World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6289
World Ranking
11159
National Ranking
4626

Pedro Szekely publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Szekely sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 229 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pedro Szekely D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro Szekely sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro Szekely is affiliated with Amazon in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics in the domain of advanced computational methods and semantic data management. Key research topics include:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis

Pedro Szekely has contributed to numerous academic publications, with a strong presence in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), and conferences like the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Some selected recent papers include:

  • Robust (Controlled) Table-to-Text Generation with Structure-Aware Equivariance Learning, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Augmenting Knowledge Graphs for Better Link Prediction, 2022, Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Connecting the Dots: A Knowledgeable Path Generator for Commonsense Question Answering, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • TOMATE: A heuristic-based approach to extract data from HTML tables, 2021, Information Sciences
  • Hybrid forecasting of geopolitical events†, 2023, AI Magazine

The scientist collaborates frequently with several peers in the research community. Regular coauthors include Filip Ilievski, Daniel Garijo, Kartik Shenoy, Hans Chalupsky, and Daniel Schwabe. These collaborations reflect engagement across multiple aspects of artificial intelligence and data science research.

Pedro Szekely's publication record displays a concentrated interest in the practical and theoretical aspects of knowledge representation, natural language processing, and graph neural networks, often addressing challenges in data quality and structured information extraction. With a substantial number of works available on preprint servers and open repositories, their work contributes to evolving methodologies for semantic analysis and machine learning applications.

Best Publications

  • MAAN: a multi-attribute addressable network for grid information services

    M. Cai;M. Frank;J. Chen;P. Szekely

  • Retrospective and Challenges for Model-Based Interface Development

    Pedro A. Szekely

  • Declarative interface models for user interface construction tools: the MASTERMIND approach

    Pedro A. Szekely;Piyawadee Noi Sukaviriya;Pablo Castells;Jeyakumar Muthukumarasamy

  • Semi-automatically mapping structured sources into the semantic web

    Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro Szekely;José Luis Ambite;Aman Goel

  • Beyond interface builders: model-based interface tools

    Pedro Szekely;Ping Luo;Robert Neches

  • Building Mashups by example

    Rattapoom Tuchinda;Pedro Szekely;Craig A. Knoblock

  • Facilitating the exploration of interface design alternatives: the HUMANOID model of interface design

    Pedro Szekely;Ping Luo;Robert Neches

  • Design alternatives for user interface management sytems based on experience with COUSIN

    Philip J. Hayes;Pedro A. Szekely;Richard A. Lerner

  • A user interface toolkit based on graphical objects and constraints

    Pedro Szekely;Brad Myers

  • MAAN: A Multi-Attribute Addressable Network for Grid Information Services

    Unknown

  • Building and Using a Knowledge Graph to Combat Human Trafficking

    Pedro Szekely;Craig A. Knoblock;Jason Slepicka;Andrew Philpot

  • Connecting the Smithsonian American Art Museum to the Linked Data Cloud

    Pedro A. Szekely;Craig A. Knoblock;Fengyu Yang;Xuming Zhu

  • Semantic Labeling: A Domain-Independent Approach

    Minh Pham;Suresh Alse;Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro A. Szekely

  • Knowledgeable development environments using shared design models

    Robert Neches;Jim Foley;Pedro Szekely;Piyawadee Sukaviriya

  • Learning the semantics of structured data sources

    Mohsen Taheriyan;Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro Szekely;José Luis Ambite

  • Karma: A System for Mapping Structured Sources into the Semantic Web

    Shubham Gupta;Pedro A. Szekely;Craig A. Knoblock;Aman Goel

  • Exploiting Semantics for Big Data Integration

    Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro A. Szekely

  • The importance of pointer variables in constraint models

    Brad Vander Zanden;Brad A. Myers;Dario Giuse;Pedro Szekely

  • Management of interface design in humanoid

    Ping Luo;Pedro Szekely;Robert Neches

  • Assigning Semantic Labels to Data Sources

    S.K. Ramnandan;Amol Mittal;Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro Szekely

  • Representing Numbers in NLP: a Survey and a Vision.

    Avijit Thawani;Jay Pujara;Filip Ilievski;Pedro A. Szekely

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig A. Knoblock
Craig A. Knoblock University of Southern California
José Luis Ambite
José Luis Ambite University of Southern California
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Brad A. Myers
Brad A. Myers Carnegie Mellon University
Muhao Chen
Muhao Chen University of California, Los Angeles
Xiang Ren
Xiang Ren University of Southern California
Shih-Fu Chang
Shih-Fu Chang Columbia University
Pablo Castells
Pablo Castells Autonomous University of Madrid
Aram Galstyan
Aram Galstyan University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open up many career options. If flexibility is important, consider pursuing an online degree. Many students look for affordable options, and you can find cheap phd programs online to save on tuition while achieving an advanced qualification.

For those interested in education leadership, there are cheapest edd programs online that can be completed faster and at a lower cost than traditional options. Similarly, students who need to start working quickly may pursue a degree in 6 months online, allowing them to enter the job market sooner.

Additionally, many computer science graduates seek knowledge in related fields, such as business. Pursuing online business degree programs can strengthen your management or entrepreneurship skills, further broadening your career pathways.

With online options in computer science, education, and business, you can tailor your learning to fit your goals and schedule while keeping costs manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro Szekely

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles