World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
47
Citations
8708
World Ranking
2524
National Ranking
627

Mark E. Kubiske publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Kubiske sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 82 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Mark E. Kubiske D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Kubiske sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Mark E. Kubiske focuses on Agronomy, Botany, Ecosystem, Ecology and Photosynthesis. His studies in Agronomy integrate themes in fields like Temperate forest, Salicaceae and Biogeochemical cycle. His Botany study frequently involves adjacent topics like Horticulture.

Mark E. Kubiske has included themes like Canopy and Betulaceae in his Ecosystem study. Ecology is a component of his Forest ecology and Temperate climate studies. His Forest ecology research includes elements of Trophic level, Primary production and Climate change, Global change.

His most cited work include:

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. (803 citations)
  • Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2 (304 citations)
  • Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots (285 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Botany, Agronomy, Horticulture, Ecology and Photosynthesis are his primary areas of study. His research on Botany frequently links to adjacent areas such as Carbon dioxide. His studies deal with areas such as Biogeochemical cycle, Canopy, Soil water and Nitrogen cycle as well as Agronomy.

In Horticulture, Mark E. Kubiske works on issues like Environmental factor, which are connected to Betulaceae. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Plant nutrition, Deserts and xeric shrublands, Shade tolerance and Understory. His Forest ecology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Trophic level and Climate change, Global change.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (52.70%)
  • Agronomy (29.73%)
  • Horticulture (27.03%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2019)?

  • Ecology (25.68%)
  • Ecosystem (17.57%)
  • Climate change (9.46%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Ecology, Ecosystem, Climate change, Global change and Productivity. His work on Biomass, Woody plant, Pollutant and Relative species abundance as part of general Ecology study is frequently linked to Heritability, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. As a part of the same scientific family, Mark E. Kubiske mostly works in the field of Ecosystem, focusing on Growing season and, on occasion, Horticulture.

His Climate change research integrates issues from Forest dynamics, Competition and Environmental resource management. His Global change study incorporates themes from Dominance, Forestry and Shade tolerance. In his study, Forest ecology is inextricably linked to Soil respiration, which falls within the broad field of Primary production.

Between 2011 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests. (44 citations)
  • Integrating ecophysiology and forest landscape models to improve projections of drought effects under climate change (31 citations)
  • Wood properties of Populus and Betula in long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and O3 (24 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

His main research concerns Ecosystem, Productivity, Ecology, Empirical measure and Juniperus monosperma. Mark E. Kubiske performs integrative study on Ecosystem and Impact studies in his works. Impact studies combines with fields such as Horticulture, Interactive effects, Trembling aspen, Botany and Growing season in his work.

Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Radial growth and Horticulture. His Agronomy research extends to Ecology, which is thematically connected. His Empirical measure research includes elements of Competition, Juniper, Environmental resource management, Climate change and Agroforestry.

Best Publications

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

    Richard J. Norby;Evan H. DeLucia;Birgit Gielen;Carlo Calfapietra

  • Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2

    Adrien C. Finzi;Richard J. Norby;Carlo Calfapietra;Anne Gallet-Budynek

  • Photosynthesis, carboxylation and leaf nitrogen responses of 16 species to elevated pCO2 across four free‐air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert

    David S Ellsworth;Peter B Reich;Elke S Naumburg;George W Koch

  • Atmospheric CO2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots

    Kurt S. Pregitzer;Donald R. Zak;Peter S. Curtis;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Altered performance of forest pests under atmospheres enriched by CO2 and O3.

    Kevin E. Percy;Caroline S. Awmack;Richard L. Lindroth;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Leaf structural characteristics of 31 hardwood and conifer tree species in central Wisconsin: influence of light regime and shade-tolerance rank.

    Marc David Abrams;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project

    D. F. Karnosky;D. R. Zak;K. S. Pregitzer;K. S. Pregitzer;C. S. Awmack

  • Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate

    D. F. Karnosky;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Donald R. Zak;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species.

    Kurt S. Pregitzer;Mark E. Kubiske;Chui Kwan Yu;Ronald L. Hendrick

  • Tropospheric O3 compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO2

    John S. King;John S. King;Mark E. Kubiske;Kurt S. Pregitzer;George R. Hendrey

  • Relating wet and dry year ecophysiology to leaf structure in contrasting temperate tree species

    Marc D. Abrams;Mark E. Kubiske;Scott A. Mostoller

  • Effects of elevated CO2 and light availability on the photosynthetic light response of trees of contrasting shade tolerance

    Mark E. Kubiske;Kurt S. Pregitzer

  • GAS EXCHANGE, LEAF NITROGEN, AND GROWTH EFFICIENCY OF POPULUS TREMULOIDES IN A CO2-ENRICHED ATMOSPHERE

    Peter S. Curtis;Christopher S. Vogel;Xianzhong Wang;Kurt S. Pregitzer

  • Future atmospheric CO2 leads to delayed autumnal senescence

    Gail Taylor;Matthew J. Tallis;Christian P. Giardina;Kevin E. Percy

  • Effects of Tropospheric O3 on Trembling Aspen and Interaction with CO2: Results from an O3-Gradient and a Face Experiment

    D.F. Karnosky;B. Mankovska;K. Percy;R.E. Dickson

  • Forest productivity under elevated CO2 and O3: positive feedbacks to soil N cycling sustain decade-long net primary productivity enhancement by CO2

    Donald R. Zak;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Mark E. Kubiske;Andrew J. Burton

  • Ecophysiological and morphological responses to shade and drought in two contrasting ecotypes of Prunus serotina

    Marc D. Abrams;Brian D. Kloeppel;Mark E. Kubiske

  • Combined effects of atmospheric CO 2 and N availability on the belowground carbon and nitrogen dynamics of aspen mesocosms

    Carl J. Mikan;Donald R. Zak;Mark E. Kubiske;Kurt S. Pregitzer

  • Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes of Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.: photosynthesis, water relations and leaf morphology.

    M. D. Abrams;M. E. Kubiske;K. C. Steiner

  • Growth and C allocation of Populus tremuloides genotypes in response to atmospheric CO2 and soil N availability

    Mark E. Kubiske;Kurt S. Pregitzer;Donald R. Zak;Carl J. Mikan

  • Advances in understanding ozone impact on forest trees: Messages from novel phytotron and free-air fumigation studies

    R. Matyssek;D.F. Karnosky;G. Wieser;K. Percy

  • Soil fungal-arthropod responses to Populus tremuloides grown under enriched atmospheric CO2 under field conditions

    John Klironomos;Matthias Rillig;Michael Allen;Donald R. Zak

  • Photosynthesis, water relations, and leaf morphology of xeric versus mesic Quercusrubra ecotypes in central Pennsylvania in relation to moisture stress

    Mark E. Kubiske;Marc D. Abrams

  • Rehydration effects on pressure-volume relationships in four temperate woody species: variability with site, time of season and drought conditions.

    M. E. Kubiske;M. D. Abrams

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt S. Pregitzer
Kurt S. Pregitzer University of Idaho
David F. Karnosky
David F. Karnosky Michigan Technological University
Donald R. Zak
Donald R. Zak University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marc D. Abrams
Marc D. Abrams Pennsylvania State University
Elina Vapaavuori
Elina Vapaavuori Finnish Forest Research Institute
Kevin E. Percy
Kevin E. Percy K.E. Percy Air Quality Effects Consulting Ltd
John S. King
John S. King North Carolina State University
Elina Oksanen
Elina Oksanen University of Eastern Finland
George R. Hendrey
George R. Hendrey City University of New York
Andrew J. Burton
Andrew J. Burton Michigan Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Kubiske

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles