World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lennart Verhagen

Lennart Verhagen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
5427
World Ranking
8367
National Ranking
224

Lennart Verhagen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart Verhagen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 77 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lennart Verhagen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lennart Verhagen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lennart Verhagen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research spans several interrelated fields focused on brain function and biomedical engineering.

The main fields of study for Lennart Verhagen include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Engineering
  • Medicine

Within these areas, their work touches on specific subfields such as:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The core topics of research include:

  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lennart Verhagen highlight developments in brain stimulation and neural mechanisms. Key publications include:

  • "Transcranial focused ultrasound-mediated neurochemical and functional connectivity changes in deep cortical regions in humans" (2023), published in Nature Communications
  • "Activation and disruption of a neural mechanism for novel choice in monkeys" (2021), published in Nature
  • "Longitudinal connections and the organization of the temporal cortex in macaques, great apes, and humans" (2020), published in PLoS Biology
  • "ITRUSST consensus on standardised reporting for transcranial ultrasound stimulation" (2024), published in Brain Stimulation
  • "Ultrasound modulation of macaque prefrontal cortex selectively alters credit assignment-related activity and behavior" (2021), published in Science Advances

Lennart Verhagen frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Matthew F. S. Rushworth
  • Benjamin R. Kop
  • Charlotte J. Stagg
  • Jérôme Sallet
  • Elsa Fouragnan

Their publications often appear in specific scientific venues known for neuroscience and brain stimulation research. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Brain Stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • The rubber hand illusion in action

    M.P.M. Kammers;F. de Vignemont;L. Verhagen;L. Verhagen;H.C. Dijkerman

  • Manipulation of subcortical and deep cortical activity in the primate brain using transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation

    Davide Folloni;Davide Folloni;Lennart Verhagen;Lennart Verhagen;Rogier B. Mars;Rogier B. Mars;Elsa Fouragnan;Elsa Fouragnan

  • Offline impact of transcranial focused ultrasound on cortical activation in primates.

    Lennart Verhagen;Cécile Gallea;Davide Folloni;Davide Folloni;Charlotte Constans

  • Parieto-Frontal Connectivity during Visually Guided Grasping

    M.J. Grol;M.J. Grol;J. Majdandzic;K.E. Stephan;L. Verhagen

  • Endogenous Testosterone Modulates Prefrontal–Amygdala Connectivity during Social Emotional Behavior

    Inge Volman;Ivan Toni;Lennart Verhagen;Lennart Verhagen;Karin Roelofs;Karin Roelofs

  • The macaque anterior cingulate cortex translates counterfactual choice value into actual behavioral change

    Elsa F. Fouragnan;Elsa F. Fouragnan;Bolton K.H. Chau;Bolton K.H. Chau;Davide Folloni;Nils Kolling

  • Whole brain comparative anatomy using connectivity blueprints.

    Rogier B Mars;Rogier B Mars;Stamatios N Sotiropoulos;Stamatios N Sotiropoulos;Richard E Passingham;Jerome Sallet

  • Anterior prefrontal cortex inhibition impairs control over social emotional actions

    Inge Volman;Inge Volman;Karin Roelofs;Karin Roelofs;Saskia Koch;Lennart Verhagen

  • Is this hand for real? attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule

    Marjolein P. M. Kammers;Lennart Verhagen;H. Chris Dijkerman;Hinze Hogendoorn

  • Conceptual Alignment: How Brains Achieve Mutual Understanding

    Arjen Stolk;Lennart Verhagen;Ivan Toni

  • Comparing brains by matching connectivity profiles.

    Rogier B Mars;Rogier B Mars;Lennart Verhagen;Thomas Edward Gladwin;Franz-Xaver Neubert

  • Perceptuo-Motor Interactions during Prehension Movements

    L. Verhagen;H.C. Dijkerman;M.J. Grol;I. Toni

  • What is special about the human arcuate fasciculus? Lateralization, projections, and expansion

    Nicole Eichert;Lennart Verhagen;Davide Folloni;Saad Jbabdi

  • Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning

    Arjen Stolk;Matthijs L. Noordzij;Lennaert Verhagen;Inge Volman

  • The Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex: Sulcal Morphology and Its Influence on Functional Organization.

    Alizée Lopez-Persem;Lennart Verhagen;Céline Amiez;Michael Petrides

  • Activation and disruption of a neural mechanism for novel choice in monkeys.

    Alessandro Bongioanni;Davide Folloni;Lennart Verhagen;Lennart Verhagen;Jérôme Sallet;Jérôme Sallet

  • The extreme capsule fiber complex in humans and macaque monkeys: a comparative diffusion MRI tractography study.

    Rogier B. Mars;Rogier B. Mars;Sean Foxley;Lennart Verhagen;Saad Jbabdi

  • Dichotomous organization of amygdala/temporal-prefrontal bundles in both humans and monkeys.

    Davide Folloni;Davide Folloni;Jerome Sallet;Jerome Sallet;Alexandre A Khrapitchev;Nicola Sibson

  • Longitudinal connections and the organization of the temporal cortex in macaques, great apes, and humans

    Lea Roumazeilles;Nicole Eichert;Katherine L. Bryant;Davide Folloni;Davide Folloni

  • A Basal Forebrain-Cingulate Circuit in Macaques Decides It Is Time to Act.

    Nima Khalighinejad;Alessandro Bongioanni;Lennart Verhagen;Lennart Verhagen;Davide Folloni

  • Simultaneous representation of a spectrum of dynamically changing value estimates during decision making.

    D Meder;D Meder;N Kolling;N Kolling;L Verhagen;M K Wittmann;M K Wittmann

  • Conceptual Alignment: How Brains Achieve Mutual

    Understanding Stolk;Lennart Verhagen;Ivan Toni

Frequent Co-Authors

Rogier B. Mars
Rogier B. Mars University of Oxford
Jerome Sallet
Jerome Sallet University of Oxford
Matthew F. S. Rushworth
Matthew F. S. Rushworth University of Oxford
Ivan Toni
Ivan Toni Radboud University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Saad Jbabdi
Saad Jbabdi University of Oxford
Nicola R. Sibson
Nicola R. Sibson University of Oxford
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lennart Verhagen

Trending Scientists