World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 39 8290 7656 3554 3215 117 6826

Jack J. Lin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack J. Lin between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack J. Lin published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2025. 41 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2025. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 26 publications
2005 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack J. Lin: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 4
2010 1
2011 4
2012 2
2013 5
2014 5
2015 6
2016 12
2017 5
2018 12
2019 13
2020 11
2021 15
2022 21
2023 17
2024 15
2025 26
Total 177
Download as CSV

Jack J. Lin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack J. Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 117 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 117
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack J. Lin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack J. Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack J. Lin is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, psychiatry and mental health, and neurology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of neural dynamics and brain function, memory and neural mechanisms, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural and behavioral psychology studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, functional brain connectivity studies, and epilepsy research and treatment.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jack J. Lin include:

  • An electrophysiological marker of arousal level in humans, 2020, eLife
  • Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions, 2021, Neuron
  • A consensus statement on detection of hippocampal sharp wave ripples and differentiation from other fast oscillations, 2022, Nature Communications
  • A taxonomy of seizure dynamotypes, 2020, eLife
  • Coupling between slow waves and sharp-wave ripples engages distributed neural activity during sleep in humans, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Jack J. Lin frequently publishes in several scientific venues. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, Cerebral Cortex, Journal of the Endocrine Society, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Their collaborations span a range of researchers, with frequent co-authors being Robert T. Knight, David King-Stephens, Kenneth D. Laxer, Peter B. Weber, and Ignacio Sáez.

Best Publications

  • The neurobiology of cognitive disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Brian Bell;Jack J. Lin;Michael Seidenberg;Bruce Hermann

  • Uncovering the neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan

    Jack J Lin;Marco Mula;Bruce P Hermann

  • Neural Mechanisms of Sustained Attention Are Rhythmic.

    Randolph F. Helfrich;Randolph F. Helfrich;Ian C. Fiebelkorn;Sara M. Szczepanski;Jack J. Lin

  • An electrophysiological marker of arousal level in humans.

    Janna D Lendner;Janna D Lendner;Randolph F Helfrich;Bryce A Mander;Luis Romundstad

  • Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

    Anaïs Llorens;Athina Tzovara;Athina Tzovara;Ludovic Bellier;Ilina Bhaya-Grossman

  • Reduced Neocortical Thickness and Complexity Mapped in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy with Hippocampal Sclerosis

    Jack J. Lin;Noriko Salamon;Agatha D. Lee;Rebecca A. Dutton

  • Bidirectional prefrontal-hippocampal dynamics organize information transfer during sleep in humans.

    Randolph F. Helfrich;Janna D. Lendner;Janna D. Lendner;Bryce A. Mander;Heriberto Guillen

  • Direct brain recordings reveal hippocampal rhythm underpinnings of language processing.

    Vitória Piai;Vitória Piai;Kristopher L Anderson;Jack J Lin;Callum Dewar

  • Altered white matter integrity in temporal lobe epilepsy: association with cognitive and clinical profiles.

    Jeffrey D. Riley;David L. Franklin;Vicky Choi;Ronald C. Kim

  • Amygdala-hippocampal dynamics during salient information processing

    Jie Zheng;Kristopher L. Anderson;Stephanie L. Leal;Avgusta Shestyuk

  • Integrated analysis of anatomical and electrophysiological human intracranial data.

    Arjen Stolk;Arjen Stolk;Sandon M. Griffin;Roemer van der Meij;Callum Dewar;Callum Dewar

  • A consensus statement on detection of hippocampal sharp wave ripples and differentiation from other fast oscillations

    Unknown

  • MRI Analysis in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Cortical Thinning and White Matter Disruptions Are Related to Side of Seizure Onset

    Nobuko Kemmotsu;Holly M. Girard;Boris C. Bernhardt;Boris C. Bernhardt;Leonardo Bonilha

  • The brain connectome as a personalized biomarker of seizure outcomes after temporal lobectomy

    Leonardo Bonilha;Jens H. Jensen;Nathaniel Baker;Jesse Breedlove

  • Multiplexing of Theta and Alpha Rhythms in the Amygdala-Hippocampal Circuit Supports Pattern Separation of Emotional Information.

    Jie Zheng;Rebecca F. Stevenson;Bryce A. Mander;Lilit Mnatsakanyan

  • Vulnerability of the frontal-temporal connections in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Jack J. Lin;Jeffrey D. Riley;Jenifer Juranek;Steven C. Cramer

  • Default network and frontoparietal control network theta connectivity supports internal attention

    Julia W Y Kam;Jack J Lin;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Anne-Kristin Solbakk;Tor Endestad

  • Rapid tuning shifts in human auditory cortex enhance speech intelligibility

    Christopher R. Holdgraf;Wendy de Heer;Brian Pasley;Jochem Rieger

  • Cognition and brain development in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

    Camille Garcia-Ramos;Daren C. Jackson;Jack J. Lin;Kevin Dabbs

  • Three-dimensional hippocampal atrophy maps distinguish two common temporal lobe seizure-onset patterns.

    Jennifer A. Ogren;Anatol Bragin;Charles L. Wilson;Gil D. Hoftman

  • Three-dimensional surface maps link local atrophy and fast ripples in human epileptic hippocampus.

    Jennifer A. Ogren;Charles L. Wilson;Anatol Bragin;Jack J. Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Bruce P. Hermann
Bruce P. Hermann University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jana E. Jones
Jana E. Jones University of Wisconsin–Madison
Josef Parvizi
Josef Parvizi Stanford University
Leonardo Bonilha
Leonardo Bonilha Medical University of South Carolina
Matthew P. Walker
Matthew P. Walker University of California, Berkeley
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Carl E. Stafstrom
Carl E. Stafstrom Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael A. Yassa
Michael A. Yassa University of California, Irvine
Vivek Prabhakaran
Vivek Prabhakaran University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, exploring diverse educational and career avenues online can be incredibly beneficial. Many online degree programs now offer flexible options for students seeking to build foundational skills in neuroscience, psychology, and related fields.

Financial accessibility is a key concern for many prospective students. Finding the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA can help minimize student debt while enabling you to access a quality education from home.

In addition to full degrees, high-value online certificates are available in subjects like neurobiology, data analysis, and healthcare. These credentials can complement your main studies and boost your employment prospects in competitive fields.

Graduates with a neuroscience background can pursue a variety of highest paying jobs in medicine, research, biotechnology, mental health, and more. Considering the variety of pathways and growing relevance of online education, now is an excellent time to pursue your ambitions in neuroscience from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jack J. Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles