World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 51 2061 1897 16 14 152 7918

Elina Oksanen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elina Oksanen between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elina Oksanen published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2021. 9 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 8 publications
1999 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elina Oksanen: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 11
2002 5
2003 10
2004 10
2005 7
2006 4
2007 10
2008 9
2009 11
2010 10
2011 2
2012 3
2013 7
2014 7
2015 8
2016 4
2017 6
2018 7
2019 5
2020 7
2021 12
2022 4
2023 1
2024 1
2025 8
Total 173
Download as CSV

Elina Oksanen publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elina Oksanen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–155 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 152 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147 152
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Elina Oksanen D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elina Oksanen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122 51
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Gene

Her primary areas of investigation include Botany, Ozone, Horticulture, Photosynthesis and Betulaceae. Many of her studies on Botany apply to DNA sequencing as well. Her Ozone research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Chlorophyll, Terpene, Herbivore, Stomatal conductance and Nutrient.

Her work carried out in the field of Horticulture brings together such families of science as Tropospheric ozone and Phenols. Her research integrates issues of Acclimatization and Quercetin in her study of Photosynthesis. Quaking Aspen and Temperate climate is closely connected to Salicaceae in her research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Betulaceae.

Her most cited work include:

  • Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project (274 citations)
  • Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2 and O3. (264 citations)
  • Effects of elevated O3, alone and in combination with elevated CO2, on tree leaf chemistry and insect herbivore performance: a meta‐analysis (150 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Her primary scientific interests are in Botany, Ozone, Betula pendula, Horticulture and Photosynthesis. Her works in Betulaceae, Stomatal conductance, Growing season, Dry weight and Chlorophyll are all subjects of inquiry into Botany. Her work on Tropospheric ozone as part of general Ozone study is frequently linked to Flux, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Ecology, Climate change, Herbivore, Deciduous and Acclimatization in addition to Betula pendula. Her Horticulture study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Ozone exposure, Nutrient and Palisade cell. Her Photosynthesis research includes elements of Antioxidant and Plant physiology.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (54.74%)
  • Ozone (37.23%)
  • Betula pendula (36.50%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Betula pendula (36.50%)
  • Botany (54.74%)
  • Horticulture (32.85%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her main research concerns Betula pendula, Botany, Horticulture, Ozone and Trichome. Her Betula pendula study incorporates themes from Global warming, Ecology, Climate change, Germplasm and Photosynthetic capacity. Her Botany research is mostly focused on the topic Betula pubescens.

Elina Oksanen combines subjects such as Photosynthesis, Stomatal conductance and Acclimatization with her study of Horticulture. Her Ozone research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Biosphere, Biosphere model, Productivity, Fumigation and Forest ecology. Her studies in Trichome integrate themes in fields like Water stress and Oxidative stress.

Between 2016 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Genome sequencing and population genomic analyses provide insights into the adaptive landscape of silver birch (108 citations)
  • Ozone affects plant, insect, and soil microbial communities: A threat to terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity (25 citations)
  • Growth of northern deciduous trees under increasing atmospheric humidity: possible mechanisms behind the growth retardation (21 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Gene

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Trichome, Betula pendula, Stomatal conductance and Relative humidity. Elina Oksanen is interested in Betula pubescens, which is a field of Botany. Her Trichome study combines topics in areas such as Biotic stress, Oxidative stress and Ozone.

Her studies deal with areas such as Water stress, Germplasm, DNA sequencing and Water content as well as Betula pendula. Elina Oksanen has researched Stomatal conductance in several fields, including Catalase, Productivity, Lipid peroxidation, Horticulture and Biomass. Her work deals with themes such as Field experiment, Wax and Abiotic component, which intersect with Relative humidity.

Best Publications

  • Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2 and O3.

