World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan G. J. van de Winkel

Jan G. J. van de Winkel

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
91
Citations
28123
World Ranking
1046
National Ranking
565

Jan G. J. van de Winkel publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan G. J. van de Winkel sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 260 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Jan G. J. van de Winkel D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan G. J. van de Winkel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan G. J. van de Winkel is affiliated with Genmab in the United States. Their professional focus is reflected through their association with this organization, which is known for its work in biotechnology and pharmaceutical research.

There are no records of recent publications, co-authors, or specific fields and subfields of study associated with Jan G. J. van de Winkel in the available data. Similarly, there are no listed awards or book publications attributed to this scientist in the current dataset.

The absence of data on main topics of work, frequent publication venues, or notable collaborations limits the detailed analysis of their research focus and academic impact. However, the connection to Genmab indicates involvement in applied biomedical research or related scientific endeavors.

The profile is based solely on the verified affiliation information, providing a factual representation without assumptions about the scope or nature of their research activities.

Best Publications

  • Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors

    Michel De Weers;Yu Tzu Tai;Michael S. Van Der Veer;Joost M. Bakker

  • Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Human IgG4 Antibodies by Dynamic Fab Arm Exchange

    Marijn van der Neut Kolfschoten;Janine Schuurman;Mario Losen;Wim K. Bleeker

  • Human IgG Fc receptor heterogeneity: molecular aspects and clinical implications.

    Jan G.J. van de Winkel;Peter J.A. Capel

  • Complement is activated by IgG hexamers assembled at the cell surface.

    Christoph A. Diebolder;Christoph A. Diebolder;Frank J. Beurskens;Rob N. de Jong;Roman I. Koning

  • Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphomas

    Jessica L Teeling;Ruth R French;Mark S Cragg;Jeroen van den Brakel

  • The Biological Activity of Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies Is Linked to Unique Epitopes on CD20

    Jessica L. Teeling;Wendy J.M. Mackus;Luus J.J.M. Wiegman;Jeroen H.N. van den Brakel

  • Human monoclonal antibodies against cd20

    Jessica Woodmill Cottage Teeling;Sigrid Ruuls;Martin Glennie;Jan G. J. Van De Winkel

  • Impaired IgG-Dependent Anaphylaxis and Arthus Reaction in FcγRIII (CD16) Deficient Mice

    Wouter L.W Hazenbos;J.Engelbert Gessner;Frans M.A Hofhuis;Henri Kuipers

  • Effector Function Activities of a Panel of Mutants of a Broadly Neutralizing Antibody against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

    Marjan Hezareh;Ann J. Hessell;Richard C. Jensen;Jan G. J. van de Winkel

  • On the interaction of IgG subclasses with the low affinity Fc gamma RIIa (CD32) on human monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets. Analysis of a functional polymorphism to human IgG2.

    P. W. H. I. Parren;P. A. M. Warmerdam;L. C. M. Boeije;J. Arts

  • Therapeutic IgG4 antibodies engage in Fab-arm exchange with endogenous human IgG4 in vivo

    Aran F Labrijn;Antonio Ortiz Buijsse;Ewald T J van den Bremer;Annemiek Y W Verwilligen

  • Fc gamma receptor gene polymorphisms in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus - Contribution of FCGR2B to genetic susceptibility

    Chieko Kyogoku;Hilde M. Dijstelbloem;Naoyuki Tsuchiya;Yoko Hatta

  • IgA and the IgA Fc receptor.

    Marjolein van Egmond;Cora A Damen;Annemiek B van Spriel;Gestur Vidarsson

  • Efficient generation of stable bispecific IgG1 by controlled Fab-arm exchange

    Aran F. Labrijn;Joyce I. Meesters;Bart E. C. G. de Goeij;Ewald T. J. van den Bremer

  • Targeting interleukin‐15 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A proof‐of‐concept study

    Bo Baslund;Niels Tvede;Bente Danneskiold-Samsoe;Per Larsson

  • Heterodimeric antibody fc-containing proteins and methods for production thereof

    Aran Frank Labrijn;Joyce I. Meesters;Ewald T. J. Van Den Bremer;Joost J. Neijssen

  • Binding of submaximal C1q promotes complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) of B cells opsonized with anti-CD20 mAbs ofatumumab (OFA) or rituximab (RTX): considerably higher levels of CDC are induced by OFA than by RTX.

    Andrew W. Pawluczkowycz;Frank J. Beurskens;Paul V. Beum;Margaret A. Lindorfer

  • Clinical significance of IgG Fc receptors and FcγR-directed immunotherapies

    Yashwant M. Deo;Robert F. Graziano;Roland Repp;Jan G.J. van de Winkel

  • Recombinant monovalent antibodies and methods for production thereof

    Paul Parren;Janine Schuurman;Tom Vink;Willem Karel Bleeker

  • Human IgG2 Antibodies against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Effectively Trigger Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity but, in Contrast to IgG1, Only by Cells of Myeloid Lineage

    Tanja Schneider-Merck;Jeroen J. Lammerts van Bueren;Sven Berger;Kai Rossen

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul W. H. I. Parren
Paul W. H. I. Parren Leiden University Medical Center
Jeanette H. W. Leusen
Jeanette H. W. Leusen Utrecht University
Thomas Valerius
Thomas Valerius Kiel University
Ole Baadsgaard
Ole Baadsgaard Genmab (United States)
Matthias Peipp
Matthias Peipp Kiel University
Marjolein van Egmond
Marjolein van Egmond VU University Medical Center
Gestur Vidarsson
Gestur Vidarsson University of Amsterdam
Ronald P. Taylor
Ronald P. Taylor University of Virginia
Margaret A. Lindorfer
Margaret A. Lindorfer University of Virginia
Martin J. Glennie
Martin J. Glennie University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, exploring related healthcare degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs such as the fastest and easiest lpn programs offer a quick route into practical nursing, providing foundational patient care skills that complement immunological knowledge.

If you're aiming for advanced clinical roles, consider easy nurse practitioner programs to get into, which allow you to specialize and work closely with patients in immunology-related fields. These programs balance accessibility with rigorous training.

Mental health is a crucial aspect intertwined with immune function. Online pmhnp programs online with best clinical placement provide opportunities for hands-on experience, ensuring graduates are well-prepared for clinical environments focused on psychiatric care.

Budget-conscious students might explore affordable pmhnp programs that maintain quality education without the high price tag. Combining affordability and clinical experience creates a strong pathway into immunology-related mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jan G. J. van de Winkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles