World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 62 1111 301 194 11882

David F. Karnosky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David F. Karnosky between 1976 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David F. Karnosky published across 40 years, from 1976 to 2015, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2001. 2 of the 199 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2001. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 26 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication
1976 2015

199 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David F. Karnosky: publications per year, 1976 to 2015
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 4
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 5
1987 4
1988 1
1989 4
1990 0
1991 9
1992 6
1993 6
1994 3
1995 2
1996 6
1997 1
1998 6
1999 6
2000 11
2001 26
2002 7
2003 20
2004 7
2005 8
2006 3
2007 13
2008 14
2009 6
2010 13
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 1
Total 199
Download as CSV

David F. Karnosky publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Karnosky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–195 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 194 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100 194
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

David F. Karnosky D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Karnosky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54 62
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

David F. Karnosky is affiliated with Michigan Technological University in the United States. Their academic contributions focus primarily on environmental and ecological research, reflecting their institutional connection to an establishment well-known for its work in forestry and natural resources.

Their research collaborations include co-authorship with various scholars, indicating an engagement with a diverse academic community. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Fischlin, Matthew P. Ayres, Seppo Kellomäki, Bastiaan Louman, and Chin Ee Ong.

  • Andreas Fischlin
  • Matthew P. Ayres
  • Seppo Kellomäki
  • Bastiaan Louman
  • Chin Ee Ong

Although detailed publication records such as recent papers, specific research topics, or fields of study are not provided, the available data suggest an interdisciplinary approach encompassing various aspects of ecological and environmental science, often characteristic of research at Michigan Technological University.

No information on awards, book publications, or frequent publication venues was noted. The absence of specific main fields of study or subfields further indicates limited accessible metadata on their full academic profile.

Overall, the existing data reveal David F. Karnosky as an active researcher within an academic context that engages with multiple collaborators and likely spans a range of topics related to environmental science. The profile reflects their role as a contributor to the scientific understanding of ecological systems through collaboration and institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

    Richard J. Norby;Evan H. DeLucia;Birgit Gielen;Carlo Calfapietra

  • Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis

    Victoria E. Wittig;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Shawna L. Naidu;David F. Karnosky

  • Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2 and O3.

    Kevin E. Percy;Caroline S. Awmack;Richard L. Lindroth;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project

    D. F. Karnosky;D. R. Zak;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;C. S. Awmack

  • Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate

    D. F. Karnosky;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Donald R. Zak;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Perspectives regarding 50 years of research on effects of tropospheric ozone air pollution on US forests

    David F. Karnosky;John M. Skelly;Kevin E. Percy;Art H. Chappelka

  • Fine-root biomass and fluxes of soil carbon in young stands of paper birch and trembling aspen as affected by elevated atmospheric CO 2 and tropospheric O 3

    J. S. King;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;D. R. Zak;J. Sober

  • Tropospheric O3 compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO2

    John S. King;John S. King;Mark E. Kubiske;Kurt S. Pregitzer;George R. Hendrey

  • Stomatal and non‐stomatal limitation to photosynthesis in two trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones exposed to elevated CO2 and/or O3

    A. Noormets;A. Sôber;E. J. Pell;R. E. Dickson

  • Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone

    J. G. Isebrands;E. P. McDonald;E. Kruger;G. Hendrey

  • Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of a conifer:Larix decidua

    Yinghua Huang;Alexander M. Diner;David F. Karnosky

  • Forest atmosphere carbon transfer and storage (FACTS-II) the aspen Free-air CO2 and O3 Enrichment (FACE) project: an overview.

    R.E. Dickson;K.F. Lewin;J.G. Isebrands;Coleman

  • Next generation of elevated [CO2] experiments with crops: a critical investment for feeding the future world

    Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Claus Beier;Carlo Calfapietra;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • Changes in growth, leaf abscission, and biomass associated with seasonal tropospheric ozone exposures of Populus tremuloides clones and seedlings

    D.F. Karnosky;Z.E. Gagnon;R.E. Dickson;Coleman

  • Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO(2) on forest trees and forest ecosystems: knowledge gaps.

    David F. Karnosky

  • Ozone‐induced H2O2 accumulation in field‐grown aspen and birch is linked to foliar ultrastructure and peroxisomal activity

    E. Oksanen;E. Häikiö;J. Sober;D. F. Karnosky

  • Free-Air Exposure Systems to Scale up Ozone Research to Mature Trees

    D. F. Karnosky;H. Werner;T. Holopainen;K. Percy

  • Consequences of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone for foliar chemical composition and dynamics in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera).

    Richard L. Lindroth;Brian J. Kopper;William F.J. Parsons;James G. Bockheim

  • Impacts of global change on diseases of agricultural crops and forest trees

    Sukumar Chakraborty;Jo Luck;Grant Hollaway;Angela Freeman

  • Future atmospheric CO2 leads to delayed autumnal senescence

    Gail Taylor;Matthew J. Tallis;Christian P. Giardina;Kevin E. Percy

  • Effects of Tropospheric O3 on Trembling Aspen and Interaction with CO2: Results from an O3-Gradient and a Face Experiment

    D.F. Karnosky;B. Mankovska;K. Percy;R.E. Dickson

  • Isoprene emission from terrestrial ecosystems in response to global change: minding the gap between models and observations.

    Russell K Monson;Russell K Monson;Nicole Trahan;Nicole Trahan;Todd N Rosenstiel;Todd N Rosenstiel;Patrick Veres;Patrick Veres

  • Photosynthetic responses of aspen clones to simultaneous exposures of ozone and CO2

    O. Kull;A. Sober;M.D. Coleman;R.E. Dickson

  • Transgenic larch expressing genes for herbicide and insect resistance

    Dong-Ill Shin;Gopi K. Podila;Yinghua Huang;David F. Karnosky

  • Isoprene emission rates under elevated CO2 and O3 in two field‐grown aspen clones differing in their sensitivity to O3

    Carlo Calfapietra;Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza;David F. Karnosky;Francesco Loreto

  • Isoprene synthase expression and protein levels are reduced under elevated O3 but not under elevated CO2 (FACE) in field-grown aspen trees

    Carlo Calfapietra;Amy E. Wiberley;Tanya G. Falbel;Autumn R. Linskey

  • Photosynthesis, light and nitrogen relationships in a young deciduous forest canopy under open‐air CO2 enrichment

    Y. Takeuchi;M. E. Kubiske;J. G. Isebrands;K.S. Pregtizer

  • The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems

    D.F. Karnosky;R. Ceulemans;G.E. Scarascia-Mugnozza;J.L. Innes

  • Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests

    Alan F. Talhelm;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Mark E. Kubiske;Donald R. Zak

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin E. Percy
Kevin E. Percy K.E. Percy Air Quality Effects Consulting Ltd
J. G. Isebrands
J. G. Isebrands US Forest Service
Mark E. Kubiske
Mark E. Kubiske US Forest Service
Kurt S. Pregitzer
Kurt S. Pregitzer University of Idaho
Asko Noormets
Asko Noormets Texas A&M University
Elina Oksanen
Elina Oksanen University of Eastern Finland
George R. Hendrey
George R. Hendrey City University of New York
Elina Vapaavuori
Elina Vapaavuori Finnish Forest Research Institute
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
John S. King
John S. King North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David F. Karnosky

Recently Published Articles