    Kevin E. Percy;Caroline S. Awmack;Richard L. Lindroth;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Ozone affects plant, insect, and soil microbial communities: A threat to terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity

    Evgenios Agathokleous;Zhaozhong Feng;Elina Oksanen;Pierre Sicard

  • Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project

    D. F. Karnosky;D. R. Zak;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;C. S. Awmack

  • Genome sequencing and population genomic analyses provide insights into the adaptive landscape of silver birch

    Jarkko Salojärvi;Olli Pekka Smolander;Kaisa Nieminen;Sitaram Rajaraman

  • Effects of elevated O3, alone and in combination with elevated CO2, on tree leaf chemistry and insect herbivore performance: a meta‐analysis

    Elena Valkama;Julia Koricheva;Elina Oksanen

  • New critical levels for ozone effects on young trees based on AOT40 and simulated cumulative leaf uptake of ozone

    P.E. Karlsson;J. Uddling;S. Braun;M. Broadmeadow

  • Risk assessments for forest trees: the performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts.

    P.E. Karlsson;S. Braun;M. Broadmeadow;S. Elvira

  • Ozone‐induced H2O2 accumulation in field‐grown aspen and birch is linked to foliar ultrastructure and peroxisomal activity

    E. Oksanen;E. Häikiö;J. Sober;D. F. Karnosky

  • Free-Air Exposure Systems to Scale up Ozone Research to Mature Trees

    D. F. Karnosky;H. Werner;T. Holopainen;K. Percy

  • Effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on aspen clones varying in O3 sensitivity: can CO2 ameliorate the harmful effects of O3?

    B.A Wustman;E Oksanen;D.F Karnosky;A Noormets

  • Structural characteristics and chemical composition of birch (Betula pendula) leaves are modified by increasing CO2 and ozone

    Elina Oksanen;Johanna Riikonen;Johanna Riikonen;Seija Kaakinen;Toini Holopainen

  • New flux based dose-response relationships for ozone for European forest tree species

    P. Büker;Z. Feng;J. Uddling;A. Briolat

  • Effects of long-term open-field ozone exposure on leaf phenolics of European silver birch (Betula pendula Roth).

    Ammar Saleem;Jyrki Loponen;Kalevi Pihlaja;Elina Oksanen

  • Leaf phenolic compounds in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) induced by exposure to moderately elevated ozone.

    Niina M.M. Saviranta;Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto;Elina Oksanen;Reijo O. Karjalainen

  • Advances in understanding ozone impact on forest trees: Messages from novel phytotron and free-air fumigation studies

    R. Matyssek;D.F. Karnosky;G. Wieser;K. Percy

  • Impacts of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on leaf ultrastructure of aspen (Populus tremuloides) and birch (Betula papyrifera) in the aspen FACE experiment.

    E Oksanen;J Sober;D.F Karnosky

  • Emission of herbivore‐induced volatile terpenoids from two hybrid aspen (Populus tremula×tremuloides) clones under ambient and elevated ozone concentrations in the field

    James D. Blande;Päivi Tiiva;Elina Oksanen;Jarmo K. Holopainen

  • Ozone exposure over two growing seasons alters root‐to‐shoot ratio and chemical composition of birch (Betula pendula Roth)

    K. Yamaji;R. Julkunen-Tiitto;M. Rousi;V. Freiwald

  • Emissions of volatile organic compounds and leaf structural characteristics of European aspen (Populus tremula) grown under elevated ozone and temperature.

    Kaisa Hartikainen;Anne-marja Nerg;Minna Kivimäenpää;Sari Kontunen-soppela

  • Real‐time monitoring of herbivore induced volatile emissions in the field

    Andrea Schaub;James D. Blande;Martin Graus;Elina Oksanen

  • Impacts of increasing ozone on Indian plants

    E. Oksanen;V. Pandey;A.K. Pandey;S. Keski-Saari

  • Leaf photosynthetic characteristics of silver birch during three years of exposure to elevated concentrations of CO2 and O3 in the field

    Johanna Riikonen;Toini Holopainen;Elina Oksanen;Elina Vapaavuori

  • Silver birch and climate change: variable growth and carbon allocation responses to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone

    Johanna Riikonen;Minna-Mari Lindsberg;Toini Holopainen;Elina Oksanen

  • Volatile emissions and phenolic compound concentrations along a vertical profile of Populus nigra leaves exposed to realistic ozone concentrations.

    Silvano Fares;Elina Oksanen;Mika Lännenpää;Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto

  • Interactive effect of springtime frost and elevated ozone on early growth, foliar injuries and leaf structure of birch (Betula pendula)

    Nadezhda Prozherina;Vera Freiwald;Matti Rousi;Elina Oksanen

  • Searching for common responsive parameters for ozone tolerance in 18 rice cultivars in India: Results from ethylenediurea studies

    Ashutosh K. Pandey;Baisakhi Majumder;Sarita Keski-Saari;Sari Kontunen-Soppela

  • Ozone affects ascorbate and glutathione biosynthesis as well as amino acid contents in three Euramerican poplar genotypes

    Jennifer Dumont;Sarita Keski-Saari;Markku Keinänen;David Cohen;David Cohen

  • Leaf litter decomposition differs among genotypes in a local Betula pendula population.

    Tarja Silfver;Juha Mikola;Juha Mikola;Matti Rousi;Heikki Roininen

  • Photosynthesis of birch (Betula pendula) is sensitive to springtime frost and ozone

    Elina Oksanen;Vera Freiwald;Nadezhda Prozherina;Matti Rousi

  • Differences in leaf characteristics between ozone-sensitive and ozone-tolerant hybrid aspen (Populus tremula × Populus tremuloides) clones

    Elina Häikiö;Vera Freiwald;Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto;Egbert Beuker

  • Interactive effects of elevated ozone and temperature on carbon allocation of silver birch (Betula pendula) genotypes in an open-air field exposure

    Anne Kasurinen;Christina Biasi;Toini Holopainen;Matti Rousi

  • Vertical profiles reveal impact of ozone and temperature on carbon assimilation of Betula pendula and Populus tremula.

    Maarit Mäenpää;Johanna Riikonen;Johanna Riikonen;Sari Kontunen-Soppela;Matti Rousi

  • Needle metabolome, freezing tolerance and gas exchange in Norway spruce seedlings exposed to elevated temperature and ozone concentration.

    Johanna Riikonen;Johanna Riikonen;Sari Kontunen-Soppela;Vladimir Ossipov;Arja Tervahauta

  • Gene expression responses of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) to elevated CO2 and O3 during leaf maturation and senescence.

    Sari Kontunen-Soppela;Sari Kontunen-Soppela;Juha Parviainen;Hanna Ruhanen;Mikael Brosché

  • Northern environment predisposes birches to ozone damage.

    E. Oksanen;S. Kontunen-Soppela;J. Riikonen;P. Peltonen

  • Thermal and hyperspectral imaging for Norway spruce (Picea abies) seeds screening

    Jennifer Dumont;Tapani Hirvonen;Ville Heikkinen;Maxime Mistretta

Frequent Co-Authors

Elina Vapaavuori
Elina Vapaavuori Finnish Forest Research Institute
Matti Rousi
Matti Rousi Finnish Forest Research Institute
Toini Holopainen
Toini Holopainen University of Eastern Finland
Markku Keinänen
Markku Keinänen University of Eastern Finland
David F. Karnosky
David F. Karnosky Michigan Technological University
Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto
Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto University of Eastern Finland
Jarmo K. Holopainen
Jarmo K. Holopainen University of Eastern Finland
Mark E. Kubiske
Mark E. Kubiske US Forest Service
Johan Uddling
Johan Uddling University of Gothenburg
Lisa Emberson
Lisa Emberson University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Elina Oksanen

Trending Scientists