World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 45 2921 2716 26 24 145 5668

Elina Vapaavuori publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elina Vapaavuori between 1979 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elina Vapaavuori published across 39 years, from 1979 to 2017, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2002. 4 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2002. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication
1979 2017

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elina Vapaavuori: publications per year, 1979 to 2017
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 4
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 3
1994 6
1995 5
1996 4
1997 9
1998 6
1999 8
2000 11
2001 5
2002 12
2003 11
2004 9
2005 12
2006 5
2007 4
2008 4
2009 7
2010 7
2011 2
2012 4
2013 2
2014 4
2015 2
2016 3
2017 1
Total 160
Download as CSV

Elina Vapaavuori publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elina Vapaavuori sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–145 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 145 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176 145
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Elina Vapaavuori D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elina Vapaavuori sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164 45
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Elina Vapaavuori is affiliated with the Finnish Forest Research Institute in Finland, where their research focuses on forest-related studies. Their work contributes to understanding forest ecosystems and related scientific areas.

The available data does not list any specific recent papers published by Vapaavuori, nor any frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with their work. There is also no information about book publications or awards.

The scientist's main fields of study, subfields, and topics of research have not been explicitly detailed in the provided data. However, given the affiliation with the Finnish Forest Research Institute, their expertise likely involves forestry research and environmental science in Finland.

The absence of detailed bibliographic records, co-author networks, or publication trends limits a more precise outline of their research scope. Nonetheless, their role in the Finnish Forest Research Institute indicates involvement in research activities related to forest ecosystems, management, and conservation within a Finnish context.

Best Publications

  • Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project

    D. F. Karnosky;D. R. Zak;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;C. S. Awmack

  • Physiology of carbon allocation in trees

    Tom Ericsson;Lars Rytter;Elina Vapaavuori

  • HERBIVORE RESISTANCE IN BETULA PENDULA: EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION, DEFOLIATION, AND PLANT GENOTYPE

    Pia Mutikainen;Pia Mutikainen;Mari Walls;Jari Ovaska;Jari Ovaska;Markku Keinänen

  • Stomatal density, anatomy and nutrient concentrations of Scots pine needles are affected by elevated CO2 and temperature

    Eeva-Maria Luomala;Kaisa Laitinen;Sirkka Sutinen;Seppo Kellomäki

  • Effects of root temperature on growth and photosynthesis in conifer seedlings during shoot elongation.

    E. M. Vapaavuori;R. Rikala;A. Ryyppö

  • TRADE-OFFS IN PHENOLIC METABOLISM OF SILVER BIRCH: EFFECTS OF FERTILIZATION, DEFOLIATION, AND GENOTYPE

    Markku Keinänen;Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto;Pia Mutikainen;Pia Mutikainen;Mari Walls

  • Effects of freeze-thaw injury on parameters of distributed electrical circuits of stems and needles of Scots pine seedlings at different stages of acclimation

    Tapani Repo;M.I.N. Zhang;Aija Ryyppö;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Structural characteristics and chemical composition of birch (Betula pendula) leaves are modified by increasing CO2 and ozone

    Elina Oksanen;Johanna Riikonen;Johanna Riikonen;Seija Kaakinen;Toini Holopainen

  • Accumulation of phenolic compounds in birch leaves is changed by elevated carbon dioxide and ozone

    Petri A. Peltonen;Petri A. Peltonen;Elina Vapaavuori;Riitta Julkunen-tiitto

  • Development of freezing tolerance in roots and shoots of Scots pine seedlings at nonfreezing temperatures

    Aija Ryyppö;Tapani Repo;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Chemical factors affecting the brown-rot decay resistance of Scots pine heartwood

    Anni M. Harju;Martti Venäläinen;Seija Anttonen;Hannu Viitanen

  • A computer‐operated routine of gas exchange and optical measurements to diagnose photosynthetic apparatus in leaves

    A. Laisk;V. Oja;B. Rasulov;H. Rämma

  • Emission of volatile organic compounds from two silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) clones grown under ambient and elevated CO2 and different O3 concentrations

    Terhi Vuorinen;Anne-Marja Nerg;Elina Vapaavuori;Jarmo K. Holopainen

  • Stem wood properties of Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera and Acer saccharum saplings after 3 years of treatments to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone

    Seija Kaakinen;Katri Kostiainen;Fredrik Ek;Pekka Saranpaa

  • Effect of elevated [CO2] on stem wood properties of mature Norway spruce grown at different soil nutrient availability

    Katri Kostiainen;Seija Kaakinen;Pekka Saranpää;Bjarni D. Sigurdsson

  • Leaf photosynthetic characteristics of silver birch during three years of exposure to elevated concentrations of CO2 and O3 in the field

    Johanna Riikonen;Toini Holopainen;Elina Oksanen;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Silver birch and climate change: variable growth and carbon allocation responses to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone

    Johanna Riikonen;Minna-Mari Lindsberg;Toini Holopainen;Elina Oksanen

  • Below‐ground responses of silver birch trees exposed to elevated CO2 and O3 levels during three growing seasons

    Anne Kasurinen;Minna M. Keinänen;Saara Kaipainen;Lars‐Ola Nilsson

  • Variable photosynthetic acclimation in consecutive cohorts of Scots pine needles during 3 years of growth at elevated CO2 and elevated temperature

    E.-M. Luomala;K. Laitinen;S. Kellomäki;E. Vapaavuori

  • Photosynthetic parameters of birch (Betula pendula Roth) leaves growing in normal and in CO2‐ and O3‐ enriched atmospheres

    H. Eichelmann;V. Oja;B. Rasulov;E. Padu

  • HCO−3 uptake through the roots and its effect on the productivity of willow cuttings

    E. M. Vapaavuori;P. Pelkonen

  • Influence of long-term nutrient optimization on biomass, carbon, and nitrogen acquisition and allocation in Norway spruce

    Sari Iivonen;Seija Kaakinen;Annika Jolkkonen;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Growth, allocation and tissue chemistry of Picea abies seedlings affected by nutrient supply during the second growing season.

    Seija Kaakinen;Annika Jolkkonen;Sari Iivonen;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Seasonal root growth of Scots pine seedlings in relation to shoot phenology, carbohydrate status, and nutrient supply

    Sari Iivonen;Risto Rikala;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Technical note: A computer-operated routine of gas exchange and optical measurements to diagnose photosynthetic apparatus in leaves

    A. Laisk;V. Oja;B. Rasulov;H. Rämma

Frequent Co-Authors

Elina Oksanen
Elina Oksanen University of Eastern Finland
Toini Holopainen
Toini Holopainen University of Eastern Finland
Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto
Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto University of Eastern Finland
Tapani Repo
Tapani Repo Natural Resources Institute Finland
Jarmo K. Holopainen
Jarmo K. Holopainen University of Eastern Finland
Pekka Saranpää
Pekka Saranpää Finnish Forest Research Institute
Seppo Kellomäki
Seppo Kellomäki University of Eastern Finland
David F. Karnosky
David F. Karnosky Michigan Technological University
Mark E. Kubiske
Mark E. Kubiske US Forest Service
Jaakko Kangasjärvi
Jaakko Kangasjärvi University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Elina Vapaavuori

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles