World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
37871
World Ranking
6026
National Ranking
986

Kevin G. Corley publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin G. Corley sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 69 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kevin G. Corley D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin G. Corley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin G. Corley is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Business, Management and Accounting, with notable contributions to Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The scientist's work encompasses several subfields, including:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Accounting
  • Strategy and Management
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Management Information Systems

Their research topics cover a diverse range of areas, such as:

  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Management Theory and Practice
  • Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Business Strategy and Innovation

Kevin G. Corley has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Karen Golden-Biddle
  • Claus Rerup
  • Pratima Bansal
  • Dennis A. Gioia
  • Beth S. Schinoff

The scientist has published in various academic venues with repeated appearances in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management Inquiry
  • Strategic Management Journal
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Strategic Organization

Recent papers by Kevin G. Corley include:

  • "Corporate directors' implicit theories of the roles and duties of boards," 2021, Strategic Management Journal
  • "A Curated Debate: On Using 'Templates' in Qualitative Research," 2022, Journal of Management Inquiry
  • "Hard and Soft Integration: Towards a Dynamic Model of Post-Acquisition Integration," 2021, Journal of Management Studies
  • "An editorial perspective on judging the quality of inductive research when the methodological straightjacket is loosened," 2020, Strategic Organization
  • "Identity Transitions via Subtle Adaptive Sensemaking: The Empirical Pursuit of the Intangible," 2022, Academy of Management Discoveries

Best Publications

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology

    Dennis A. Gioia;Kevin G. Corley;Aimee L. Hamilton

  • Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions

    Blake E. Ashforth;Spencer H. Harrison;Kevin G. Corley

  • Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability

    Dennis A. Gioia;Majken Schultz;Kevin G. Corley

  • Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off

    Kevin G. Corley;Dennis A. Gioia

  • Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?

    Kevin G. Corley;Dennis A. Gioia

  • Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide*

    Sonali K. Shah;Kevin G. Corley

  • Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building:

    Joel Gehman;Vern L. Glaser;Kathleen M. Eisenhardt;Denny Gioia

  • The Intersection of Organizational Identity, Knowledge, and Practice: Attempting Strategic Change Via Knowledge Grafting

    Rajiv Nag;Kevin G. Corley;Dennis A. Gioia

  • The Coming of Age for Qualitative Research: Embracing the Diversity of Qualitative Methods

    Pratima (Tima) Bansal;Kevin Corley

  • Organizational Identity Formation and Change

    Dennis Arnold Gioia;Shubha D. Patvardhan;Aimeeg L. Hamilton;Kevin G. Corley

  • Guiding Organizational Identity Through Aged Adolescence

    Kevin G. Corley;Celia V. Harquail;Michael G. Pratt;Mary Ann Glynn

  • Publishing in AMJ—Part 7: What's Different about Qualitative Research?

    Pratima Tima Bansal;Kevin Corley

  • Identity in Organizations: Exploring Cross-Level Dynamics

    Blake E. Ashforth;Kristie M. Rogers;Kevin G. Corley

  • Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change

    Kevin G. Corley;Kevin G. Corley

  • Being Good Versus Looking Good: Business School Rankings and the Circean Transformation From Substance to Image

    Dennis A. Gioia;Kevin G. Corley

  • On The Performance Of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: The Interaction Between Partner Interdependence And Technology Attributes

    H. Kevin Steensma;Kevin G. Corley

  • FROM SUPPORT TO MUTINY: SHIFTING LEGITIMACY JUDGMENTS AND EMOTIONAL REACTIONS IMPACTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RADICAL CHANGE

    Quy Nguyen Huy;Kevin G. Corley;Matthew S. Kraatz

  • Organizational Context as a Moderator of Theories on Firm Boundaries for Technology Sourcing

    H. Kevin Steensma;Kevin G. Corley

  • Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense)

    Dennis Arnold Gioia;Kevin G. Corley;Tommaso Fabbri

  • E-survey methodology

    Karen J. Jansen;Kevin G. Corley;Bernard J. Jansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis A. Gioia
Dennis A. Gioia Pennsylvania State University
Blake E. Ashforth
Blake E. Ashforth Arizona State University
Majken Schultz
Majken Schultz Copenhagen Business School
Pratima Bansal
Pratima Bansal University of Western Ontario
Donald D. Bergh
Donald D. Bergh University of Denver
Michael G. Pratt
Michael G. Pratt Boston College
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt Stanford University
H. Kevin Steensma
H. Kevin Steensma University of Washington
Ann Langley
Ann Langley HEC Montréal
José F. Molina-Azorín
José F. Molina-Azorín University of Alicante

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. Many students today are searching for flexible, affordable, and accredited online degree options. For those interested in social work, the cheapest cswe-accredited online msw programs offer a pathway to vital roles in community support and advocacy, without a steep financial burden.

If your interest is in psychology or behavioral analysis, bcba masters programs lead to careers working with individuals diagnosed with autism and behavioral disorders—a highly sought-after and rewarding field. Those looking to advance quickly can consider accelerated msw programs online or accelerated psychology programs online to fast-track their credentials and career opportunities.

With so many affordable and accelerated online programs available, building a career in social sciences or humanities is more accessible than ever. Carefully consider your career goals and research program accreditation to make the best choice for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin G. Corley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles