World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
60
Citations
15630
World Ranking
691
National Ranking
32

Greg F. Naterer publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg F. Naterer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 490 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Greg F. Naterer D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg F. Naterer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Thermodynamics
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering

His primary areas of investigation include Hydrogen production, Exergy, Copper–chlorine cycle, Thermochemical cycle and Waste management. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Nuclear engineering, Water splitting, Pulp and paper industry and Nuclear chemistry. His Exergy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Turbine and Automotive engineering.

The concepts of his Copper–chlorine cycle study are interwoven with issues in Nuclear hydrogen, Chemical engineering, Electrolysis and Generation IV reactor. His Thermochemical cycle research integrates issues from Inorganic chemistry, Spray drying and High-temperature electrolysis. Greg F. Naterer has researched Thermodynamics in several fields, including Solid oxide fuel cell and Thermal efficiency.

His most cited work include:

  • Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production (213 citations)
  • Thermodynamic modeling of a gas turbine cycle combined with a solid oxide fuel cell (187 citations)
  • Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods (176 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Greg F. Naterer spends much of his time researching Hydrogen production, Thermodynamics, Mechanics, Heat transfer and Exergy. His Hydrogen production research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Inorganic chemistry, Waste management and Water splitting. His studies deal with areas such as Hydrogen economy and Solar energy as well as Waste management.

His Mechanics research includes themes of Boundary value problem and Classical mechanics. His research in Heat transfer intersects with topics in Thermal conduction, Heat exchanger and Thermal. The various areas that Greg F. Naterer examines in his Exergy study include Electric vehicle, Turbine and Solid oxide fuel cell.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Hydrogen production (33.17%)
  • Thermodynamics (24.12%)
  • Mechanics (21.11%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Hydrogen production (33.17%)
  • Heat transfer (18.84%)
  • Exergy (16.58%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Hydrogen production, Heat transfer, Exergy, Process engineering and Mechanics. His Hydrogen production research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Heat recovery ventilation, Water splitting and Thermodynamics. His Heat transfer research incorporates themes from Icing, Thermal, Subsea and Petroleum engineering.

Specifically, his work in Exergy is concerned with the study of Exergy efficiency. The Mechanics study combines topics in areas such as Thermal conduction, Evaporation and Front. His research integrates issues of Inorganic chemistry and Electrolysis in his study of Copper–chlorine cycle.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production (213 citations)
  • Performance investigation of an integrated wind energy system for co-generation of power and hydrogen (47 citations)
  • Solar energy based integrated system for power generation, refrigeration and desalination (45 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Thermodynamics
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering

His primary scientific interests are in Hydrogen production, Exergy, Process engineering, Heat recovery ventilation and Copper–chlorine cycle. His Hydrogen production study focuses on Hybrid sulfur cycle in particular. His Exergy research is mostly focused on the topic Exergy efficiency.

His Heat recovery ventilation study incorporates themes from Superheated steam, Water splitting, Copper, Molten salt and Chloride. Thermochemical cycle covers Greg F. Naterer research in Copper–chlorine cycle. His Solar energy research includes elements of Waste management and Photovoltaic system.

Best Publications

  • Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production

    Canan Acar;Ibrahim Dincer;Greg F. Naterer

  • Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods

    E. Cetinkaya;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Exergy analysis of a thermal power plant with measured boiler and turbine losses

    P. Regulagadda;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Heat transfer and thermal management with PCMs in a Li-ion battery cell for electric vehicles

    N. Javani;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer;B.S. Yilbas

  • Heat transfer in phase change materials for thermal management of electric vehicle battery modules

    X. Duan;G.F. Naterer

  • Energy and exergy efficiency comparison of horizontal and vertical axis wind turbines

    K. Pope;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Thermodynamic modeling of a gas turbine cycle combined with a solid oxide fuel cell

    Y. Haseli;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Recent Canadian advances in nuclear-based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle

    Greg F. Naterer;S. Suppiah;M. Lewis;K. Gabriel

  • Comparison of thermochemical, electrolytic, photoelectrolytic and photochemical solar-to-hydrogen production technologies

    Z. Wang;R.R. Roberts;G.F. Naterer;K.S. Gabriel

  • Modeling of passive thermal management for electric vehicle battery packs with PCM between cells

    N. Javani;Ibrahim Dincer;G.F. Naterer;G.L. Rohrauer

  • Exergy analysis of hydrogen production from biomass gasification

    A. Abuadala;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Heat Transfer in Single and Multiphase Systems

    GF Naterer;Lea-Der Chen

  • Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy

    Greg F. Naterer;Ibrahim Dincer;Calin Zamfirescu

  • Canada’s program on nuclear hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle

    G.F. Naterer;S. Suppiah;L. Stolberg;M. Lewis

  • Thermodynamic analysis of a combined gas turbine power system with a solid oxide fuel cell through exergy

    Y. Haseli;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Thermochemical hydrogen production with a copper-chlorine cycle. I: oxygen release from copper oxychloride decomposition

    G.F. Naterer;K. Gabriel;Z.L. Wang;V.N. Daggupati

  • Effects of stator vanes on power coefficients of a zephyr vertical axis wind turbine

    K. Pope;V. Rodrigues;R. Doyle;R. Doyle;A. Tsopelas

  • Thermal and electrochemical performance assessment of a high temperature PEM electrolyzer

    S. Toghyani;E. Afshari;E. Baniasadi;S.A. Atyabi

  • Greenhouse gas emissions assessment of hydrogen and kerosene-fueled aircraft propulsion

    H. Nojoumi;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer

  • Performance evaluation of direct methanol fuel cells for portable applications

    R. Rashidi;I. Dincer;G.F. Naterer;P. Berg

  • Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated SOFC and coal gasification system

    Rami Salah El-Emam;Rami Salah El-Emam;Ibrahim Dincer;Greg F. Naterer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ibrahim Dincer
Ibrahim Dincer University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Marc A. Rosen
Marc A. Rosen University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Yuri S. Muzychka
Yuri S. Muzychka Memorial University of Newfoundland
Igor Pioro
Igor Pioro University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Shahryar Rahnamayan
Shahryar Rahnamayan University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Javad Mostaghimi
Javad Mostaghimi University of Toronto
G. Gary Wang
G. Gary Wang University of Science and Technology of China
Michael Fowler
Michael Fowler University of Waterloo
Magali Ferrandon
Magali Ferrandon Argonne National Laboratory
Bekir Sami Yilbas
Bekir Sami Yilbas King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broader applications of engineering skills, exploring various online degrees can open new doors. Programs like accelerated speech pathology programs offer a faster track to specialized healthcare careers, blending technical knowledge with communication sciences.

Those curious about investigative and analytical professions might consider the pathway outlined in how to become a profiler. This career combines psychology, law enforcement, and critical thinking—skills partially honed through engineering problem-solving.

If you’re interested in supporting others through mental health challenges, researching the different therapy degrees provides insight into various counseling specialties that might align with your passion for helping people.

Moreover, for those seeking easier entry points into counseling, especially alongside engineering backgrounds, exploring the best easiest counseling degree programs can be a practical choice to diversify skills and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Greg F. Naterer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles