World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
62
Citations
11882
World Ranking
1111
National Ranking
301

David F. Karnosky publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Karnosky sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 194 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

David F. Karnosky D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Karnosky sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Karnosky is affiliated with Michigan Technological University in the United States. Their academic contributions focus primarily on environmental and ecological research, reflecting their institutional connection to an establishment well-known for its work in forestry and natural resources.

Their research collaborations include co-authorship with various scholars, indicating an engagement with a diverse academic community. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Fischlin, Matthew P. Ayres, Seppo Kellomäki, Bastiaan Louman, and Chin Ee Ong.

  • Andreas Fischlin
  • Matthew P. Ayres
  • Seppo Kellomäki
  • Bastiaan Louman
  • Chin Ee Ong

Although detailed publication records such as recent papers, specific research topics, or fields of study are not provided, the available data suggest an interdisciplinary approach encompassing various aspects of ecological and environmental science, often characteristic of research at Michigan Technological University.

No information on awards, book publications, or frequent publication venues was noted. The absence of specific main fields of study or subfields further indicates limited accessible metadata on their full academic profile.

Overall, the existing data reveal David F. Karnosky as an active researcher within an academic context that engages with multiple collaborators and likely spans a range of topics related to environmental science. The profile reflects their role as a contributor to the scientific understanding of ecological systems through collaboration and institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

    Richard J. Norby;Evan H. DeLucia;Birgit Gielen;Carlo Calfapietra

  • Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis

    Victoria E. Wittig;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Shawna L. Naidu;David F. Karnosky

  • Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2 and O3.

    Kevin E. Percy;Caroline S. Awmack;Richard L. Lindroth;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project

    D. F. Karnosky;D. R. Zak;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;C. S. Awmack

  • Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate

    D. F. Karnosky;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Donald R. Zak;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Perspectives regarding 50 years of research on effects of tropospheric ozone air pollution on US forests

    David F. Karnosky;John M. Skelly;Kevin E. Percy;Art H. Chappelka

  • Fine-root biomass and fluxes of soil carbon in young stands of paper birch and trembling aspen as affected by elevated atmospheric CO 2 and tropospheric O 3

    J. S. King;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;D. R. Zak;J. Sober

  • Tropospheric O3 compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO2

    John S. King;John S. King;Mark E. Kubiske;Kurt S. Pregitzer;George R. Hendrey

  • Stomatal and non‐stomatal limitation to photosynthesis in two trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones exposed to elevated CO2 and/or O3

    A. Noormets;A. Sôber;E. J. Pell;R. E. Dickson

  • Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone

    J. G. Isebrands;E. P. McDonald;E. Kruger;G. Hendrey

  • Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of a conifer:Larix decidua

    Yinghua Huang;Alexander M. Diner;David F. Karnosky

  • Forest atmosphere carbon transfer and storage (FACTS-II) the aspen Free-air CO2 and O3 Enrichment (FACE) project: an overview.

    R.E. Dickson;K.F. Lewin;J.G. Isebrands;Coleman

  • Next generation of elevated [CO2] experiments with crops: a critical investment for feeding the future world

    Elizabeth A. Ainsworth;Claus Beier;Carlo Calfapietra;Reinhart Ceulemans

  • Changes in growth, leaf abscission, and biomass associated with seasonal tropospheric ozone exposures of Populus tremuloides clones and seedlings

    D.F. Karnosky;Z.E. Gagnon;R.E. Dickson;Coleman

  • Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO(2) on forest trees and forest ecosystems: knowledge gaps.

    David F. Karnosky

  • Ozone‐induced H2O2 accumulation in field‐grown aspen and birch is linked to foliar ultrastructure and peroxisomal activity

    E. Oksanen;E. Häikiö;J. Sober;D. F. Karnosky

  • Free-Air Exposure Systems to Scale up Ozone Research to Mature Trees

    D. F. Karnosky;H. Werner;T. Holopainen;K. Percy

  • Consequences of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone for foliar chemical composition and dynamics in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera).

    Richard L. Lindroth;Brian J. Kopper;William F.J. Parsons;James G. Bockheim

  • Impacts of global change on diseases of agricultural crops and forest trees

    Sukumar Chakraborty;Jo Luck;Grant Hollaway;Angela Freeman

  • Future atmospheric CO2 leads to delayed autumnal senescence

    Gail Taylor;Matthew J. Tallis;Christian P. Giardina;Kevin E. Percy

  • Effects of Tropospheric O3 on Trembling Aspen and Interaction with CO2: Results from an O3-Gradient and a Face Experiment

    D.F. Karnosky;B. Mankovska;K. Percy;R.E. Dickson

  • Isoprene emission from terrestrial ecosystems in response to global change: minding the gap between models and observations.

    Russell K Monson;Russell K Monson;Nicole Trahan;Nicole Trahan;Todd N Rosenstiel;Todd N Rosenstiel;Patrick Veres;Patrick Veres

  • Photosynthetic responses of aspen clones to simultaneous exposures of ozone and CO2

    O. Kull;A. Sober;M.D. Coleman;R.E. Dickson

  • Transgenic larch expressing genes for herbicide and insect resistance

    Dong-Ill Shin;Gopi K. Podila;Yinghua Huang;David F. Karnosky

  • Isoprene emission rates under elevated CO2 and O3 in two field‐grown aspen clones differing in their sensitivity to O3

    Carlo Calfapietra;Giuseppe Scarascia Mugnozza;David F. Karnosky;Francesco Loreto

  • Isoprene synthase expression and protein levels are reduced under elevated O3 but not under elevated CO2 (FACE) in field-grown aspen trees

    Carlo Calfapietra;Amy E. Wiberley;Tanya G. Falbel;Autumn R. Linskey

  • Photosynthesis, light and nitrogen relationships in a young deciduous forest canopy under open‐air CO2 enrichment

    Y. Takeuchi;M. E. Kubiske;J. G. Isebrands;K.S. Pregtizer

  • The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems

    D.F. Karnosky;R. Ceulemans;G.E. Scarascia-Mugnozza;J.L. Innes

  • Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests

    Alan F. Talhelm;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Mark E. Kubiske;Donald R. Zak

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin E. Percy
Kevin E. Percy K.E. Percy Air Quality Effects Consulting Ltd
J. G. Isebrands
J. G. Isebrands US Forest Service
Mark E. Kubiske
Mark E. Kubiske US Forest Service
Kurt S. Pregitzer
Kurt S. Pregitzer University of Idaho
Asko Noormets
Asko Noormets Texas A&M University
Elina Oksanen
Elina Oksanen University of Eastern Finland
George R. Hendrey
George R. Hendrey City University of New York
Elina Vapaavuori
Elina Vapaavuori Finnish Forest Research Institute
Reinhart Ceulemans
Reinhart Ceulemans University of Antwerp
John S. King
John S. King North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David F. Karnosky