Appels University of Melbourne
Holger Meinke
Holger Meinke University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Biology and Biochemistry often explore careers in the health and medical fields. One popular option is medical coding, an in-demand career within healthcare administration. Understanding the medical coding jobs salary can help you decide if this path is right for you, as earnings vary based on certification and experience.

If you're wondering is medical coding a good job, it's important to weigh both the advantages (like job flexibility and remote work) and the challenges (including routine work and keeping up with evolving regulations).

For those looking to expand their qualifications, earning a health information management degree online can open more doors in data management and healthcare leadership. This path offers flexibility and affordability for working adults.

Alternatively, advancing your education through specialized graduate study is also possible. If you're considering nutrition or wellness sectors, you may want to research the cost of masters degree in nutrition to find programs that fit your budget and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Larkin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles