World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
8043
World Ranking
7365
National Ranking
3181

Ueli Rutishauser publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ueli Rutishauser sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 127 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ueli Rutishauser D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ueli Rutishauser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Troland Research Awards, United States National Academy of Sciences For his innovative experimental and computational studies to understand human perception and memory.

Overview

Ueli Rutishauser is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States and has conducted extensive research in neuroscience with a focus on human memory and brain function. Their research work spans cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's recent publications highlight several notable studies including:

  • Flexible recruitment of memory-based choice representations by the human medial frontal cortex, 2020, Science
  • Neurons detect cognitive boundaries to structure episodic memories in humans, 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • The geometry of domain-general performance monitoring in the human medial frontal cortex, 2022, Science
  • Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation, 2021, Neuron
  • The Architecture of Human Memory: Insights from Human Single-Neuron Recordings, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors include Adam N. Mamelak, Taufik A. Valiante, Chrystal M. Reed, Clayton P. Mosher, and Jeffrey M. Chung.

The scientist has contributed numerous articles to several publication venues with a strong presence in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neuron, Journal of Neuroscience, Scientific Data, and Cell Reports.

Main research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Recognition for their contributions includes the Troland Research Award from the United States National Academy of Sciences in 2014, awarded for innovative experimental and computational studies aimed at understanding human perception and memory.

Best Publications

  • Is bottom-up attention useful for object recognition?

    U. Rutishauser;D. Walther;C. Koch;P. Perona

  • Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase-locking of single neurons

    Ueli Rutishauser;Ian B. Ross;Adam N. Mamelak;Adam N. Mamelak;Erin M. Schuman;Erin M. Schuman

  • Online detection and sorting of extracellularly recorded action potentials in human medial temporal lobe recordings, in vivo☆

    Ueli Rutishauser;Erin M. Schuman;Adam N. Mamelak;Adam N. Mamelak

  • Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli

    Wolfgang Einhäuser;Wolfgang Einhäuser;Ueli Rutishauser;Christof Koch

  • Single-Trial Learning of Novel Stimuli by Individual Neurons of the Human Hippocampus-Amygdala Complex

    Ueli Rutishauser;Adam N. Mamelak;Adam N. Mamelak;Erin M. Schuman

  • Selective visual attention enables learning and recognition of multiple objects in cluttered scenes

    Dirk Walther;Ueli Rutishauser;Christof Koch;Pietro Perona

  • Persistently active neurons in human medial frontal and medial temporal lobe support working memory.

    Jan Kamiński;Shannon Sullivan;Jeffrey M Chung;Ian B Ross

  • Synthesizing cognition in neuromorphic electronic systems

    Emre Neftci;Jonathan Binas;Ueli Rutishauser;Elisabetta Chicca

  • Neurons in the human amygdala selective for perceived emotion

    Shuo Wang;Oana Tudusciuc;Adam N. Mamelak;Ian B. Ross

  • Neurons detect cognitive boundaries to structure episodic memories in humans

    Unknown

  • The human amygdala parametrically encodes the intensity of specific facial emotions and their categorical ambiguity.

    Shuo Wang;Rongjun Yu;Rongjun Yu;J. Michael Tyszka;Shanshan Zhen

  • Representation of retrieval confidence by single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe

    Ueli Rutishauser;Shengxuan Ye;Matthieu Koroma;Oana Tudusciuc

  • Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes

    Marnix Naber;Stefan Frässle;Ueli Rutishauser;Ueli Rutishauser;Wolfgang Einhäuser;Wolfgang Einhäuser

  • Flexible recruitment of memory-based choice representations by the human medial frontal cortex

    Juri Minxha;Juri Minxha;Juri Minxha;Ralph Adolphs;Stefano Fusi;Adam N. Mamelak

  • Single-unit responses selective for whole faces in the human amygdala.

    Ueli Rutishauser;Ueli Rutishauser;Oana Tudusciuc;Dirk Neumann;Adam N. Mamelak

  • The primate amygdala in social perception - insights from electrophysiological recordings and stimulation

    Ueli Rutishauser;Adam N. Mamelak;Ralph Adolphs

  • Activity of human hippocampal and amygdala neurons during retrieval of declarative memories

    Ueli Rutishauser;Erin M. Schuman;Adam N. Mamelak

  • Human Episodic Memory Retrieval Is Accompanied by a Neural Contiguity Effect.

    Sarah Folkerts;Ueli Rutishauser;Marc W. Howard

  • Probabilistic modeling of eye movement data during conjunction search via feature-based attention.

    Ueli Rutishauser;Christof Koch

  • Single-Neuron Correlates of Error Monitoring and Post-Error Adjustments in Human Medial Frontal Cortex.

    Zhongzheng Fu;Zhongzheng Fu;Daw-An J. Wu;Ian Ross;Jeffrey M. Chung

  • On the usefulness of attention for object recognition

    Dirk Walther;Ueli Rutishauser;Christof Koch;Pietro Perona

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Adolphs
Ralph Adolphs California Institute of Technology
Christof Koch
Christof Koch Allen Institute for Brain Science
Erin M. Schuman
Erin M. Schuman Max Planck Society
Paul F. M. J. Verschure
Paul F. M. J. Verschure Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Tobi Delbruck
Tobi Delbruck ETH Zurich
Suneil K. Kalia
Suneil K. Kalia University of Toronto
Marc W. Howard
Marc W. Howard Boston University
Gabriel Kreiman
Gabriel Kreiman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens the door to multiple exciting career paths, including research, healthcare, and technology sectors. As you explore your options, it's worth considering how your academic background can maximize your earning potential. For instance, reviewing which degrees make the most money is a smart way to guide your future course selections and long-term planning.

Flexibility is key for many learners. If you’re seeking affordable and convenient education, check out these online colleges that offer financial aid. Completing your degree or certification online can help reduce costs and accommodate work or family commitments.

If you’re interested in building skills quickly, consider enrolling in online certification courses related to neuroscience or allied fields. These programs can enhance your resume and provide immediate workplace value.

Finally, if you're looking for less intensive academic options that can still lead to rewarding careers, you may want to learn about what is the easiest degree to get online. This approach can provide a foundational start before pursuing more advanced study in neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Ueli Rutishauser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles