World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eugene C. Freuder

Eugene C. Freuder

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
10582
World Ranking
7837
National Ranking
26

Eugene C. Freuder publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene C. Freuder sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 179 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eugene C. Freuder D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene C. Freuder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Member of the Royal Irish Academy
  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1995 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For fundamental and sustained contributions to the field of constraint-based reasoning.

Overview

Eugene C. Freuder is affiliated with University College Cork in Ireland. Their research spans several areas within computer science and medicine, focusing notably on constraint satisfaction and optimization, alongside topics related to bone health and cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Their published works include:

  • Classifier-based constraint acquisition, 2021, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
  • Conversational Modeling for Constraint Satisfaction, 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • PTHG21 Challenge, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Replaceability and a simple substitutability hierarchy for constraint satisfaction problems, 2025, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Helmut Simonis
  • Steven Prestwich
  • Barry O'Sullivan
  • David Browne
  • Richard J. Wallace

The main publication venues for their work are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence

Their scholarly output covers the following fields of study:

  • Computer Science
  • Medicine

Within these fields, notable subfields of research include:

  • Oncology
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Management Science and Operations Research

The main research topics addressed in their work are:

  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Speech and dialogue systems

Eugene C. Freuder has been recognized by multiple professional bodies, including:

  • Member of the Royal Irish Academy, 2007
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2005
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 1995, for fundamental and sustained contributions to the field of constraint-based reasoning

Best Publications

  • Partial constraint satisfaction

    Eugene C. Freuder;Richard J. Wallace

  • A Sufficient Condition for Backtrack-Free Search

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • The complexity of some polynomial network consistency algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems

    Alan K. Mackworth;Eugene C. Freuder

  • Synthesizing constraint expressions

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • Contradicting Conventional Wisdom in Constraint Satisfaction

    Daniel Sabin;Eugene C. Freuder

  • A sufficient condition for backtrack-bounded search

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • Eliminating interchangeable values in constraint satisfaction problems

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • Configuration as Composite Constraint Satisfaction

    Daniel Sabin;Eugene C. Freuder

  • Complexity of K-tree structured constraint satisfaction problems

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • Constraint Satisfaction

    Unknown

  • Taking advantage of stable sets of variables in constraint satisfaction problems

    Eugene C. Freuder;Michael J. Quinn

  • Using inference to reduce arc consistency computation

    Christian Bessiere;Eugene C. Freuder;Jean-Charles Regin

  • Partial constraint satisfaction

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • Constraint-based reasoning

    Eugene C. Freuder;Alan K. Mackworth

  • In Pursuit of the Holy Grail

    Eugene C. Freuder

  • The Adaptive Constraint Engine

    Susan L. Epstein;Eugene C. Freuder;Richard Wallace;Anton Morozov

  • Neighborhood inverse consistency preprocessing

    Eugene C. Freuder;Charles D. Elfe

  • On forward checking for non-binary constraint satisfaction

    Christian Bessière;Pedro Meseguer;Eugene C. Freuder;Javier Larrosa

  • Stable Solutions for Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems

    Richard J. Wallace;Eugene C. Freuder

  • Constraint Satisfaction: An Emerging Paradigm

    Eugene C. Freuder;Alan K. Mackworth

  • Using Constraint Metaknowledge to Reduce Arc Consistency Computation

    Unknown

  • Research Note On forward checking for non-binary constraint satisfaction ✩

    Christian Bessière;Pedro Meseguer;Eugene C. Freuder;Javier Larrosa

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan K. Mackworth
Alan K. Mackworth University of British Columbia
Christian Bessiere
Christian Bessiere University of Montpellier
J. Christopher Beck
J. Christopher Beck University of Toronto
Francesca Rossi
Francesca Rossi IBM (United States)
Boi Faltings
Boi Faltings École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Gerhard Friedrich
Gerhard Friedrich University of Klagenfurt
Sandip Sen
Sandip Sen University of Tulsa
Holly A. Yanco
Holly A. Yanco University of Massachusetts Lowell
Austin Tate
Austin Tate University of Edinburgh
Maja J. Matarić
Maja J. Matarić University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees offers flexible options for advancing your career in Computer Science and related fields. Many students start with an accelerated associates degree online to quickly build foundational skills and jumpstart their education.

Cost is a major factor. Selecting the cheapest online business management degree program can help reduce expenses while still providing essential business and tech knowledge that complements Computer Science.

Many online universities now offer bachelor’s programs with a wide range of specializations. This flexibility allows you to tailor your studies to specific technical or interdisciplinary interests.

If you’re interested in technical careers, consider online engineering degree programs. These programs provide rigorous training in problem-solving and innovation, opening doors to engineering and technology roles across industries.

By exploring these diverse online pathways, you can align your education with your career goals—often on your own schedule and at a lower cost.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene C. Freuder

Trending Scientists