World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6826
World Ranking
8290
National Ranking
3554

Jack J. Lin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack J. Lin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jack J. Lin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack J. Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack J. Lin is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, psychiatry and mental health, and neurology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of neural dynamics and brain function, memory and neural mechanisms, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, functional brain connectivity studies, and epilepsy research and treatment.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jack J. Lin include:

  • An electrophysiological marker of arousal level in humans, 2020, eLife
  • Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions, 2021, Neuron
  • A consensus statement on detection of hippocampal sharp wave ripples and differentiation from other fast oscillations, 2022, Nature Communications
  • A taxonomy of seizure dynamotypes, 2020, eLife
  • Coupling between slow waves and sharp-wave ripples engages distributed neural activity during sleep in humans, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Jack J. Lin frequently publishes in several scientific venues. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Cerebral Cortex, Journal of the Endocrine Society, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Their collaborations span a range of researchers, with frequent co-authors being Robert T. Knight, David King-Stephens, Kenneth D. Laxer, Peter B. Weber, and Ignacio Sáez.

Best Publications

  • The neurobiology of cognitive disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Brian Bell;Jack J. Lin;Michael Seidenberg;Bruce Hermann

  • Uncovering the neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan

    Jack J Lin;Marco Mula;Bruce P Hermann

  • Neural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic.

    Randolph F. Helfrich;Randolph F. Helfrich;Ian C. Fiebelkorn;Sara M. Szczepanski;Jack J. Lin

  • An electrophysiological marker of arousal level in humans.

    Janna D Lendner;Janna D Lendner;Randolph F Helfrich;Bryce A Mander;Luis Romundstad

  • Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

    Anaïs Llorens;Athina Tzovara;Athina Tzovara;Ludovic Bellier;Ilina Bhaya-Grossman

  • Reduced Neocortical Thickness and Complexity Mapped in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy with Hippocampal Sclerosis

    Jack J. Lin;Noriko Salamon;Agatha D. Lee;Rebecca A. Dutton

  • Bidirectional prefrontal-hippocampal dynamics organize information transfer during sleep in humans.

    Randolph F. Helfrich;Janna D. Lendner;Janna D. Lendner;Bryce A. Mander;Heriberto Guillen

  • Direct brain recordings reveal hippocampal rhythm underpinnings of language processing.

    Vitória Piai;Vitória Piai;Kristopher L Anderson;Jack J Lin;Callum Dewar

  • Altered white matter integrity in temporal lobe epilepsy: association with cognitive and clinical profiles.

    Jeffrey D. Riley;David L. Franklin;Vicky Choi;Ronald C. Kim

  • Amygdala-hippocampal dynamics during salient information processing

    Jie Zheng;Kristopher L. Anderson;Stephanie L. Leal;Avgusta Shestyuk

  • Integrated analysis of anatomical and electrophysiological human intracranial data.

    Arjen Stolk;Arjen Stolk;Sandon M. Griffin;Roemer van der Meij;Callum Dewar;Callum Dewar

  • A consensus statement on detection of hippocampal sharp wave ripples and differentiation from other fast oscillations

    Unknown

  • MRI Analysis in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Cortical Thinning and White Matter Disruptions Are Related to Side of Seizure Onset

    Nobuko Kemmotsu;Holly M. Girard;Boris C. Bernhardt;Boris C. Bernhardt;Leonardo Bonilha

  • The brain connectome as a personalized biomarker of seizure outcomes after temporal lobectomy

    Leonardo Bonilha;Jens H. Jensen;Nathaniel Baker;Jesse Breedlove

  • Multiplexing of Theta and Alpha Rhythms in the Amygdala-Hippocampal Circuit Supports Pattern Separation of Emotional Information.

    Jie Zheng;Rebecca F. Stevenson;Bryce A. Mander;Lilit Mnatsakanyan

  • Vulnerability of the frontal-temporal connections in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Jack J. Lin;Jeffrey D. Riley;Jenifer Juranek;Steven C. Cramer

  • Default network and frontoparietal control network theta connectivity supports internal attention

    Julia W Y Kam;Jack J Lin;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Tor Endestad

  • Rapid tuning shifts in human auditory cortex enhance speech intelligibility

    Christopher R. Holdgraf;Wendy de Heer;Brian Pasley;Jochem Rieger

  • Cognition and brain development in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

    Camille Garcia-Ramos;Daren C. Jackson;Jack J. Lin;Kevin Dabbs

  • Three-dimensional hippocampal atrophy maps distinguish two common temporal lobe seizure-onset patterns.

    Jennifer A. Ogren;Anatol Bragin;Charles L. Wilson;Gil D. Hoftman

  • Three-dimensional surface maps link local atrophy and fast ripples in human epileptic hippocampus.

    Jennifer A. Ogren;Charles L. Wilson;Anatol Bragin;Jack J. Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Bruce P. Hermann
Bruce P. Hermann University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jana E. Jones
Jana E. Jones University of Wisconsin–Madison
Josef Parvizi
Josef Parvizi Stanford University
Leonardo Bonilha
Leonardo Bonilha Medical University of South Carolina
Matthew P. Walker
Matthew P. Walker University of California, Berkeley
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Carl E. Stafstrom
Carl E. Stafstrom Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael A. Yassa
Michael A. Yassa University of California, Irvine
Vivek Prabhakaran
Vivek Prabhakaran University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, exploring diverse educational and career avenues online can be incredibly beneficial. Many online degree programs now offer flexible options for students seeking to build foundational skills in neuroscience, psychology, and related fields.

Financial accessibility is a key concern for many prospective students. Finding the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA can help minimize student debt while enabling you to access a quality education from home.

In addition to full degrees, high-value online certificates are available in subjects like neurobiology, data analysis, and healthcare. These credentials can complement your main studies and boost your employment prospects in competitive fields.

Graduates with a neuroscience background can pursue a variety of highest paying jobs in medicine, research, biotechnology, mental health, and more. Considering the variety of pathways and growing relevance of online education, now is an excellent time to pursue your ambitions in neuroscience from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jack J. Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles