World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 120 65 62 18 16 362 69950
Genetics 122 343 331 178 171 362 70748

Rod A. Wing publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rod A. Wing between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rod A. Wing published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 23 of the 422 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 2 publications
1985 2026

422 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rod A. Wing: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 2
1994 6
1995 6
1996 7
1997 7
1998 4
1999 6
2000 14
2001 20
2002 16
2003 6
2004 17
2005 17
2006 17
2007 20
2008 16
2009 17
2010 21
2011 15
2012 9
2013 20
2014 8
2015 12
2016 12
2017 13
2018 9
2019 11
2020 13
2021 10
2022 17
2023 15
2024 8
2025 21
2026 2
Total 422
Download as CSV

Rod A. Wing publications per year - data summary

  • Rod A. Wing, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from University of Arizona, has 422 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2010 and 2025, with 21 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1988 and 1990, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 42 years in the span carry no publications at all (1986, 1987 and 1992).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.8 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 63 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1998: 40 publications (2.9 per year); 1999-2012: 211 publications (15.1 per year); 2013-2026: 171 publications (12.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Rod A. Wing publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod A. Wing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–365 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 362 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12 362
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Rod A. Wing publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 88 ranges running from 36–40 to 467+ publications.
  • Rod A. Wing, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from University of Arizona, records 362 publications - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than Rod A. Wing, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 136–140 publications range, and Rod A. Wing ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 111–115 publications, holding 255 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 55% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 141–145 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 467 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Rod A. Wing D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod A. Wing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 109+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99 120
Download as CSV

Rod A. Wing D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 80 ranges running from 30 to 109+ D-Index.
  • Rod A. Wing, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from University of Arizona, records 120 D-Index - the 99th percentile of the discipline.
  • 99% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than Rod A. Wing, and about 1% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Rod A. Wing ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 288 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 66% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in United States Leader Award
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Rod A. Wing is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and has an extensive body of research primarily within Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields, notably Plant Science, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

Their research topics include:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • GABA and Rice Research
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics

Rod A. Wing has published several recent papers contributing to the understanding of plant genomics and genetics. Selected works include:

  • "A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice," 2021, published in Cell
  • "Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice," 2021, published in Molecular Plant
  • "Genomic mechanisms of climate adaptation in polyploid bioenergy switchgrass," 2021, published in Nature
  • "A platinum standard pan-genome resource that represents the population structure of Asian rice," 2020, published in Scientific Data
  • "Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning," 2022, published in Nature Genetics

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jianwei Zhang
  • Andrea Zuccolo
  • Yong Zhou
  • Dmytro Chebotarov
  • Nahed Mohammed

Key publication venues where Rod A. Wing often publishes are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Data
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Communications
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics

Rod A. Wing was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2010.

Best Publications

  • The map-based sequence of the rice genome

    Takashi Matsumoto;Jianzhong Wu;Hiroyuki Kanamori;Yuichi Katayose

  • Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean

    Jeremy Schmutz;Steven B. Cannon;Jessica Schlueter;Jessica Schlueter;Jianxin Ma

  • The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity, and Dynamics

    Patrick S. Schnable;Doreen Ware;Robert S. Fulton;Joshua C. Stein

  • A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica)

    Stephen A. Goff;Darrell Ricke;Tien-Hung Lan;Gernot Presting

  • The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution

    Shusei Sato;Satoshi Tabata;Hideki Hirakawa;Erika Asamizu

  • Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.

    Andrew G. Clark;Michael B. Eisen;Michael B. Eisen;Douglas R. Smith;Casey M. Bergman

  • Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass

    Husen Zhang;John K. DiBaise;Andrea Zuccolo;Dave Kudrna

  • Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice

    Wensheng Wang;Ramil Mauleon;Zhiqiang Hu;Dmytro Chebotarov

  • A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome

    Klaus F.X. Mayer;Robbie Waugh;Peter Langridge;Timothy J. Close

  • A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications

    Jeremy Schmutz;Phillip E McClean;Sujan Mamidi;G Albert Wu

  • The genome of Theobroma cacao

    Xavier Argout;Jerome Salse;Jean-Marc Aury;Jean-Marc Aury;Jean-Marc Aury;Mark J Guiltinan

  • The Ashbya gossypii Genome as a Tool for Mapping the Ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome

    Fred S. Dietrich;Fred S. Dietrich;Sylvia Voegeli;Sophie Brachat;Anita Lerch

  • Doubling genome size without polyploidization: dynamics of retrotransposition-driven genomic expansions in Oryza australiensis, a wild relative of rice.

    Benoit Piegu;Romain Guyot;Nathalie Picault;Anne Roulin

  • Oil palm genome sequence reveals divergence of interfertile species in Old and New worlds

    Rajinder Singh;Meilina Ong-Abdullah;Eng Ti Leslie Low;Mohamad Arif Abdul Manaf

  • An integrated physical and genetic map of the rice genome

    Mingsheng Chen;Gernot Presting;W. Brad Barbazuk;Jose Luis Goicoechea

  • Construction and characterization of bacterial artificial chromosome library of Sorghum bicolor

    Sung sick Woo;Jiming Jiang;Jiming Jiang;Bikram S. Gill;Andrew H. Paterson

  • Genomes of 13 domesticated and wild rice relatives highlight genetic conservation, turnover and innovation across the genus Oryza

    Joshua C. Stein;Yeisoo Yu;Dario Copetti;Dario Copetti;Derrick J. Zwickl

  • Isolation of molecular markers from specific chromosomal intervals using DNA pools from existing mapping populations

    James J. Giovannoni;Rod A. Wing;Martin W. Ganal;Steven D. Tanksley

  • Evolution of plant genome architecture

    Jonathan F. Wendel;Scott A. Jackson;Blake C. Meyers;Blake C. Meyers;Rod A. Wing

  • Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium

    Jennifer S. Hawkins;Hye Ran Kim;John D. Nason;Rod A. Wing

  • A 3347-Locus Genetic Recombination Map of Sequence-Tagged Sites Reveals Features of Genome Organization, Transmission and Evolution of Cotton (Gossypium)

    Junkang Rong;Colette Abbey;John E. Bowers;Curt L. Brubaker

  • Doubling genome size without polyploidization: dynamics of retrotransposition-driven genomic expansions in Oryza australiensis, a wild relative of rice (Genome Research (2006) 16, (1262-1269))

    Benoit Piegu;Romain Guyot;Nathalie Picault;Anne Roulin

Frequent Co-Authors

Yeisoo Yu
Yeisoo Yu University of Arizona
Scott A. Jackson
Scott A. Jackson University of Georgia
David A Kudrna
David A Kudrna University of Arizona
Andrew H. Paterson
Andrew H. Paterson University of Georgia
Doreen Ware
Doreen Ware Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Carol Soderlund
Carol Soderlund University of Arizona
Jiming Jiang
Jiming Jiang Michigan State University
Ralph A. Dean
Ralph A. Dean North Carolina State University
Tae-Jin Yang
Tae-Jin Yang Seoul National University
Jeremy Schmutz
Jeremy Schmutz Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open doors to many other impactful fields in healthcare and science. Many students choose genetics as a stepping stone toward broader or related careers. For those interested in patient care, considering a nursing school without teas can make nursing education more accessible and reduce exam barriers.

If you’re interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing affordable mha online programs could provide key administration skills and position you well in medical management roles. Students aiming for direct, hands-on experience may benefit from fast track medical lpn options, allowing a quicker pathway to working with patients and gaining valuable clinical exposure.

Finally, for those seeking advanced expertise, online phd nursing programs offer flexible opportunities to become a leader in research, teaching, or policy. Exploring these related programs can complement a strong foundation in genetics and help you build a uniquely versatile healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Rod A. Wing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles