World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15185 14284 7661 7086 432 24040

Haesook T. Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Haesook T. Kim between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Haesook T. Kim published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2024. 86 of the 539 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2024. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 50 publications 2024: 67 publications 2025: 19 publications
1996 2025

539 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Haesook T. Kim: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 4
2003 3
2004 21
2005 21
2006 18
2007 12
2008 18
2009 19
2010 23
2011 23
2012 23
2013 26
2014 27
2015 22
2016 22
2017 26
2018 15
2019 22
2020 13
2021 23
2022 21
2023 50
2024 67
2025 19
Total 539
Download as CSV

Haesook T. Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haesook T. Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 432 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 432
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Haesook T. Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haesook T. Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Haesook T. Kim is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine with a focus on hematology and related disciplines. Their research portfolio encompasses a broad array of topics, primarily centered on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and acute myeloid leukemia, along with other hematologic malignancies and immune system functions.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Impaired T- and NK-cell reconstitution after haploidentical HCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, 2021, Blood Advances
  • A multicenter phase 1 study of nivolumab for relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic transplantation, 2020, Blood
  • Peripheral host T cells survive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and promote graft-versus-host disease, 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel agents, 2020, Blood Advances
  • Impact of diagnostic genetics on remission MRD and transplantation outcomes in older patients with AML, 2022, Blood

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Haesook T. Kim include:

  • Robert J. Soiffer
  • Corey Cutler
  • Jerome Ritz
  • Vincent T. Ho
  • Joseph H. Antin

The scientist has published extensively in several key journals, notably:

  • Blood
  • Blood Advances
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Haematologica
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation

Their main field of study is medicine, with a more focused contribution in subfields such as:

  • Hematology
  • Immunology
  • Genetics
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

The core research topics covered by Haesook T. Kim include:

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • CAR-T cell therapy research

Best Publications

  • Interleukin-2 and Regulatory T Cells in Graft-versus-Host Disease

    John Koreth;Ken Ichi Matsuoka;Haesook T. Kim;Sean M. McDonough

  • IL-2 regulates FOXP3 expression in human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells through a STAT-dependent mechanism and induces the expansion of these cells in vivo

    Emmanuel Zorn;Erik A. Nelson;Mehrdad Mohseni;Fabrice Porcheray

  • Validation and refinement of the Disease Risk Index for allogeneic stem cell transplantation

    Philippe Armand;Haesook T. Kim;Brent R. Logan;Zhiwei Wang

  • Ipilimumab for Patients with Relapse after Allogeneic Transplantation

    Matthew S. Davids;Haesook T. Kim;Pavan Bachireddy;Caitlin Costello

  • Cumulative Incidence in Competing Risks Data and Competing Risks Regression Analysis

    Haesook T. Kim

  • Reduced frequency of FOXP3+ CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease.

    Emmanuel Zorn;Haesook T. Kim;Haesook T. Kim;Stephanie J. Lee;Stephanie J. Lee;Blair H. Floyd;Blair H. Floyd

  • Antibody responses to H-Y minor histocompatibility antigens correlate with chronic graft-versus-host disease and disease remission

    David B. Miklos;David B. Miklos;Haesook T. Kim;Haesook T. Kim;Katherine H. Miller;Katherine H. Miller;Luxuan Guo;Luxuan Guo

  • Prognostic impact of elevated pretransplantation serum ferritin in patients undergoing myeloablative stem cell transplantation

    Philippe Armand;Haesook T. Kim;Corey S. Cutler;Vincent T. Ho

  • Low-Dose Interleukin-2 Therapy Restores Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

    Ken-ichi Matsuoka;John Koreth;Haesook T. Kim;O. Gregory Bascug

  • Rituximab for steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease.

    Corey Cutler;David Miklos;Haesook T. Kim;Nathaniel Treister

  • A disease risk index for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

    Philippe Armand;Christopher J. Gibson;Corey Cutler;Vincent T. Ho

  • Comparative outcome of nonmyeloablative and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age.

    Edwin P Alyea;Edwin P Alyea;Haesook T Kim;Haesook T Kim;Vincent T Ho;Vincent T Ho;Corey Cutler;Corey Cutler

  • Altered B-cell homeostasis and excess BAFF in human chronic graft-versus-host disease.

    Stefanie Sarantopoulos;Kristen E. Stevenson;Haesook T. Kim;Corey S. Cutler

  • Prostaglandin-modulated umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

    Corey Cutler;Pratik Multani;David Robbins;Haesook T. Kim

  • Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Clinical Trial of Anti-T-Lymphocyte Globulin to Assess Impact on Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Free Survival in Patients Undergoing HLA-Matched Unrelated Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

    Robert J. Soiffer;Haesook T. Kim;Joseph McGuirk;Mitchell E. Horwitz

  • The clinical spectrum of adult acute myeloid leukaemia associated with core binding factor translocations

    Frederick R. Appelbaum;Kenneth J. Kopecky;Martin S. Tallman;Marilyn L. Slovak

  • Idelalisib given front-line for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia causes frequent immune-mediated hepatotoxicity

    Benjamin L. Lampson;Siddha N. Kasar;Tiago R. Matos;Elizabeth A. Morgan

  • High levels of B-cell activating factor in patients with active chronic graft-versus-host disease.

    Stefanie Sarantopoulos;Kristen E. Stevenson;Haesook T. Kim;Nazmim S. Bhuiya

  • Quality of life associated with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

    S J Lee;H T Kim;V T Ho;C Cutler

  • Altered regulatory T cell homeostasis in patients with CD4+ lymphopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Ken Ichi Matsuoka;Haesook T. Kim;Sean McDonough;Gregory Bascug

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Soiffer
Robert J. Soiffer Harvard University
Joseph H. Antin
Joseph H. Antin Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Corey Cutler
Corey Cutler Harvard University
Vincent T. Ho
Vincent T. Ho Harvard University
Edwin P. Alyea
Edwin P. Alyea Harvard University
Jerome Ritz
Jerome Ritz Harvard University
John Koreth
John Koreth Harvard University
Philippe Armand
Philippe Armand Harvard University
Jennifer R. Brown
Jennifer R. Brown Harvard University
Catherine J. Wu
Catherine J. Wu Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school, a variety of flexible online pathways are available. Many choose advanced nursing degrees, such as online DNP programs that prepare graduates for leadership and clinical roles. Some prospective students may prefer easy DNP programs for a more accessible route to earning a doctorate in nursing practice, making it possible to balance study with work or family responsibilities.

Fast-track nursing options are also popular. If you're looking for a quick entry into the field, accelerated LPN programs allow students to become Licensed Practical Nurses in less time, helping address the ongoing demand for nursing professionals. For those with a special interest in mental health, psych NP programs offer a targeted path to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner through efficient and flexible online study.

Each of these alternatives provides unique opportunities for career growth and advancement in healthcare, making them valuable options to consider alongside traditional medicine degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Haesook T. Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles