World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
10667
World Ranking
6408
National Ranking
136

Thomas Schiex publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Schiex sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Schiex D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Schiex sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to the theory and algorithms of constraint-based reasoning and to their applications in computational biology.

Overview

Thomas Schiex is affiliated with INRAE, the Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement in France. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and computer science.

The main fields of study in Thomas Schiex's work include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Computer Science

They have contributed extensively to subfields such as molecular biology, genetics, computational theory and mathematics, ecology, and computer networks and communications.

Prominent research topics that characterize their publications include:

  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods

Thomas Schiex has a record of publications in a range of journals and venues with multiple papers appearing in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Other publication venues include the Journal of the American Chemical Society, PLoS Pathogens, and Protein Engineering Design and Selection.

Their recent papers include:

  • Protein Design with Deep Learning, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Seven Amino Acid Types Suffice to Create the Core Fold of RNA Polymerase, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • A Comparative Study to Decipher the Structural and Dynamics Determinants Underlying the Activity and Thermal Stability of GH-11 Xylanases, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Intracellular Salmonella Paratyphi A is motile and differs in the expression of flagella-chemotaxis, SPI-1 and carbon utilization pathways in comparison to intracellular S. Typhimurium, 2022, PLoS Pathogens
  • Molecular flexibility in computational protein design: an algorithmic perspective, 2021, Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Thomas Schiex often collaborates with a group of frequent co-authors, including Sophie Barbe, Simon de Givry, Jelena Vučinić, David Simoncini, and Manon Ruffini.

In 2020, they were recognized as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) for contributions to the theory and algorithms of constraint-based reasoning and their applications in computational biology.

Best Publications

  • Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita

    Pierre Abad;Pierre Abad;Jérôme Gouzy;Jean-Marc Aury;Jean-Marc Aury;Philippe Castagnone-Sereno;Philippe Castagnone-Sereno

  • Valued constraint satisfaction problems: hard and easy problems

    Thomas Schiex;Helene Fargier;Gerard Verfaillie

  • Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses

    Catherine Mathé;Marie‐France Sagot;Thomas Schiex;Pierre Rouzé

  • Carhta Gene: multipopulation integrated genetic and radiation hybrid mapping

    Simon De Givry;Martin Bouchez;Patrick Chabrier;Denis Milan

  • NOGOOD RECORDING FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS

    Thomas Schiex;Gérard Verfaillie

  • Semiring-Based CSPs and Valued CSPs: Frameworks, Properties,and Comparison

    S. Bistarelli;U. Montanari;F. Rossi;T. Schiex

  • Radio Link Frequency Assignment

    B. Cabon;S. de Givry;L. Lobjois;T. Schiex

  • Solution reuse in dynamic constraint satisfaction problems

    Gerard Verfaillie;Thomas Schiex

  • Solving weighted CSP by maintaining arc consistency

    Javier Larrosa;Thomas Schiex

  • Exploring root symbiotic programs in the model legume Medicago truncatula using EST analysis.

    Etienne‐Pascal Journet;Diederik van Tuinen;Jérome Gouzy;Hervé Crespeau

  • Russian doll search for solving constraint optimization problems

    Gérard Verfaillie;Michel Lemaître;Thomas Schiex

  • Possibilistic constraint satisfaction problems or How to handle soft constraints

    Thomas Schiex

  • Arc consistency for soft constraints

    Martin Cooper;Thomas Schiex

  • In the quest of the best form of local consistency for weighted CSP

    Javier Larrosa;Thomas Schiex

  • Soft arc consistency revisited

    M. C. Cooper;S. de Givry;M. Sanchez;T. Schiex

  • Selecting preferred solutions in Fuzzy Constraint Satisfaction Problems

    H. Fargier;J. Lang;T. Schiex

  • CARTHAGENE: Constructing and Joining Maximum Likelihood Genetic Maps

    Thomas Schiex;Christine Gaspin

  • Mixed constraint satisfaction: a framework for decision problems under incomplete knowledge

    Hélène Fargier;Jérôme Lang;Thomas Schiex

  • Maintaining reversible DAC for Max-CSP

    Javier Larrosa;Pedro Meseguer;Thomas Schiex

  • EUGÈNE: An Eukaryotic Gene Finder That Combines Several Sources of Evidence

    Thomas Schiex;Annick Moisan;Pierre Rouzé

Frequent Co-Authors

Jérôme Gouzy
Jérôme Gouzy Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Patrick Wincker
Patrick Wincker University of Paris-Saclay
Jérôme Lang
Jérôme Lang Paris Dauphine University
Jean-Marc Aury
Jean-Marc Aury University of Paris-Saclay
Julie Poulain
Julie Poulain French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Stephane Rombauts
Stephane Rombauts Ghent University
Jérôme Salse
Jérôme Salse INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Dominique Brunel
Dominique Brunel INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Rod A. Wing
Rod A. Wing University of Arizona
Yves Van de Peer
Yves Van de Peer Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of connected online degrees and lucrative career options. If you’re considering broadening your expertise, programs like an online physics bachelor's degree or an online electrical engineering degree ranking can complement a computer science background, especially for students interested in engineering or applied sciences.

Students can also look into the field of data analytics by choosing a data scientist degree. The demand for data professionals is rapidly growing, making it a top pathway for job stability and advancement.

Not every student needs a traditional four-year degree to launch a tech career. There are several quick certifications that pay well, offering affordable, accelerated entry into fields like software development, network security, and IT support.

Choosing the right online program or certification depends on your career goals, interests, and budget—so consider all your options when mapping out your academic and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Schiex

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles