World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Frank R. Noyes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank R. Noyes sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank R. Noyes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank R. Noyes sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank R. Noyes is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly in surgery and orthopedics. Their research primarily focuses on knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, and sports injuries and prevention.

Their recent publications include studies on both biomechanical and clinical aspects of knee surgery and rehabilitation. Notable papers published by Frank R. Noyes are:

  • Blood Flow Restriction Training Can Improve Peak Torque Strength in Chronic Atrophic Postoperative Quadriceps and Hamstrings Muscles, 2021, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • A Biomechanical Study of Pivot-Shift and Lachman Translations in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Sectioned Knees, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees, and Knees With Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Slackening: Instrumented Lachman Tests Statistically Correlate and Supplement Subjective Pivot-Shift Tests, 2020, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

The scientist frequently collaborates with coauthors such as Sue D. Barber-Westin, Iain R. Murray, Navnit S. Makaram, Andrew G. Geeslin, and Jorge Chahla. These collaborations appear in multiple publications within prominent journals.

Frank R. Noyes has published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine

The main fields of study covered by Frank R. Noyes include medicine with a significant focus on surgery and orthopedics, while also addressing topics related to complementary and alternative medicine, epidemiology, and rheumatology.

Research topics emphasized in their work encompass:

  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Best Publications

  • The Effect of Neuromuscular Training on the Incidence of Knee Injury in Female Athletes A Prospective Study

    Timothy E. Hewett;Thomas N. Lindenfeld;Jennifer V. Riccobene;Frank R. Noyes

  • Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions.

    Frank R. Noyes;David L. Butler;Edward S. Grood;Ronald F. Zernicke

  • Plyometric Training in Female Athletes Decreased Impact Forces and Increased Hamstring Torques

    Timothy E. Hewett;Amanda L. Stroupe;Thomas A. Nance;Frank R. Noyes

  • Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures.

    E S Grood;S F Stowers;F R Noyes

  • The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part II: the results of rehabilitation, activity modification, and counseling on functional disability.

    F R Noyes;D S Matthews;P A Mooar;E S Grood

  • Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees.

    E S Grood;F R Noyes;D L Butler;W J Suntay

  • Biomechanics of ligaments and tendons.

    D L Butler;E S Grood;F R Noyes;R F Zernicke

  • Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

    Frank R. Noyes;Robert E. Mangine;Sue Barber

  • Biomechanics of the knee-extension exercise. Effect of cutting the anterior cruciate ligament.

    E S Grood;W J Suntay;F R Noyes;D L Butler

  • Effects of structure and strain measurement technique on the material properties of young human tendons and fascia.

    David L. Butler;Edward S. Grood;Frank R. Noyes;Ronald F. Zernicke

  • Incidence of Injury in Indoor Soccer.

    T. N. Lindenfeld;D. J. Schmitt;M. P. Hendy;R. E. Mangine

  • Rigorous Statistical Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness Testing of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System in 350 Subjects with Uninjured, Injured, or Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees

    Sue D. Barber-Westin;Frank R. Noyes;John W. McCloskey

  • Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments: Part II: The anterior cruciate ligament

    Mohamed S. Hefzy;Edward S. Grood;Frank R. Noyes

  • Bone-patellar ligament-bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

    F R Noyes;S D Barber;R E Mangine

  • The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee with varus alignment. An analysis of gait adaptations and dynamic joint loadings.

    Frank R. Noyes;Owen D. Schipplein;Thomas P. Andriacchi;Stephen R. Saddemi

  • Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data.

    Michelle Andrews;Frank R. Noyes;Timothy E. Hewett;Thomas P. Andriacchi

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Allograft Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature Athlete

    Michelle Andrews;Frank R. Noyes;Sue D. Barber-Westin

  • Opening Wedge Tibial Osteotomy The 3-Triangle Method to Correct Axial Alignment and Tibial Slope

    Frank R Noyes;Steven X Goebel;John West

  • Revision anterior cruciate surgery with use of bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous grafts.

    Frank R. Noyes;Sue D. Barber-Westin

  • High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction in varus angulated, anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees A two- to seven-year follow-up study

    Frank R. Noyes;Sue D. Barber;Richard Simon

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas P. Andriacchi
Thomas P. Andriacchi Stanford University
Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Lynn Snyder-Mackler University of Delaware
Jon J.P. Warner
Jon J.P. Warner Harvard University
Kurt P. Spindler
Kurt P. Spindler Cleveland Clinic
Russell F. Warren
Russell F. Warren Hospital for Special Surgery

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your expertise beyond a traditional medical degree, several online programs offer valuable pathways into the healthcare field. For nursing professionals aiming for the highest clinical roles, cheap dnp online programs make advanced education more accessible and affordable.

Pharmacists looking to advance quickly can explore 3-year online pharmd programs, which combine flexibility with comprehensive pharmacy training.

For those interested in health data and hospital administration, earning an him degree online can open doors to managing digital health records and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Additionally, students seeking a fast track into the healthcare industry can consider medical billing and coding online courses, building job-ready skills for administrative roles.

These online pathways provide diverse opportunities for those eager to start or advance their healthcare careers, offering flexibility to study while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Frank R. Noyes

Trending Scientists